how hard would it be to make a zapper that has both a variable power output, as well as a variable frequency?
In other words the user could choose from a power output that might range from say .5 micro amps up to 5 or 10 milliamps. would that be difficult to engineer?
Also what about frequency? By which I mean you could also include rife technology into the design of the zapper. The electricity would be introduced into your body at a frequency setting of your choice. Preferably at least 0 to 1000 Hz, but hopefully you can make it go much higher. How difficult or realistic would that be?
This would be the ultimate personal zapper/rife device!
Your F-165 by default puts out a positive offset square wave just like a Hulda Clark Zapper. And it will go to any frequency with a variable voltage output. Program 30,000 Hz and you have a basic Hulda Clark Zapper with a variable voltage output.
You could also take a basic Hulda Clark circuit and put a variable resistor in place of the resistor that determines frequency.
Put a current meter in series with the output and crank it up to whatever you want. But your current meter will have to capable of of measuring current in the frequencies you choose.
Heh Heh! Looks like it's for DC only. Plus it is only a Max 200 uA meter. It's going to take something much more than that. Also as the frequency changes you have to have something that is capable of measuring the range you are at.
Their isn't really any reason to monitor the current as the Atelier will only allow a Max output current of 125 ma. You might have to turn it down a little at the lower frequencies but you can crank it and barely feel it at the higher frequencies.
okay now I am confused. I thought it could put out at least 13 volts?
This is from the user's manual online
----
The amplitude (volume) knob controls the voltage level on output 2 (II). This is the output connector closest to the knob. It has a range of 0 to 13V in DC mode and 0 to 26 Vpp in AC mode. Voltage increases when you turn the knob clockwise
okay now I am confused. I thought it could put out at least 13 volts?
This is from the user's manual online
----
The amplitude (volume) knob controls the voltage level on output 2 (II). This is the output connector closest to the knob. It has a range of 0 to 13V in DC mode and 0 to 26 Vpp in AC mode. Voltage increases when you turn the knob clockwise
JAB
That's the voltage. I was taking about Current.
Current is the flow of electrons. Much like the flow of water. Voltage is more like the pressure of water. Like the potential energy in a Dam of water.
okay thanks. I fully I am a complete novice when it comes to electricity
Any idea on how to calculate the magnetic field of a coil hooked up to the F165?
Basically I want to make a PEMF device. I know that the magnetic field strength of a coil is dependent on how many turns of the coil, the diameter of the coil, and the amount of current going into the coil. possibly there are other variables, I don't know
I want to create a magnetic field in the 50 micro tesla range, using a 4 inch diameter coil (using insulated copper wire) that is hooked up to the F165. This will allow me to vary the frequency of the magnetic field. how do I calculate how many turns that coil needs? I know there are formulas that allow you to do it, but they are confusing for me
What are you trying to accomplish? The F165 doesn't really have enough current to put out anything but a very weak magnetic field.
Unless you are trying to develop a new product. It would be less expensive to just buy something that fits your criteria instead of reinventing the wheel.
Low frequencies are hard to measure through the air as the antenna has to be very large to pick them up. They don't tell you that when you buy their product. I had to send back a similar product.
like I said I am trying to construct a PEMF device that has the same magnetic field strength as the Earth's own magnetic field, which is about 50 micro tesla
I would also like to be able to pulse it, which is why I want to use the frequency generator
If you know of something on the market like this that doesn't cost $2500 or more, I would be thrilled. Because so far everything on the market that meets the specifications cost at least that much so far as I can tell
Are you telling me if I buy that meter and I hold it a quarter of an inch away from the magnetic coil, that it will not give a reading? I find that hard to believe
Since the magnetic field will only have to be as strong as the magnetic earth the F165 might work. But if you move inches away form the coil the field strength will drop quickly.
I don't know much about PEMF but this site seems to explain it more clearly. They do sell them though.
Notice that it is copyrighted by curatronic ltd. That doesn't mean what they say is invalid, just be aware that they are trying to sell you something
I did e-mail them for the price list a few weeks ago, and if I remember correctly it is somewhere in the $3000 range
The second link you provide looks like an interesting device. However they do not note the strength of the magnetic field that it generates. Given that they are trying to compare it to the beck mag pulsar, it's reasonable to assume the strength of the field is pretty high. and furthermore it does not look as if the user can choose to raise or lower the strength of the magnetic field
Anyway, I just thought if I could connect a magnetic coil to the AR165 then I could create my own pulse electromagnetic field device with just about $35 worth of supplies, instead of paying $3000 or more for yet another unit. However, with the extremely low amperage output of the AR165 I really have no idea what kind of magnetic field it will produce
I don't think the Klemens would work for the Beck Protocol as it pulses too quickly. Probably doesn't have the same magnetic pulse strength. More of a cell rejuvenation tool. But it does pull a lot of Amps at a high voltage so I'm not sure.
The Kemens Pulser According to Walter Last
However, there is now also a different type of magnetic pulser available with up to 10 or more pulses per second (see Resources in Australia). It appears to work by creating a pulsing magnetic field rather than just single very short pulses. This is very effective for treating areas of pain and inflammation as well as restoring weak organs and tissues. Instead of directly killing or disabling cancer cells it appears to work by restoring the electric membrane potential of cells to a healthy level. This is presently my favourite.
The F165 is a voltage source device, designed to maintain a constant voltage no matter what the load is (within a specified range). As such it will not give you what you want, a current source device. Neither will any 555-type zapper or oscillator circuit, as they too are designed to act as a voltage source.
But they make great, cheap, reliable oscillators. So what you want is any oscillator that has the frequency range you want, driving a constant-current output stage. Parazapper has a unit based on this topography, but I don't think his has an adjustable output current value.
Later on you said you were getting advice on another forum about this. I'd like to see what they recommend. If you just want to bang on a coil every so often, that's not hard to do.
All I know is what PZ has posted in the past. It is a constant-current output, so the output voltage adjusts itself automatically (within a limited range) to maintain a preset (or adjustable?) current value. This is supposed to overcome the variations in energy being delivered caused by variations in skin resistance, contact pressure, body chemistry, etc.
Generally speaking, constant current sources are less preferred (and less understood?) by contemporary engineering thinking, probably because the math is a bit more complicated than for constant voltage sources. OTOH, the standard telephone is a pseudo-constant-current device, which is why the volume in the earpiece varies so little between a house next door to the exchange and a house 3 miles away. Whenever the quality of the electrical connections is in question, cc outputs deliver more consistant performance than cv outputs.