Subject: Ultimately We Have to Arrive at a Confident and Firm Recommendation! Don't We?
Many of you have watched me and my organization evolve over last 3 years. Our position, our endorsements, our opinions have evolved along with personal experiences and as new research poured in.
Never have we trashed a natural therapy or tried to scare anyone when cancer was involved, we have stated concerns over some applications if there were any obvious questions,...like zeolite being aluminum.
Today! Now and Forever! We have reached a solid position on cancer and viral therapies.
Today we are firmly recommending IV ozone combined with Cesium IV's for any and every cancer patient.
Arriving at this ultimate realization has been based upon personal results, but research and clinical data supports this position.
We have come to the realization that 90% of all natural cancer therapies are pro oxidant. (Either they promote healthy oxidative phosphorylation or use reactive oxygen to cause build up of peroxides or even rapid oxidation of microbes outside and inside cancer cells) Sorry about any misuse of terminology.
We can argue about mechanism but seeing is believing,...theory and conjecture will never replace good old fashion, "seeing with your own eyes."
Every Single one of you should know:
We have seen the following over last four years.
1) Many side affects to oral cesium,...mostly GI.
2) Hemolytic anemia using peroxide IV's.
3) Remarkable response to ozone IV. Including improved anemia, raised cell counts, accelerated tissue healing, detox, and improved alkalinity just from using ozone.
4) More favorable responses to cancers above the waiste.
5) Fewer side affects to cesium per IV
6) People self-treating using alternatives fail to follow any specific protocol to its letter, out of fear, desperation, misdirection, miscommunication,...they screw up the therapies!
7)Doing Ozone at home is risky venture,...the equipment purchases, the correct manufacturer, proper usage of equipment, maitenance, sufficient dosing, and effective non- harmful application by route of delivery.
Why would you involve these variables if you are fighting for your very own life,...I don't know.
I have literally seen people taken from death bed to recovery in 90 days using ozone first, cesium second in IV. Sure, they are augmenting with Coq10, glutathione and other touted stuff at times!
What's been consistent however was this IV combination which in theory should work every time if you subscribe to Keith Brewer, Otto Warburg, William Koch, Linus Pauling
I have started compiling a list and interviewing ozone providers in ever single state. They should be licensed to perform ozone IV.
Maryland has just placed an order / law, this now prohibbits ozone IV,..(although molecular oxygen is an intergal part of photodynamic therapy,)...an approved therapy.
Merry Christmas To all Of you Meatballs Out There!
Ozone therapy is actually very easy to use at home. And there are big advantages to doing this. You can go pay big bucks to get an occasional injection and allow the remaining cancer to grow in between as well as any associated infections. Or people can get cold corona units with an oxygen source and administer it at home multiple times a day to keep killing off cancer cells and its associated infections. This will also help with increasing immune factors such as peroxides, cytokines and white blood cell activity while destroying cancer causing microbes and carcinogens.
How the ozone will be administered will depend on what is being treated. Brain tumors for example can be treated through ear insufflation. Most internal cancers through rectal or vaginal insufflation. Direct tumor injection in some other cases, etc.
And research has show that rectal insufflation is as effective as autohemotherapy after a few applications. Although if other factors are added insufflation can actually be more effective than injections or autohemotherapy and without the risks of injection. And there is another big drawback to injections other than the invasiveness, cost and risk of emboli. To avoid emboli the ozone is supposed to be injected at a very slow rate, about 1cc/min. Problem is that the half life of ozone under ideal conditions is only about 15 minutes. Since more than 15cc is usually administered at a time this means that most of what is injected will not be ozone anymore by the time it is injected. In addition concentration is a lot more critical with injections as opposed to insufflation. And with insufflation the treatments can be done safely for extended periods of time once the colon becomes accustomed to the ozone after a few treatments. This allows the body to saturate more thoroughly with the ozone than by any other means of application.
And equipment cost is less expensive in most cases than going through ozone injection rounds for cancer by a doctor.
Again people need to do some homework before applying any therapy for cancer or other disease. Ozone is definitely the safest and most effective cancer therapy ever devised for cancer. But there is NO single best method of application. It all depends again on various factors such as where the cancer is located, how advanced it is and what equipment they have access to. In most cases though buying a cold corona system and an oxygen source is going to be the most effective and least expensive way to go, and the person will also have the advantage of owing the unit for use in the future or for family or friends. Also keep in mind that ozone has many beneficial uses other than disease treatment. So again it is nice owning the unit.
I notice when you give recommendations to people with cancer, that only sometimes do you mention the Rife machines. Mostly you just mention Ozone.
My question is, alot of the modern ozone machines are hot corona as you've said, so if a person isn't sure about what sort of Ozone machine is available, would it better to use a rife machine using the 666hz? I know you're also somewhat skeptical of the multiple frequency units but I've come across quite a few anecdotal cases of people being cured of cancers using that frequency on modern machines ( a non-hodgkins one recently as well, in case person below is reading), so maybe would that be a less risky option, less margin for error?
Lasty, what do you make of John Crane and that frequency list? I've looked through it and noticed that 666 is listed for four cancers ; Melanoma, Non-Hodgkins, prostrate, Leukemia, as well being in 'general' set. Why did he include it in only a few cancers, did he have a bit of guilt trip when was fabricating the whole list and think "well, i'll leave the frequency in there for a few of them", just to settle his conscience or something? I find the whole thing very weird.
I notice when you give recommendations to people with cancer, that only sometimes do you mention the Rife machines. Mostly you just mention Ozone.
There are several reasons for that:
1. I find ozone is more effective and has more benefits.
2. Cancer cells are not able to build a tolerance to ozone the way they can with RF, especially if the person had previous radiation therapy.
3. I don't wish to get in to long debates with people trying to explain to them that multiple frequencies ARE NOT needed. Same reason I do not post on the Rife forum. We have found that the 666hz works on everything we have tried it on including various cancers, neuropathies, MS, MD, etc. There is a basis behind this one frequency and behind why Rife's other two frequencies worked but were slow. But many people believe that Rife had numerous frequencies, which is not true, and that the frequency list is accurate, which is also not true. The first time I saw that frequency list was about 20 years ago, which came with the Crane units he was selling for $7500. But they were not based on the Rife frequencies and some of the frequencies listed are cancer causing such as 42hz. But again there are people who look at the frequency list like their Bible, and I am not going to waste my time arguing with them over the fact the list is bogus.
One thing I do like about the Rife units though is that they are less invasive compared to most forms of ozone administration. So it is a good alternative to ozone provided the proper frequency is used.
My question is, alot of the modern ozone machines are hot corona as you've said, so if a person isn't sure about what sort of Ozone machine is available, would it better to use a rife machine using the 666hz?
That is hard to say. Hot corona can still be used for some applications if air is used or internally if pure oxygen is used. It is not as god, but will still work. And Rife units will lose effectiveness if the person has had prior radiation therapy or if the wrong frequencies are used. So each has its pros and cons.
I know you're also somewhat skeptical of the multiple frequency units but I've come across quite a few anecdotal cases of people being cured of cancers using that frequency on modern machines ( a non-hodgkins one recently as well, in case person below is reading), so maybe would that be a less risky option, less margin for error?
Again in some cases it may be a better choice.
Lasty, what do you make of John Crane and that frequency list?
I am not impressed with his list. Again there was a basis for the Rife frequencies that Rife himself was not aware of. I am not very good at explaining it. It was actually my father that figured it out. The Crane frequencies other than the few Rife frequencies he uses. And the other two rife frequencies are slightly off, which is why they work but are much slower. And the list also has 42hz listed on some of the cancers. But 42hz is the frequency of formaldehyde, which is one of the strongest carcinogens known.
I've looked through it and noticed that 666 is listed for four cancers ; Melanoma, Non-Hodgkins, prostrate, Leukemia, as well being in 'general' set. Why did he include it in only a few cancers, did he have a bit of guilt trip when was fabricating the whole list and think "well, i'll leave the frequency in there for a few of them", just to settle his conscience or something? I find the whole thing very weird.
I don't know why he did that or why he bothered to come up with so many bogus and potentially dangerous frequencies. We think it was to throw people off of the real research or to justify the $7500 price tag he had on his machines. People are not going to pay that for a fixed frequency machine that cost them less than $10 to build.
I build my own so I know that they are truly cold corona. And for some of the experiments I do I need a higher concentration of ozone than the commercial units put out. But one of the posters on my forum bought a Synergy machine, which was a good price and sounds like a good unit from what i have seen:
Oxygen you can get from a welding supply. All oxygen has to medical grade in the US by law. You can rent or buy a tank and you will have to buy an oxygen regulator. They do not rent regulators.
As for diffusers go to a aquarium supply and get the little, white plastic aquarium diffusers. These create pretty fine bubbles and hold up to the ozone well.
The synergy generator is very good, but it is not a cold corona design.
I have used a cold corona generator as well, and the synergy performs just as well.
Never use air fed generators ever.
For injecting ozone you should use pure oxygen from a tank, but for saunas, insufflation, ozonating water, ozonating oil, or funneling, a good oxygen concentrator is fine. these will produce upwards of 90-95% pure oxygen. Oxygen concentrators are infinitely more convenient than refilling a heavy tank.
Hver, the humidifier we purchased has a diffuser at the end of the glass tube that seems to be adhered to the glass. How do we take it off so we can use the white, plastic diffuser you recommend? Thanking you in advance. :>
Home
Oxygen Vs Alkaline Therapies: The Truth! 
