- in it's present manifestion, this one is being sold as Hannah Hysteria
- based on a 3D version of a sellout concert tour
- featuring 15 year old Miley Cyrus and her TV alter Hannah Montana
- at the time of it's birth, the future hysteria began as a Disney series chronicling the life of a teen pop star who by day was pursuing "a normal life" attending school where classmates were clueless to the double life the star lived by night.
- these particulars come by way of the story headlining the front page of the 'Life' section, itself found in the back section (section D) of today's local paper.... backpage headlines, if you will, a story that includes helper video byte photos. The front page of the newspaper itelf includes a helper pointer at the very top pointing viewers to where inside they can find the story of Hanna Hysteria, with sub headline "Local teenage girls flock to film". Here is the photo found on the front page of section D. Please note the specimen 5 year old girl used in the photo to supplement the story said to be about local teenage girls flocking to the hysteria in question. Did I blink and somehow miss 5 year olds being thrust into the envelope pushing the age of teens?
The story as I found it can be found at the link below. My comments to this story are given for several reasons. For starters, it seems important to provide a copy of what this - a new story, looks like today while it is still apparently on the upside - as in upwardly mobile and adorably marketable upside, in contrast to the recent series of ongoing trevails that is the chronicled flame out of a previously soaring, adorable and highly marketable child product; Britney. This seems especially important because of the likliehood that somewhere in the not too distant future, perhaps 5, 10, 20 years removed, somebody, somewhere, will find the nerve to publicly exclaim something like "what went wrong"..... " I tried so hard to be a good parent"...... "why is my once famous child now acting in bizarre ways that are really not all that different from the bizarre ways they've always been trained to act and be paid well for in the past....but is apparently no longer quite so marketable?". This may be relevant to any of the rats presently in training in the specimen generation documented herein, from the adorablly fashion-conscious five year old fan, to the more typical teenaged fans also flocking to local movie theaters, their willing parents, and down to the very marketable Hanna herself. Fan, afterall, is an abbreviation for fanatic. This simple fact seems to be lost often on people who have been trained to litter their lives with all manner, forms and styles of abbreviated thinking and the subsequent behavior, speaking and and acting that results from same.
There are significant particulars less well published but well documented nonetheless as pertains to the world of Disney. Some of these have previously been posted right here in CZ forums. The history of the Disney world now reaches as far back into the history and traditions of American culture as predating by several years the introduction of Dopey, Happy, Bashful, Sleepy, Grumpy, Sneezy, and Doc as names - avatars if you will, pleasing to children while covertly symbolizing the Scandinavian demonic dwarfs they were based upon - Toki, Skavaerr, Varr, Dun, Orinn, Grerr, and Radsvid. Disney, after all, was no garden variety creator of highly marketable hysteria and attendant fanatics found therein.
Around the edges, these rats in training are already manifesting odd behavior for those willing to see such. Where is the mystery? Take Hannah as a for instance. Sure, adorning with makeup, wardrobe accessories, and posture lessons, around the edges they can certainly soften and partly cover up the image of a sociopathic star tramp & diva in the making. As a society made up of people who really care, do you really need to wait for the passage of another 5, 10, 20 years, only to then be prompted by the media when they present updated pictures attached to updated sad storytelling that tells of how this story has finally been recognized by the publilc as one that somehow, somewhere went wrong? The facts are already clear, right now, today, right here, that there is already something wrong in all of this. Would somebody like to take a whack at explaining why we are obligated to wait, why are we obligated to not notice now, why must we allow these kinds of stories to grow and fester before voicing observations to this effect?
I can tell you haven't been around little girls in a while! I noticed about 3-5 years ago that "8" is the new 13 and "13" is the new 18 as far as girls go. Even 5 and 6 year old girls are acting like the teenaged girls screaming at the stage for Paul, George, and John back in the late 60's. Six year old girls wishing they were teens is an old concept. I had Barbies and dreamed of the day I could be 16 and drive and have a boyfriend that would take me on dream dates. Of course, when I got to be 16, the boys I knew weren't rich enough for dream dates, most didn't have their own cars, and none of them looked like Ken.
But I don't remember elementary school aged girls screaming and crying for Justin Timberlake like they do now. Junior high, sure. But elementary school girls were still playing with baby dolls.
I have an almost 13 year old daughter and an 11 year old daughter. They are both beautiful girls, and it's harder to protect them from the world's mindset now than it was with my oldest daughter, who is about to turn 22. My girls aren't in to Miley Ray Cyrus (Hanna Montana), saying she is attractive to younger girls, just like Hillary Duff was to them.
I saw an interesting documentary, I guess, a few years ago about how Madison Avenue had discovered the elementary school girl market and was starting to cash in on them. What Madison Avenue did was to take products they were interested in marketing to elementary schools and find the alpha females. The alpha females were told they had been selected to participate in research which would affect millions of school girls in America. What are girls going to like? The alpha females would dig around in these boxes of *junk* and start saying "ohh! I like this! This is cute!" Well, since the alphas were the top dogs in the whole school, all of their friends wanted what the alphas wanted. And the younger grade level girls wanted what the older grade level girls had. Then the crosstown school girls wanted what those girls had. And so it went through cousins and friends all over the country. The mothers, of course, bought everything their daughters wanted, because to be unpopular in an elementary or junior high school meant social death- the worst thing possible for an elementary school girl!
In the documentary, I saw the Madison Avenue types take these girls into a conference room and tell them they were grooming a rising star who was 13, but she needed some help with her image. They'd ask the girls what the starlet should wear, hair, makeup, song subjects, etc. Whatever the alphas said, from the choices they were given, that's exactly what young stars like Hanna Montana would wear and the kind of songs she would sing.
So anyway, they constantly groom a new Hillary Duff or Hanna Montana every 5 years in order to attract that 5 year market from 5-10 and maybe up to 13. The 8-13 year olds go after the boy men like Johnny Depp. Then at age 13, the girls start getting into real trouble with real boys. Most girls in this country are throwing their purity away at age 13. 13!!
So yes, Oh, there has been a real an palpable shift down in age for young girls to mature more quickly. I am like you and think it's not a healthy thing. The girls aren't thinking about becoming mothers and nurturing babies. They are thinking of becoming the next American Idol. It isn't good.
Yes, you are right Donna. I do not know my way around the present culture of little girls and boys. Maybe this is why it's easier for me to notice the trained-rat effect, especially when it manifests en-masse.
Maybe you remember a post from over a year ago. It talks of some of the random experiences I'm afforded living in a small neighborhood that is slowly being edged out by all the add ons "progress" to the House that Bud built? FYI, on that count alone, remember the man in the purple house? Well, he's been gone for several weeks now. As of yesterday, along the whole mile long strip of narrow neighborhood pass-thru road that runs through this neighborhood AND runs directly adjacent to Bud's house, all but 3 houses have been vacated. This is 3 out of roughly 30 previously occupied homes. Another 35 or so pieces of property have also been taken, but those were pieces not occupied by residents, instead they were empty yards, or perhaps private parking lots, and in one case a small momNpop grocery. Anyway, there was some new headlines the past 3 days. One resident - ONE RESIDENT - out of all of them, had taken a stance. Guess what? Wednesday the local judge ruled on his case. The front page headline ran the judge's ruling "GET OUT!". The judge ruled there was no merit to his case, and said further "if you are not gone by this Friday, I authorize the state to physically evict you and your belongings....that ought to light a fire under you". Yesterday was Friday, today there was a new story on the front page. It recapped briefly the "peaceful end" to the short standoff that began Friday morning... don't you just love it when the media couches these kinds of benign situations into present-day "ooooh, spooky homeland paranoia to worry about, folks!, but rest assured, your thug HSA goodguys won out in this case, without incident to boot!". I passed by there yesterday and today. Yesterday there was some trucks to remove the fellow's belongings. The other 2 holdouts are at the other end of this strip, about a mile away, and apparently their location is not close to where the project is soon to begin. Demolition is supposed to begin this month.
Anyway, back to the trained, squealing rats effect. This aint no little day dreaming girls playing with Barbie doll effects. Neither is the Hannah hysteria. It might be easy to perceive it at that, and I'm sure that helps the brainwasher's mission, but to repeat, this is not that. It might be in part what that old fashioned effect helped spawn, but this is not that. From my yard, I can garden in relative peace....except on game days. I estimate the garden is 400 yards away from the center of the minor league ball stadium that is the house Bud built. During the month of May, when the end of school season is approaching, there are lots of days when school kids from all over the county are bussed to Bud's house. In the beginning 2 years ago, I would wonder for days and days "what IS it that they are doing to these kids to get them to squeal in unison for minutes at a time by the thousands?". This sequence would go on for the duration of the entire 9 inning game. Eventually I could figure out that the group squealing effects were coming during the in-between innings time. Then one day Spring a year ago dad came by and we went to a game, and this happened during the month of May. I got a close up view of small girls and boys by the thousands who had been trucked in from where ever they call home/school. I observed generally that the many of them - especially the older ones, like, the 7th graders and up school crowed, did not seem the slightest interested in actually watching the game, but instead wanted to hangout out at the various one-armed bandits that adorn the back side of the inside of the stadium near all the concession stands. ( I like that word - concession stand....what do you suppose people are conceding? ;) ... video games, all sorts of games that allow the kids to bash and poke and swing and press buttons haphazardly at things for 50 cents a pop, and, of course, all kinds of "food" concessions containing lots of sugar, like pop. One of the newest sugar crazes at this seen is this stuff called Dippin Dots. Anyway, this scene basically goes on as described for 9 innings.
Meanwhile, out on the field side of the stadium, during each half inning break, I finally got to observe up front and in person what the primary stimulants were for producing the effect of a stadium full of trained, squealing rats; trinkets, bartered and barkered by a stadium rep with a microphone at field level. Talk about organized rat stimulators. As soon as the third out of a half inning is recorded, this rep and his team of volunteers dash onto the field to unfold some marketing gimmick using various props. My favorite is the racing sausages dressed up in oversized Mascot gear. I especially like enjoy this when we get an exceptionally hot & humid sprind day. Anyway, whatever the gimmick is (usually based on local advertisers selling stuff - cars, trucks, fast food, and the like), the rep barks out instructions to the crowd to get ready for trinkets. The instructions basically explain what mindless task the little girls and boys in the crowd must execute in order to have the chance at recieving said trinket; squeal at the top of their lungs. Then barker and gang use various implements to propel trinket stuff up into the crowd. They don't actually launch the Pizzas, I think somebody in the front office got the bright idea that might not always be safe. They launch free-pizza coupons instead. It is during these moments that even the kids from the back side, even the Fonzie-wannabes and their Fonzie-chick wannabes, coem streaming out of the concession areas temporarily leaving their haven on the cash side of the operation. They too are not so cool that squealing for trinkets is above them.
Having done my own informal study, the two trinkets that produce the loudest crescendo of synchronized squealing? - free pizza, and free t-shirts. Have you ever observed, like during some sports news replays on tv news, the absolutely mindless acts that adults go through just for the opportunity to grab ahold of a stray foul ball at a pro baseball or football games? .... you know what I mean, like the knuckelheads that always make the highlight reels because they went over the railing from near the top deck, just in the effort to make a heroic snag of a baseball....and somehow they miraculously lived to tell the story? Okay, real leather pro footballs cost about $40 to $50, but really. Do people not generally know that baseballs - even pro grade ones, can be purchased for about $10 or less, and are widely available and distributed all over this nation and are generally never in short supply?
When I consider that people generally perceived to be adults are willing to behave like that, in major league cities all around this nation, and frequently end up on national tv for their efforts, and little children are likely to be watching these same news replays, it really should be no surprise or shock for me to observe how that kind of engrained behavior eventually trickles down to influence the younger minds of our world, the minds inside small girls and boys. At least in the latter, I reserve some room for benefit of the doubt, at least children have a biological reason and perhaps even some legitimate tradition for being inmature minds trapped in inmature bodies. It should not surprise me, but I gotta tell you, it was a bit unsettling to finally figure out and see first hand exactly how it is they were able to produce a stadium full of squealing human trained animals on queue, during multiple moments spread out on average across a 3 or 4 hour session.
In another 10 - 20 years or so, should I live that long, I can imagine that if there comes a day when HSA comes to take us all away, there may be some older folks who still have a mind to resist. Some of these older folks may have their youngins at their side to help form a last line of protectino - like their 20 & 30 year old grown up children, but all it will take is for an official looking person familiar with this particular quarry is to pull out a megaphone and yell "okay , who wants free pizza and t-shirts?", and suddenly the old folks find their last line of defense has instantly melted into their grown children having lapsed into some bizarre shrieking daze drooling at the mouth.
well, on this hallowed day for what seems the majority of american men i think it appropriate to comment. our men have been trained long ago. to the point that they train their own boys willingly to be mindless automatons. sports. need i say more. what we are witnessing is the ultimate breakthrough in human behavior modification. get the girls and get them young. hitler said get the women and the men will follow. so now they have figured out how to get the women. get them as girls.
and on the same note, all i can say is that i'm glad i have boys cause i don't think i could handle all this stuff.....(my boys don't watch any sports as we have no tv)
i read this on the truthnews site as a post to a story about the superbowl security manifestation.....
It’s like men in my family (Besides me the black sheep), highly intelligent, are a warehouse of insight and knowledge, and what do they choose to reflect upon with all the incredible mysteries and questions of the universe. Football and baseball statistics. I mean thirty or forty years of teams, players, and various other facts. You know what, none of them know the Bill of Rights, or basic history and fact. Just menial entertainment, and useless information. But hey, how do you expect to completely control strong, healthy men without making them stupid, flabby, couch potatoes, that couldn’t shoot a gun if their life depended on it, or are afraid to offend or stand up for anything besides sports, or whatever they regurgitate from their television.
Get the women and the men will follow... that's what the serpent did in the Garden of Eden. Oldest trick in the book.
Get them when they are girls...
And you fellas may not realize what they are "getting" the girls with... it' so subtle. I hope my girlfriends here will confirm what I'm seeing.
They're getting the girls with bling. Sparkles. Diamonds (or rhinestones, if they are itty bitty girls). Watch the teen age and college age girls react to a string of diamonds or a pair of diamond earrings put in front of them. It doesn't even have to be a princess cut engagement ring from Tiffany's any more. How many times did you hear "Santa Baby" in the stores this past Christmas? I've just about got the words memorized. The girls don't care about commitment any more. They don't care about true love. These girls can be "bought," and I'm sorry, you know what that makes them. The message is so strong and so blatant. There's no self-respect among these girls. And their mothers think it's OK for their 12 year old daughter to date. I mean date date. These little ol' 14 year old boys who can't even drive are cutting lawns and saving their money to buy jewelry- expensive jewlery- for their girlfriends. Oh, did you happen to see the size of the homecoming corsages those girls are wearing to the football games? $100 for a homecoming corsage from a boy??? It's nuts!
This is a touchy subject for me, and I ask you to forgive me for going off. But, women are being placed in three categories now and I don't like it one bit. Each category is a derogatory term. One means you're mean, one means you're easy, and one means you hate men. What happened to terms like "lady" or "angel" or even just "a good woman?"
I could write an epistle on this subject. But I'll spare you. Y'all are busy watching the Superbowl.
I know your post was mostly about Hanna Hysteria (I listen to the country music station here in Waco when I'm in my car and that's all they talked about yesterday besides the big game), but I don't want to miss the opportunity to rant about your neighbor. Now we all know which female derogatory category I belong to... lol
I am INCENSED by the injustice being done to your neighbors. But it's not just the fact that all levels of govt think they can take someone's land/property away by eminent domain. I think the greater injustice is that your neighbors didn't have an inkling of a clue of their sovereign rights as men and women before God our Creator.
You are the one who first told me about the two separate law systems in this country. There is statutory law, which is the law that is practiced by the judicial system in the US and which all of our USG, Inc. types follow. They have their own set of rules, their own vocabulary, their own trickeries and practices and terms of art, etc, that don't mean a THING like we the regular people have these words to mean.
Then there is the common law, the organic law, "The Law" that is based on Biblical principles. This is the law that the Declaration of Independence referred to when it was written- the "we the people" laws which say that we are BORN with these certain unalienable rights endowed to us BY OUR CREATOR and these rights can't be taken away from us by some willy-nilly government scheme that only benefits them.
You were the one who told me that this statutory law system which benefits govts and the elite calls people "persons," and told me that in the eyes of the government, based on the vocabulary they use, I, Donna, was a corporation- a for-profit business. At the time, I laughed it off. I thought it was funny. But a dear friend showed me how terribly sober it actually is.
I know, Oh, with the deepest knowing I have to know, that I am a woman, and NOT AT ALL a person/corporation/business. If I enter into ANY kind of an agreement with the State, whether it be a driver's license or the purchase of some property, the State doesn't view me as a woman, but as a corporation. I know the State makes these contracts with me in order to benefit the State and that I am legally bound by them, but they can wiggle around and default on their side of it any time they want to, because they wrote the contract.
I know, that since it's a State contract, and since they think of me as a business and not a real live flesh and blood woman, that they think they can come in and breach that contract and take what is rightfully mine. It doesn't matter if my rights are protected by the US Constitution. If I'm a business, I don't HAVE these rights. Those Constitutional rights were to protect "we the (sovereign) people." But in the statutory court sytem... the novus ordo seclorum, the anti-Christ system, I, Donna, the woman, created by God, don't exist.
Oh, honey.
Out of all your neighbors, only ONE fella had the guts to fight for his rights. Yay, dude! But what did the judge say to him? "Get the ---- out by Friday or we'll drag you out!" Look at the intimidation tactics! If you don't "obey" your civil authorities, they will come in with guns and dogs! And if you live in my neck of the woods, tanks!
Arrrrgh!
But, Oh, people don't know who they are. They don't know their real position. They don't know what they were born with. They think the GOVT gives them these rights, and then when the govt comes along and steals these rights and properties and freedoms, the people just shrug and say "that's life." It just makes me cry, Oh, because it isn't true! We the people have been lied to, and the truth has been hidden from us by an educational and media system run by the very folks who only have their own best intentions at heart and not ours.
Where was I? Why didn't I go talk to Purple House Guy and offer to be his friend? Why didn't I pray for him?
I mean, I live in Texas and there was this little mission church in San Antonio called the Alamo. Maybe you've heard of it. There were about 30 guys in there that held off the entire Mexican Army for days. Congressman David Crockett heard about these boys and ran down from Tennessee (hope I spelled it right)to help out because that was a cause worth fighting for. They fought to the death for what they believed in. I think that fighter spirit is in all of us Texans.
We've got to stick up for each other, and I'm willing to do it. I know the country's all hoo-ah about the war over there, but there's a war going on right here under our noses. We don't see the guns much yet, but if we blow it now, our grandkids will see the guns.
Sometimes we just have to decide in our hearts to do the right thing, no matter the cost. And we need to stand together. Fight together. And above all, pray together.
Donna, your reply is so fitting. As much and as often that I am brutally honest with you, to a fault, you remain as one of the seeming rare few, almost like that one ONE RESIDENT, who knows, who cares, who understands and has the balls to say so..... yeah, another gender-neutral phenom often observable from up this way....where "yous guys" can be gals and guys alike, and where even gals are seen to have the kind of balls that men themselves often appear to be lacking :)
Wednesday a week ago there was the first local front page headline telling of the Judge's haughty "GET OUT!" ruling; a female judge at that as if that might make any difference. In this instance, I do not see that it made any difference except, maybe, helping the average Joe & Josephine among the herd to consider this a kinder, softer method of beign told, again, in no uncertain terms "you can't fight city hall". The online version of this news story also included some write-in comments, sort of like "letters to the editor", kinda, sorta. In years past, I'd always heard that actual printed newspapers and their Letters to the Editor section were usually based on the editor having screened & filtered these letters to match their agenda. I don't know if this is true for on-line electronic versions of newspapers. Whether it is or isn't, there was only a handfull of on-line comments to this news story, and most of them were sort of looking like they wer Pro establishment, making comments like "this guy is the only one to resist, meanwhile none of the other peope who've already left put up a problem. Why is this guy thinking he's so special?....ya can't fight city hall".... that kind of comment that I saw as not at all encouraging.....in a way, a rather special kind of peer pressure added to the state-sponsored eminent domain formula. For too long people have been taught to think of all that goes on in this world in this context is only a game for which the people only need concern themselves with getting themselves on the winning side of regardless of the fundamental at hand. For too long the herd has been taught to think of every significant issue as though it is a fight to spectate over only but certainly never get involved in, to get bloodied or dirtied The herd has not been taught to know that there are times when they are going to the slaughter one way or the other and as such there are times when it is worthy to have at least tried on the way to slaughter rather than having patienly, quietlyl sat out the waiting somewhere where there is a relatively comfortable patch of grass to graze on.
Anyway, a week ago Wednesday I was in a local coffee shop and while waiting for a cup of decaf to go, from a distance I overheard the counter person exclaim to a customer "even after they offered him $74,000 for his piece of junk home, the guy still refuses to go!" and this was said in a kind of "duh...what's wrong with this guy?" attitude. So, I sort of moseyed over to her and politely asked "are you on the side of pro eviction?". She looked at me in a friendly way and said "no, not really, but for $74,000?"... "plus they said there might possibly kinda maybe be another $26,000 'assistance' in it for him". I said "yeah, that might sound like a lot of money to some people, but first of all, you might not realise that the dollar is, today, effectively the value of toilet paper".
Before I realized it, this woman and I were having a chat that lasted 10 minutes or more, and not long after we had hashed out the headline (she actually agreed with me on the land takings issue) and into other related areas of civics. I introduced myself, she did the same and shook hands with me. Somehow this then segued into her telling me how she's been a Breast Cancer survivor for 7 years. At no point were we arguing. Given how this started out, it was actually kind of odd, in a pleasing way, to find out that all it took for her to change her tune a bit was for a stranger to walk up and politely ask some pointed questions that made her think a bit more before answering. A lot of what she said in answer seemed to mirror the kind of thoughts that I have on these kinds of issues. In my mind I'm wondering "hmmm, had I not walked over and said something, she might still be talking in terms of sticking with the herd, but now that I've sort of pireced that invisible veil, she's sort of done an about face and is a real wealth of knowledge.....". I don't know how else to explain this, but I sort of got the idea that the main reason she'd made the initial comment that I heard from across the room is because she was just doing what a lot of people publicly feel safe in doing; saying things that, just in case somebody nearby hears, people are deathly afraid of saying anything that a passerby might liberally interpet as "oh, you are a protestor, are you?... you are an unpatriotic American, are you? yada yada yada".
Do you noticed that a lot of people often maintain this sort of false cover, to sound lke they just minding their own business following the herd..... just trying to sound like they fit in, ya know? In other words, it seemed like it took a stranger walking up, being polite, not beign confrontational, asking some pointed questions, and maybe in the process letting her get the idea that I was not some undercover HSA thug or thought police or cop or newspaper guy or banker dude or the like, before she then opened up and began telling me some of what she really thought. Eventually the shop got busy again, she had to go back to work but said "be sure to come back, I'd like to talk about this stuff some more".
Donna, you are just one person. I'm just one person. Somewhere around here there are another few one persons. At the current rate, I figure if the two of us or 5 of us or 20 of us can have another 400 years or so, eventually we just might have the ears of enough people who really care to get some where. :)
Wow, Oh, thank you for the compliment. A Yankee said a blonde Southern girl had balls. That's... pretty amazing. :-D I have to deflect the praise and say several sweet, sweet people have invested a lot of time and energy into me to get me to the point where I could write something like the above post.
But in case anybody starts thinking we've got a love fest going on here... aren't you getting thirsty for another decaf? LOL You're a great teacher, Oh, and it looks like somebody just signed up for your class! :-) :-) :-)
Donna, I did something quite out of the ordinary; I voted (for you), on the above issue, AND the really really really out of the ordinary aspect of this is, I have no qualms or other silly yellowness about publicly attaching my name to said vote, which, NEWSFLASH, this just in by way of polll update central, was Yay #2 for candidate DP9 on said Purple House issue.
excerpted from the beginning section of the chapter - The Disney Bloodline. The names of a few prominent characters have been highlighted.
-------------
While Hollywood was immersed in moral filth from the start, Walt Disney Studios had strict standards. In the 1930’s, Disney had a dress code that required men in ties, and women in sober-colored skirts. If a man looked lecherously at a woman at Walt Disney Studios he risked being instantly fired. Walt was a shining example of the strictest legalism. Even during the ’50's, if an employee were caught saying anything considered a cussword such as "hell" they were instantly fired no matter who they were. Walt would not allow his male employees to have any facial hair, even though he himself sported a mustache. He never allowed employees to have alcohol at the studios, (which might be a noteworthy standard except that Walt himself drank heavy amounts of alcohol in his private office at work for decades). Initially, Walt was very reluctant to have his young artists, who were being trained by Don Graham, draw live nude models, but reluctantly gave approval.
Again the motive was not to serve God, but to make sure the Disney reputation remained untarnished. With the power of the establishment media behind Disney, Walt had nothing to worry about, news about the nude drawing classes and their detailed drawings never reached the light of day. Behind such strict fronts of legalistic morals, cleanliness & soberness, you will often find lots of guilt and high level satanic ritual. For instance, Hitler (who was by the way also a failed artist & who liked mechanical things more than people) obsessively washed his hands many times a day (out of guilt), and so did Walt Disney. Walt obsessively washed his hands several times an hour, every hour. Walt liked animals & his trains more than people. This author has seen some alters who were forced to take another human’s life, and when they relived the memory, the alters then tried to physically wash the blood guilt off of their hands. Another example is that over the years this author has discovered that many of the exclusive restaurants that are meticulous in every detail are tied in with the mind-control and criminal activities of the elite. Dirty money is keeping the places looking sparkling clean.
Walt Disney worked very hard at maintaining a great image for himself and his company. An example of this, is how he exploded in rage and wrote an angry memo when a Disney character was placed in a beer ad. (Memo mentioned in Thomas, Bob. Walt Disney An American Original. Hyperion, 1994, p. 7.) He had a personal image builder, Joe Reddy, who worked full time to build Walt’s image. Joe Reddy was a cigar-smoking irishman who loved the catholic college Notre Dame’s football team. He also was a publicity agent for Shirley Temple. But the Disney deception entails far more than Joe Reddy’s decades of image making, and Walt’s own abilities to create good images of himself. Just as with Billy Graham (see Vol. 2 about Billy Graham), the entire Illuminati threw their weight behind promoting Walt Disney. Ronald Reagan and Walt Disney were good friends and both cut from the same die in many ways. Both men were high ranking Freemasons, both came from socialist backgrounds (Ronald’s mother was Eleanor Roosevelt’s best friend, & Walt’s Dad was a socialist leader), both were paid FBI informants, and both were involved heavily in the abuse of mind-controlled slaves. Walt always generously supported Reagan’s political campaigns, and in turn Reagan did political favors for Walt as Gov. of California. For instance, Disney’s Mineral King mountain resort needed an access route through the Sequoia Nat. Park at a time when there was lots of congressional pressure to preserve the last stands of redwoods. Gov. Reagan got his friend Disney his road through the park.
Reagan served as the emcee for the opening day of Disneyland on July 17, 1990. He returned with Illuminati TV host Art Linkletter for the 35th anniversary. Ronald Reagan & Art Linkletter both pumped Disney publicly. Another slave abuser that spent time with Disney was Bob Hope, who would spend time on the golf course with Walt. On the opening day’s telecast, cameras showed Sammy Davis, Jr. (a member of the Church of Satan) and Frank Sinatra (a mind-control slave handler) driving the pint-sized Disney ears at the Autopia ride. When Disney celebrated its fifty yr-anniversary with a two hour special on May 20, 1991, the program included people like occultist Bill Campbell and was named "Best of Disney, 50 Years of Magic." For the silver anniversary of Disney World in Oct. ’96, the Clinton’s were invited to help open 15 months of celebrations. The theme of the anniversary celebrations was "Remember the Magic". A Boy’s & Girl’s Club sang ‘When you wish upon a star’ (a popular programming song). Hillary Rodham Clinton (herself an Illuminati Grand Dame and a mind-control programmer) shared with the audience that she and Bill "first brought daughter Chelsea to the Magic Kingdom when she was four." Roy E. Disney, nephew of Walt, told the public that Disney World "is the story of men and women who took hold of a dream and never let go." There is a double meaning to that. Many victims of trauma-based mind-control have taken hold of the illusions that were programmed into their mind secretly at Disney, and never let go.
Among the visitors to Disneyland have been all the American Presidents from Eisenhower to Clinton, over a dozen kings & queens, as well as Emperor Akihito of Japan, Anwar Sadat, and Robert Kennedy (who rode the Matterhorn with astronaut John Glenn.) Both Denmark’s & Belgium’s kings who are in the Illuminati visited, as well as the dictators of Indonesia, the Shah of Iran and Ceausescu of Romania. (As a side-note Roy E. Disney was forewarned by Arab leader that the Shah was to be deposed.) Organizations that have been actively working for a New World Order for many years gave big awards to Walt in his early years such as the B’nai B’rith (Man of the Year Award to Walt) and the Chamber of Commerce. In 1936, Walt was given the Chamber of Commerce’s annual ,,Outstanding Young Man" award. The establishment’s Yale & Harvard Universities gave him honorary degrees. Walt Disney biographer Leonard Mosley, who researched Walt Disney for years (as well as writing books on the duPonts, the Dulles brothers, and Hirohito) wrote in his book on Walt Disney, "The studio publicity machines in the film colony had, as usual, gone out of their way to try to persuade me, as a writer for a powerfully influential British newspaper, that this was a city of lawless gods and goddesses, full of clean-living, sanitized stars.
"It was even more of a deodorized world at the Walt Disney Studio where the publicity men insisted their boss was faultless--never drank too much, never used a swearword, never lost his temper, never quarreled with his wife or family, never let down a friend. And woe betide anyone who tried to suggest otherwise. Members of the resident foreign and local press risked their jobs if they dared to write stories inferring that Walt Disney could be domineering, implacable, and unforgiving (as was the case, for instance, before, during, and after the 1941 studio strike). The Disney flacks were capable of exerting heavy pressure on editors and proprietors or, through the advertising pages, against anyone who inferred Walt Disney was not the epitome of well-scrubbed and benevolent perfection." (Mosley, Leonard. Disney’s World. New York: Stein & Day, p. 10.) Disney is perhaps the epitome of Illuminati abilities to create images. They have created great images for things Disney, incl. Walt Disney, Disney movies, and Disney’s Amusement parks. In some cases these things have been overrated, in other instances the sinister side to them has been carefully hidden. In order to make movies that contain the typical smut of Hollywood, sex and violence, Disney did a slight of hand and created subsidiaries which Disney runs, which has allowed them to keep their good image. They also never showed the public the hard core porn that was made for years in secrecy for the elite.
Behind Disney’s good front lies hard porn, snuff films, white slavery, Illuminati mind-control, and the seduction of several generations into witchcraft. Disney’s involvement in these kind of things will be explained in this chapter. Nobody has sold America witchcraft as well as the Disney brothers. Movie after movie has cleverly brought the occult into the warp & woof of American thought, all under the disguise of entertainment. For instance, it was Disney that brought us cannibalism and told us that it was a "triumph of the human spirit" (a direct quote from Disney’s Touchtone Producer Robert Watts concerning Disney’s movie "Alive" featuring survivors of an airplane crash who turned to cannibalism). Under the disguise of entertainment & showing us how "triumphant" the human spirit was, they subtly promoted cannibalism. Mickey Mouse plays a leading role in "The Sorcerer’s Apprentice." And yet when this author has suggested that Disney movies aren’t wholesome, many Christian parents come unglued and have gotten angry with this author. The deceptive image that Disney movies are wholesome is a triumph in Illuminati deception. Parents would be surprised what is slipped into cartoons. In Disney’s "The Little Mermaid" the castles are male sexual organs. In one cartoon Mighty Mouse is shown without comment clearly snorting cocaine. Walt Disney Studios Chairman Joe Roth is in charge of Walt Disney as well as subsidiaries Touchtone, Miramax, and Hollywood Pictures, which were all created to camouflage the Disney production of adult films. Disney operates in a clandestine manner regarding the promotion, distribution and rating of the films produced by their subsidiaries.
Roth oversaw Disney’s subsidiary Hollywood Pictures’ Evita film. Evita has as its main start "Material Girl" Madonna. Madonna is in reality a mind-controlled slave who has appeared in numerous underground porn/& ritual porn movies. (This author has an underground catalog from a porn business, that has recently changed its location of business. The catalog offered a film of Madonna performing an actual blood sacrifice.) She also was the main actress in Disney’s Dick Tracy film which is reported to be used for mind-control. During an Arsenio Hall show, Madonna, who as a guest acted dissociative, was picked up by the cameras during the show kissing her Baphomet ring. Disney controls the products that are associated with the movies of their subsidiaries. In Evita’s case they are marketing hats and other items, as just one more of Disney’s countless artificially generated consumerism campaigns. In Ruth Stein’s interview of Madonna, Madonna appeared bored with plugging Disney’s consumer products. When asked about the tango dresses and hats inspired by Evita that popped up in stores after the film, Madonna said, "Believe me, I have nothing to do with it. Disney is pushing the whole thing." (San Francisco Chronicle, 12/29/96, Datebook section). In one interview Madonna states she wants her daughter to grow up knowing Catholicism, but she doesn’t believe that it would be good for her daughter if Madonna married the father of her child from Lourdes, Carlos Leon. In another interview, Madonna says, "Actually, I’m a very good role model, because I say, ‘Look, these are my standards’..." She then goes on to plug homosexuality, same sex marriage, and single families in the interview. Walt Disney stated that it plans to release an album by DANZIG, a heavy metal band whose songs contain "dark themes". The Disney press release announces on its by-line "Mickey Mouse is going heavy metal." Disney’s album ,,BLACK ACID DEVIL" was due to hit the music stores Oct. 30, 1996 during Halloween time. According to Disney this music has no satanic references, but does have "dark, Gothic and sexual" overtones. Glenn Danzig denies that he is a satanist.
Home
another generation in training 
