genetic change and passing that "change" from one generation to the next is proving to be driven by stress including, diet and environmental influences... lack of nutrition and an abundance of toxins are PRIMARY driving forces of this genetic change.
nutrigenetics... epigenetics... etc.
big pharma is into it with both feet - they know this without doubt... just to publicly state such would undermine their business model and blow your own arguments along with those such as yourself all to he!!... many job offerings for the "microme project"... but then, they are looking to "fix" the human/planetary gene problems that "they" have created with more genetic engineering and manipulation.
it will only make things worse... they can call it whatever they want... and sugar coat it however they want... it is still biotechnology... and it is their misunderstandings of our genes to begin with (believing they are stagnant for one) and the subsequent "genome project" and biotechnologies that have created this mess, and will create an even bigger mess as they dig the proverbial money pit... that no one will ever know how to clean up.
Humpty Dumpty comes to mind. Seems apropos.
Kids born these days are going to have it rough... real rough... they are weaker, sicker, and more vulnerable than ever... all while having to deal with an ever increasingly toxic environment and literally garbage for food.
The U.K. predicted recently about 60 years of any viable nutritional worth left on cropland... if that.
And that I would say minimal nutritive need... not optimal need.
we're screwed, your arguments and threats are empty...
Oh yeah, mainstream science knows all about cancer. That is why more people are getting cancer and dying of cancer every year as has been the case ever since the war on cancer was declared half a century ago and mainstream science was brought to bear.
As noted Dr. John Cannell, the head of the Vitamin D Council, stated, ""Slavery to evidence based medicine is fine for scientists and unethical for practitioners."
The mere fact that some materials are labeled as carcinogens acknowledges that absorption of these substances cause cancer, by definition, which makes the assertion of falsehood you've made, a frivolous one !! Do you think they will move your posting over to the Jokes forum ?
Funny, Some materials are labeled as carcinognes because the significalty raise the likelyhood of cancer developing. Claiming that it causes cancer is far too ambitious and only people like you make such statements. The people who provide you the data, the name, the label, don't.
You're too quick to stereotype, I had only posted two messages above and you cannot possibly know enough about me to make such a personal judgement. In my experience, people who are so quick to pre-judge others are not the type I choose to interact.
People here have and incredibly skewed version of science. You don't seem any different, though perhaps witha little more knowledge than the rest. Since some here were insulting me by suggesting I was someone else, I've been reading through those old posts. I've gotten to know the flavor of your posts. Actually only you and 2 other people from the credulant side seem to be teh only ones who even put an effort. The rest are little more than nyanyanyanya.
I was just messin with ya a little. An inherent fault in my previous reply is that it also allowed for you to have come back saying I was also quick to judge, by lumping you in with others who are quick to judge (!!) and therefore guilty of it myself. I'm optimizing something now for about a month and its 75 mins between runs and I've exhausted other forms of passing time, so I looked on here. I can't wait until I'm done, laying a translucent conductive layer onto glass for a battery project. Meantime, I hope you have a good evening.
" People here have and incredibly skewed version of science."
Keep in mind also that curezone permits persons as young as 13 to obtain a user name, and it could be possible often that many authors on here are youngsters.
Images Description Cancer Recommended Books Cancer Homepage Rules
Home
cancer is a DEFENSE MECHANISM--not a disease 
Re: cancer is a DEFENSE MECHANISM--not a disease 
