Lasse Moer,
Japan and South Korea are much clearer examples of in-country which has consistently and very direct dismissed multiculturalism. This was established on 70-, 80-, 90es and this confirms day by day. The United Nations has through many years tried to press them to receive refugees but the number of refugees has been one thousands of what UN asked for.
Europe has never elected to drive psychological or economic warfare against them (Japan and South Korea) for this reason (as they do against European nations/individuals with same arguments and principles)
Multiculturalists are extremely uncomfortable when you mention Japan and South Korea cause these nations prove quite openly that mass-immigration only is a result of specific Marxistiske doctrines and very rarely economically or culturally beneficial. Japan/South Korea has a limit and border guards.
If one lacks the visa one is denied entry ... ( Europe used to have similar laws prior 1950-1960 )
The interesting question is:
Why are not Japanese and South Koreans demonized as the Nazis and fascists?
Message posted on document.no by Anders Behring Breivik
on 2010-02-17 10:56:52
The problem is that it often does not help that about 80% of Muslims are "moderates", if they ignore the Quran.
"It takes very few people to blow a plane."
What percentage of Pakistan's population are Taliban?
1%, 3%, 5%?
And how much chaos is there today?
In every society where Islam exists there will be a certain percentage of Muslims who actually follow the traditional interpretations of the Koran.
And then we have the relationship between conservative Muslims and so-called "moderate Muslims".
There are moderate Nazis, too, that do not support massmurder of Roms and Jews. But they're still Nazis and will only sit and watch as the conservative Nazis strike (if it ever happens).
Are we going to accept moderate Nazis as long as they distance themselves from the massmurder of Roms and Jews?
Now they have unfortunately already mixed themselves with Marxists who have already infiltrated-culture, media and educational organizations. These individuals will be tolerated and will even work as professors and lecturers at colleges / universities and are thus able to spread their propaganda.
For me it is very hypocritical to treat Muslims, Nazis and Marxists differently. They are all supporters of hate-ideologies.
Not all Muslims, Nazis and Marxists are conservative, most are moderate. But does it matter? A moderate Nazi might, after having experienced fraud, choose to be conservative. A moderate Muslim can, after being refused to enter a club, be conservative, etc.
It is obvious that the moderate supporters of hate-ideologies, at a later date may choose conservatism.
Islam (ism) has historically led to 300 million deaths
Communism has historically led to 100 million deaths
Nazism has historically led to 6-20 million deaths
According to two studies, 13% of young British Muslims between 15 and 25 support Al Qaeda ideology.
UK is representative for Norway, so I would guess that at least 15-20% of Norwegian Muslims support murder of homosexuals.
There is certainly no fewer who support killing of homosexuals, than those who support Al Qaeda.
2010-02-02 13:35:11
I completely agree that Obama is a brilliant retoriker and communicator, one of the best we've seen over the past 30 years.
But firstly, we can not and should not compare the cultural struggle in the U.S. with that in Europe.
Rhetoric must and should be different. The average "right oriented" - Republican in the U.S. is a "libertarian" (anti-socialist but pro multikulti) while the average conservative in Europe is much more anti-multikulti but arguments based on cultural resistance against Islamization.
The so-called anti-multiculti in the U.S. based their rhetoric on ethnocentrism alone which thus differs greatly from Europeans.
This is the main reason that we must separate the American and European cultural struggle. I usually stay away from American issues as a result.
Regardless of whether we are in the U.S. or Europe, it is essential you have to ask about the following:
When was that multiculturalism ceased to be an ideology designed to deconstruct a European culture, traditions, identity and nation-states?
If you support a leader who propagate multiculturalism (ideology as of this writing systematically deconstructs Western civilization), one can not then just as well stick to the class struggle or the MSM?
And if we then think that multiculturalism wonderful doctrines is the main cause of the ongoing Islamization of Europe and the U.S., one should not criticize multiculturalism while leading No. 1, the one Jesus Christ Obama for his fundamental principles?
If you fail to criticize him, haven't you then accepted the multiculturalism wonderful premise?
Only a few days ago Anders set up a Twitter account and posted a single message: 'One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100,000 who have only interests'.
It is attributed to the English philosopher John Stuart Mill, whose concept of liberty justified the freedom of the individual in opposition to unlimited state control.
What you manage to come up with here is nothing but very nasty power control techniques.
You claim that all Norwegians who do not follow Landsmo's container Gro Harlem Brundtland definition, are racist:
"Everyone who has a Norwegian passport is fully valued Norwegian"
... Which means that even a Somali (with a Norwegian passport) who chews khat all day, who beats his wife and sends half of his money to al-Shabaab should be viewed as a full-blooded Norwegian?
According to you, anyone in this country who dares to look at the Somali as anything other than a full-Norwegian is racists and need to be iron-branded in public?
And you say that everyone who disagrees with your extreme kultur-Marxistic world view - the utopian, global citizen definition, is racists?
In that case, I think you have labeled 95% of the world population exactly that ( racists ) but they (95%) just play a minor role, according to you?
You are only committed to paralyze all the debate in society, to silence all those who are not of the same opinion as you, to exercise social control in line with the conservative Muslims in Greenland?
As soon as a person takes off his "ideological hijab" that is where you are with your ideological gang to gang them, the troll you are.
Sorry, but it does not work anymore. More and more people will be increasingly immune to your rule techniques due to the massive inflation of your rhetoric.
I think the majority of Norwegians expect full cultural assimilation (European culture) to count all others as full Norwegians.
The analysis of Hans is thus correct.
Norwegian passport is irrelevant in this context. Get over it ...!
:-)
2010-01-24 10:45:19
The problem with the Progress Party (FrP) have become that in their strugle to reach out to the multiculturalist standards and humanisms suicidal ideals, they have in many ways thrown out the baby with the bath water.
Genuine resistance has been reduced to listening to the PR agency and do 2-3 tactical statements before each election, to ensure the votes from the majority.
The vast majority of new faces in the Progress Party (Frp) is now politically correct career politicians and not in any way idealists who are willing to take risks and work for idealistic goals.
The funny thing is that even though they have thrown almost all principles onto the garbage and reduced cultural struggle to "reduce the flow of asylum seekers to a few thousands", they are still burn-branded in public, ridiculed, harassed and isolated by the humanist-Marxist.
Parliamentary Representatives from the Progress Party (Frp), should at least read the document every single day and involved a bit when it is their duty to be the people's voice. Unfortunately, very few of them at all know what the document.no is about, and fewer than 5% of them know what "taqiyya" and "naskh" is.
F eksempel. når en samlet presse valgte å ignorere den Svenske og Franske intifadaen før forrige valg av strategiske årsaker, noe som senere kostet FrP kanskje 5%, burde Siv ha instruert alle sine folk om å ringe ned ARK og andre nyhetsredaksjoner og presset dem til å dekke dette om dette.
For example, when a combined force chose to ignore the Swedish and French intifada before the last election due to strategic reasons, which later cost FrP maybe 5% of votes, shouldn't have Siv (FrP leader) instructed all of her people to call the ARK and other newsrooms and press them to cover this?
De er sinnssykt flittige, dyktige på konsolidering og hardt-arbeidende og de fleste på høyresiden har mye å lære av dem.
They are insanely hard-working, skilled in the consolidation and hard-working and most on the right side has a lot to learn from them.
Det som dere presterer å komme med her er ikke noe annet enn svært stygge hersketeknikker.
Dere påstår at alle nordmenn som ikke følger landsmo(r)deren Gro Harlem Brundtlands definisjon, er rasister:
"Alle som til enhver tid innehar Norsk pass er fullverdige Nordmenn"... Som betyr at selv Somalieren (med norsk pass) som tygger khat hele dagen, banker kona og sender halve trygden til al-Shabaab skal sees på som en fullverdig Nordmann.
Hvis noen i dette landet VÅGER å se på denne Somalieren som noe annet enn en fullverdig Nordmann er de rasister og må brennmerkes offentlig. Og dere sier at alle som er uenig med deres ekstreme kulturmarxistiske verdensoppfatning - den utopiske, verdensborger-definisjonen er rasister?
I så fall tror jeg dere har stemplet 95% av verdens befolkning som nettopp dette men det spiller vel en mindre rolle for dere?
Dere er kun opptatt av å paralysere all debatt i samfunnet, å kneble alle som ikke er av samme oppfatning som dere, å utøve sosial kontroll på lik linje med de konservative Muslimene på Grønland? Så snart en person tar av seg den "ideologiske hijaben" sin er dere der med en gang som det trollet dere er.
Beklager, men det fungerer ikke lenger. Flere blir i økende grad immune mot hersketeknikkene deres pga massiv inflasjon i retorikken.
Jeg tror flertallet av Nordmenn krever full kulturell assimilering (Europeisk kultur) for å regne andre som fullverdige Nordmenn. Hans sin analyse er således korrekt. Norsk pass er irrelevant i denne sammenheng. Get over it...!
:-)
2010-01-24 10:45:19
Problemet med FrP etterhvert har blitt at i deres etterstrebenhet etter å nå opp til de multikulturalistiske krav og humanismens suisidale idealer har de på mange måter kastet ut babyen med badevannet.
Genuin motstand har blitt redusert til å lytte til PR-byrået og gjøre 2-3 taktiske uttalelser før hvert valg, for å sikre seg stemmene til kjernen.
De aller fleste nye fjesene i FrP er i dag politisk korrekte karrierepolitikere og ikke på noen måte idealister som er villig til å ta risiko eller jobbe for idealistiske mål.
Det komiske er at selv om de har kastet så og si alle prinsipper på søppeldynga og redusert kulturkampen til å "redusere asylstrømmen med et par tusen" blir de fortsatt brennmerket offentlig, latterliggjort, plaget og isolert av humanist-marxistene.
Stortingsrepresentanter fra FrP, burde i det minste lest document hver eneste dag og engasjert seg litt da det er deres plikt å være folkets talerør. Dessverre er det svært få av dem som i det hele tatt vet hva document er for noe, og færre enn 5% av dem vet hva taqiyya og naskh er.
F eksempel. når en samlet presse valgte å ignorere den Svenske og Franske intifadaen før forrige valg av strategiske årsaker, noe som senere kostet FrP kanskje 5%, burde Siv ha instruert alle sine folk om å ringe ned ARK og andre nyhetsredaksjoner og presset dem til å dekke dette om dette.
Jeg har stor respekt for hvordan Marxist-humanist nettverkene i Norge klarer å benytte makten sin optimalt gjennom "force multiplication" og samarbeid.
De er sinnssykt flittige, dyktige på konsolidering og hardt-arbeidende og de fleste på høyresiden har mye å lære av dem.
"I decided that if he comes, I would play dead. I would not run or swim. I can not describe the fear, all of my thoughts, what I felt.
One man came. "I'm from the police."
I was lying. Some shouted back that he had to prove it. I do not remember exactly what he said, but the killer started shooting with gun.
He reloaded his gun. He was shooting more. He shot those around me. I was lying. I thought:
"Now it's over. He's here. He is going to get me. Now I'm dying."
People screamed. I heard that others were shot. Others jumped into the water and tried swimming. I was still laying there. The mobile phone in my hand.
I lay on top of the legs of a girl. Two other girls were on top of me. I was lying. I received a message on my Cell Phone .
The mobile phone rang several times.
I was lying quiet. I played dead.
I lay there for at least an hour.
It was completely quiet. I gently turned my head to see if I could see someone alive. I saw a body. I saw blood. Fear. I decided to stand up. I had been lying on top of a dead body. Two bodies were lying on top of me. I had a guardian angel.
He didn't like islamic incursions into Europe and socialist/marxist ideology. The kids he shot were attending a leftist camp. It will be very interesting to hear what he has to say for himself.
Deepest sympathies to you and all the people of Norway. It makes me wonder how low can someone go. I hope that the good people of your country can find peace and hope amidst the trauma.
Inside the mind of Anders Behring Breivik (32)
Home
Inside the mind of Anders Behring Breivik (32)
Video uploaded by Anders Behring Breivik: Knights Templar 2083
by Webmaster
22 mon
3,723
