lol! And Im the one being accused of taking this personally ! Woohooo look at the nutcake responses! Hey pal the truth hurts some time! I did a small search o you and boy do you need a reality check! Does NPD ring any bells! I can't say as I've ever seen someone more stuck on themselves then you bud! Wake up you may pay for your self indulgent behavior one of these days!
lol as if your opinion held any value anyways..keep on hiding your screen name.
So strongly about your views but so cowardness in standing by them eh? lol.
umm..
eat shit and die- hows that for opinions? lol.
Your response leaves me perplexed: " A change agent "???
Read the WHOLE post again, dude. All the way to the last line.
Here's the tile of your thread "The acceptance of the question is the overall problem with America. " Right, exactly.
My post was precisely an answer to the reason that sort of question gets asked today as opposed to 1978, 1988, 1998, as pointed out by MtnnDeww. I would have thought you to be capable of connecting the dots better. My post was intended to prove your point!!!!
Gotta pick your battles carefully, you might be shooting yourself in the foot if you fire the gun too quickly. *rolls eyes*
Ah so sorry I did only read the beginning as I am being attacked from all sides an was just about ready to post the information I found on the health hazards of this behavior! Very good post and I totally agree, sorry I didnt take the time to read it thoroughly!
Ok these are all things that you can get through penis-vagina or penis-mouth or vagina-mouth contact (replacing anal-specific with vagina, penis, mouth specific)
The only difference is that, since the rectum is much smaller of an opening, it is more likely for the skin to tear or schaffe.
I'm not going to get syphilis because I let the same person I've been with for 3 years put his penis in my butt! I would IF HE HAD syphilis and don't sit there telling me that I wouldn't get it just as easily IF HE HAD SYPHILIS...if he put it in my vagina.
What goes on in other people's bedrooms is none of your concern. Why do you care?
Since I first read the original message, I was hesitant to respond at all. I'm not male, but I'd like to add my 2 cents, even so.
I turned your original question around that considered how I would feel if I learned that my spouse had been "making out" with another man in my absence. The answer for ME is a resounding, "Hell, YES!" Infidelity is infidelity, whether it's with same-sex or hetero contact. My honest feelings about it have nothing to do with sexual orientation, whatsoever, but more with commitment, trust, honesty, integrity, and propogation of a healthy relationship and my feelings apply to my Self, only. If the topic is resolved between consenting adults, there should be no jealousy or negativity associated with it as long as the topic has been discussed, understood, and agreed-upon.
Some people are "comfortable" inviting/sharing additional sexual partners, and I have no judgement on that, except to say that it can be very, very risky emotionally and health-wise. Because human beings are inherently flawed, we can fail to remain unattached to sexual partners and that opens up a whole new can of worms. The health issues are enough to scare the be-jeepers out of me, personally.
I do know that such sexual activities have been known to become extraorordinarily abusive to all parties involved, under certain circumstances. My ex was constantly after me to allow him to bring another man into our bed and, thank God, I refused for 14+ years because I was completely uncomfortable with the idea. For me (and nobody else implied), it would have been the ultimate humiliation, degradation, objectification, and abuse possible at the insistance of my former abuser and there is much more to that story that there is space on this forum. For many, it's an uncomfortable subject and can only be visited in individual fantasy. For those who are comfortable with it, more power to you! Just be safe and respectful with, and to, your additional partners.
Is this #89 person real or is it just someone trying stir up some shit? Who ever it is , is saying some ridiculous stuff. I think its funny who #89 says whoever doesn't agree with him/her is brainwashed. *yawn*
Again, I could care less what body parts they were born with. It's more about the sneakiness and lying. JUST BE HONEST PEOPLE! Is that so hard?
Actually I think that it is for a lot of people because they are scared. Maaaybe if people weren't so judgmental people wouldn't feel the need to sneak around and be afraid of their sexuality.
You are right invalid. You should be very honest about your unhealthy disease spreading activities. Parts is parts right and any old hole will do. lol!
And who is stirring up the shit around here? lmao!
Why are you people on a health site when you have so little respect for natural hygiene?
I'm not quite sure how this thread kept heading toward sodomy and thought maybe sodomy is not what I think it is... so I decided to google "define Sodomy":
sod·om·y (sd-m)
n.
Any sexual act that is not penile-vaginal penetration.
You're right rooth! Perhaps I will just back out of this forum ! I can see this is a little out of control! Although I think this issue is extremely critical in this day and age! I truly feel sorry for the youth of this generation ,they are recieving such corrupted mixed messages through so many mediums, its scary to think of the next acceptible promiscuous activities they will be introduced to!
lol oh please like your such the voice of reason and morale here mr/mrs. sodomy health risks person,you act as if it's your life long goal to warm people of unsafe sexual acts and non-sense..umm..like being a loud mouth hate spewing judging hypocrite like yourself is any better..
89280 (has been on Curezone for 53 days playing bigshot) and 27302 retreated in shame. 89280 has "played" the bigshot SEARCH game so that we wouldn't hear his WHIMPER. Make no mistake about it, people like that know how pitiful they are and they frantically and constantly need to IGNORE that fact (they also hope that others will too, so they find "distractions" for everyone who might notice...judging, searching, changing the subject, etc.). This is why becoming their "target" means that they fear being exposed by your nobility. Once you understand this, you have to try not to let it go to your head that you have become their "target".
(at the bottom of any post, click on "all messages" "sorted by date").
Some people come here just to be a BIGSHOT (they are NEEDY of "games".
If you please, this thread went from a valid question to an all-out NON-supportive thread. The discussion has dissolved into a moral debate and the Personal Conflicts Debate Forum (or, other applicable debate forum) is precisely WHERE this thread now belongs.
Why wasn't anything done sooner to put a stop to the judgemental posts that are a complete disservice to a SUPPORT forum???
Like it or not, the question of itself is still a controversial subject. The only way it could have remained "supportive" as you would have liked, is if all the answers were, "oh, sure go ahead, it's sexy!" or "oh well, as long as no one is getting hurt it's okay". But it just so happens that not everyone on this planet sees the original question as simple or innocuous, nor is everyone ready to give those answers. For some, it's still a sticky subject and to call that judgemental is every bit as judgemental. But don't worry, thanks to the continuous propaganda on tv and movies, the public will be so conditioned to accept this stuff that people like #89 who disagree will be sent to the concentration camps. Serves them right, neanderthal war mongers!
Perhaps the webmaste needs to add a Sex Debate forum now.
Or at least what I had anticipated. I actually didn't expect it to turn into a debate. I really thought some people would say, "Sure as long as _____" or "No, I would really feel that was a violation of trust," etc. I really expected just opinions.
You expected exactly what I said. You're not naive, just young. The world has changed very rapidly, and I expect it will change even faster in times ahead.
You got to have some patience for us old middle agers, it takes a little while to get thousands of years out of our system.
Look around, open your eyes, "life" (each SELF) is not an absolute. Each person you consider "ABNORMAL" makes their/our own life because we REACT to our own unique experiences in life (we REACT to having an abundance of people in our lives who pathetically consider themselves to be NORMAL).
If a person learns (from family or otherwise) to be the victim of passive-aggressive people in society (there's no shortage of people who will exploit you), then we REACT by doing whatever we need to get along in this world, so when you complain about others being "abnormal", remember, collectively, it is people like you who are the cause (what did you expect?, you are the CAUSE of what you mock).
We only REACTED to a life filled with people that wanted to exploit us for their pitiful ego and conscience (and considered themselves "NORMAL" while they considered us "weirdo sicko peons"). It wouldn't hurt you so much to be told that you really aren't "superior" if you weren't in the habit of condescending to others as though they were "abnormal" (there is no such thing in humanity). It is no surprise that you are NEEDY of redeeming your conscience (compensating for your unjust exploitation of others) and also have a need to redeem your ego because you maintain your fantasy "status" by declaring yourself to be "normal".
Using words like "Horse$hit" and "fucked" up (what's the matter, you never heard of a "MESSED" up life/situation?, this is "supportive"/productive criticism or wreckless/ridicule?) stirs EMOTIONS and gets away from intelligent conversation (or isn't that your goal?, is the problem that you can't "hack it"?, make an effort).
People who want to JUDGE (imposing shame, guilt, humiliation, intimidation) and CONVICT and wish that other people RECIEVE A PENALTY are the kinds of people who caused our "situation" in the first place.
You speak of morality as though it is an absolute. "Right and wrong" (conscience) is the ABSOLUTE, "morality" is only an arbitrary set of rules...or does being "normal" keep you from understanding abstract concepts (ideas derived from understanding)?.
Each person's chosen moral philosophy should be the result of their conscience, not of society's "etiquette".
Home
Men - let's set the record straight once and for all 
Re: Health risks of the sodomizer 
