Funny all your proof stufies are from those who make a livin slicin and dicen! Establishment propaganda we've all heard before! green blobs are fecal matter! Now thats a proclamation! lmao what an idiotic thing for the estblishment to put out! It shows how little respect they have for the masses who they are in the process and business of culling!
Chaz you can only invoke Conspiracy theory so far. Since I have yet to see a gastroenterologist perform a cholecystectomy I will have to disagree with you.
Thank you for confiriming that you cannot persuaded no matter what the evidence tho.
why don't you post the article? or scan the contents? It seems to me that if you were really interested in supporting your insitence that the globs are oil, you would do so. not very helpful to post the title of an article that says god knows what.
Literally hundreds, if not thousands more accounts of analyzed stones can be found on other sites simply by spending some quality hours with Google or your favorite search engine.
The overwhelming ingredient in the green stones is cholesterol, with bile, bilirubin, calcium, and protein appearing on occasion. The variations depend on the history of the patient, the condition of the liver and gallbladder, calcification level of the stones, and other similar sorts of variables.
Interestingly, allopathic medicine likes to say that bile *is* fecal matter.
trapper read the article -you can always contact the author. on the other hand what documentation is there for most of the beliefs on this site? virtually nil!
if you're too lazy to go to a medical library, its hardly my fault. I at least read the whole paper unlike the posters here that post a link to an abstract - right! really intellectually rigorous that!
of course your criticism that I am avoiding the issue you raised is rather ironic isn't it johng?
don't worry, article on order. i'll be back with, you can bet on it. as for you avoiding the points raised by others, i don't see irony at all. i don't see any other option for you.
I can answer any sensible point - the reason being is I know how the body works and some of the people here have some very strange ideas. Try looking at an atlas of anatomy first of all I suggest.
this guy is a fol he post one stupid pathetic claim by some jerk and play off it for weeks evidence so light and iffy , yet real evidence we offer here is no good to him what a complete moron!Dredge the depths of the sludge pond, is a better name for the brainless med student!
i have experimented on myself and have firsthand knowledge of many of the things on this website. I am my own documentation. my assessment? Science could definitively study and find a cure for everything. why dont they? no money in it. unless i get into an accident and need sewn back together, i will never see another doctor except the one who pronounces me dead. fack, jack.
It blows my mind that any of us waste time debating with closed-minded medical personnel/students through digital text. I can't even believe that I am going to waste my time writing this message to debate this. Here's my medical report:
GLOBS OR STONES?
• After discovering I had gallstones, I decided to perform my first liver flush. Approx 75 "globs" (not Gallstones [ahem]) were passed, and my pain went away.
• A few weeks later, as some of the irritation came back (a little), I decided to perform my second flush. About 125 "globs" were passed.
• A month later, flush #3 produced only about 30-50 "globs", though 5 or 6 were big (over 2cm). I had some irritation for a few days in the gallbladder area, though it healed just fine. It seems to me that the larger "globs" caused more irritation in my upper right abdomen than the smaller "globs". But if they are just "globs", why did they cause slight irritation in my gallbladder area?
• Fourth flush, only "globs" during the first bowel movement of the next day. No more "globs" while I passed the waste.
• Fifth flush, no "globs". None at all. Why wouldn't I get "globs" if the procedure was exactly the same? I mean, if it is just fecal matter or oily "globs", why none this time? Why, I ask, why? Seems to me like I have successfully removed lots of "globs" from my liver/gallbladder. Oh wait, but they are formed in the lower digestive tract, right? They are formed when the olive oil meets the feces, right?
Curezone soldiers, stand your ground. We have power; power that is better spent being productive than getting angry at closed-minded medical "quacks".
There are many tests proving that the "globs" passed during liver flushes are actually stones, mostly composed of cholesterol. The official information is all over the place.
Those "globs" are stones. Hands down.
"Knowledge base, get this medical student/staffer 5 million CCs of open-minded thought, STAT!"
hmmm...this is a really simple answer....your body has adjusted to this. this is not the first time too many flushes have resulted in nothing. but just in case, i'd certainly have a culture run just in case, you might of stripped your intestines full of what is supposed to be there....
i've experienced an aweful yeast infection of the bowel and it was NOT fun....i now flush once a year and thats it!
My post was just to share my story of how the same flushing procedure has yielded stones/no stones and that if the stones were just globs of oil and feces, why they wouldn't form this time around. But you have peaked my interest with your post.
I am curious to what you mean by saying that I "might of stripped your intestines full of what is supposed to be there". I understand that healthy flora and such are necessary for proper digestion, though what else could I have stripped? Are the things that are "supposed to be there" removed during flushes, and if so, why would these essentials be removed after just four flushes when others perform 25+ flushes in less than a year?
I take a probiotic everyday and eat plenty of raw, organic veggies and other nutrient-rich foods. I haven't had any problems with movements, which fall in the normal range of 2-3 per day. You don't think that it's possible that I may have just passed all of my stones, or at least all that were able to be removed?
I am interested in your feedback, and thanks for posting.
yep its possible that you have gotten rid of everything ingested and that is why your not producing stones...i thought i had put that in there, but i'm also watching myth busters lol...anyway....
my naturopathic buddy suggests only once per year flush. the reason being is simple...too much of a good thing...and i learned the hard way with one hell of a yeast infection in the gut...it was aweful...and i thought cayenne pepper hurt!
anyway...he has also told me that people respond differently to flushes/cleanses...(he calls them all flushes, because cleanses is just a more nice of a word for "flushes"...anyway...he said it depends alot on diet...some may not pass anything because their bodies are "tuned" by proper diet. I used to juice alot until my skin turned orange....yes, orange. My NP buddy suggest you can eat anything you want, as long as it is in moderation.
Did you know steamed veggies are easier to digest than raw? It could be you got rid of excess "rouphage". just a thought.
Doesn't explain why people get stones for a series of flushes, then get none for a series of flushes, and then go back to getting stone for a series of flushes. So, according to your theory, the body keeps adjusting and re-adjusting. Wow, that's alot of re-adjusting!
Home
green blobs 
