Online Health & Wellness Newsletter Issue 9
(Free, Non-commercial newsletter!)
Feel free to forward this newsletter to other email groups!
If you would like to subscribe, please email: curezone-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
*****************************************
A doctor diagnosed me as having AIDS
by Wes Bennett
http://www.knowledgeisthecure.com/my_story.htm
In 1989, at the age of nineteen, I was diagnosed HIV positive. I had gone to have the test done at the advice of a friend who had watched my health decline rapidly over the previous year. The two weeks waiting for my test results were an eternity of anxiety. My state of health (mental and physical) at the time was not very good. I had been unemployed for a short time and had not been eating right or taking any measures to better my health. The day I received my test results, I weighed 125 pounds. Being six feet tall, I can only imagine how bad I must have looked. At the time, it looked as if I would live no more than a year, maybe two.
Over the next year, I battled with depression and numerous illnesses. I had a severe case of eczema that covered my whole body and lasted over six months and several bouts of what I can only describe now as severe bronchitis and respiratory infection. I never had a doctor to diagnose this bronchitis, being unaware that I could receive any medical assistance. I knew that I certainly couldn’t afford to see a doctor on my own. Friends took care of me on and off as best they knew how. I spent the next six months moving from one place to another and working at different odd jobs and had dropped out of college. It was too much to handle with all that was happening.
After some time had passed, I had to break down and tell my parents that I was dying. They were very understanding and supportive, but also emotionally devastated. I moved back home to live near my family. They helped me as much as they could with their love and support. I was able to get state medical assistance after a doctor diagnosed me as having AIDS. My T-cell count was below 200 and I’d had numerous infections. Immediately, my doctor started me on AZT, Bactrim, and Pentamidine inhalant treatments. My health seemed to improve for a short time. My blood tests fluctuated and showed minimal signs of improvement. I did feel emotionally more stable and like maybe I might live a little longer than I thought. I became more interested in my own health care. I wanted to know more and learn more about this disease and how they were treating it. I asked my health care providers all the questions I could. They answered all the questions they wanted to.
When I inquired as to the side effects of all these pharmaceuticals I was putting into my body, I was told that I may experience some nausea and maybe some headaches. If I noticed any other things happening I should let them know. Well, that wasn’t a good enough answer for me, nor a good response to the question I had asked. They neglected to tell me that these chemicals they were using to try to repair my damaged immune system were in themselves immune suppressing substances. I didn’t realize at the time, but later discovered that many people were dying simply because AZT had damaged their immune systems beyond repair. The next time I got a fresh bottle of AZT, I kept and read the medical insert that accompanied it. I did the same with my other medications. I came to discover words like neurotoxicity. When I looked into it, I found that neurotoxicity means "this will be toxic to your nervous system and/or your brain". I also discovered that I would experience possible kidney damage, liver damage, and numerous other side effects that I wasn't told about beforehand. I was upset and angry that these people who were supposed to be taking care of me were giving me these poisons. They had no good explanation as to why they neglected to tell me these things. My faith in the medical community began to fade.
In the winter of ‘91, I had the opportunity to move to New York City and live with a friend. My health was not improving and I knew that I would probably never get this chance again. I moved, taking only clothes and a few boxes of necessities. I continued on AZT for a few more months, but the nausea and weakness were really getting to me. I knew that there had to be a better way. Being in such a cultural center as NYC, I began to hear a lot on the debate of different effective treatments for HIV and AIDS. I kept seeing people dying left and right from things as simple as a cold. I remembered my mother, in her trying to deal with my illness, saying, "who knows, maybe you’ll be one who is able to find a cure". Well, a cure was not something I thought myself capable of ....a successful means of treatment, maybe. A cure was the "magic bullet" that even the doctors and scientists could not come up with.
I started researching for myself and started looking into alternative therapies. My doctor frowned upon this type of research. Alternative therapies, after all, were "unproved" and not endorsed by the medical community. Nevertheless, the more I looked, the more people were living, and living a healthy life by using these "unproved" methods. The more I researched, the more I came across references to "no FDA approval." Well, I didn’t need a medical license to see which group of people were living healthy and which group were slowly and painfully dying. I talked to people and read a couple of books on some basic but effective alternative therapies. These people were determined to live. They told me that if I wanted to live a long healthy life, it was going to be totally up to me, and they were right. I quit taking AZT when I came to the end of the last bottle. My doctor advised against it and suggested that I stay with the "more proven" methods of treatment. I knew that the "more proven" methods my doctor referred to were not truly proven to do anything! I didn’t see anyone living more than a couple of years beyond their initial diagnosis, if that long. Those who did live longer were emaciated and constantly sick and on numerous medications. That’s not the quality of life I wanted to have. The medicines that they could offer me were, in my eyes, only experimental. If I was going to be a living experiment in the treatment of this disease, I was going to be the one to take responsibility for my life.
Since my decision to take my health care into my own hands, I have gained forty five pounds (I now weigh 170 pounds). I've seen an increase in my T-cell count (up to 500) and a year ago tested p24 antigen negative and my latest viral load test registered at "below detectable" levels! I did not test negative for the HIV antibodies, as antibodies often remain in your system even after an illness is gone. Even though a person may not have an illness, their blood will still show antibodies for that illness if they have ever been inoculated or had that particular illness. Today, my health and quality of life are far more than I ever expected to see. I never expected to live this long when I first learned I had AIDS and if by some miracle I did live, I didn’t expect to be this healthy. I cannot take credit for all the miracles that happened with my health. Even though the treatments that I use have been here on earth for millennia, I would not have found them if I had not asked God to show me the way. All I had to do was ask.
Unfortunately, most members of the medical community are not able to answer questions regarding alternative therapies. They are bound by the American Medical Association and the Food and Drug Administration to uphold the current research findings on all methods of treatment. Virtually no FDA approved research has been done on alternative therapies. Therefore, we have to rely on everyday people who have had success with these methods and doctors and scientists willing to tell the truth about the research they have initiated on their own. Many people have asked me why the FDA will not approve the use of natural and alternative therapies. The answer is pretty simple. For a substance to be approved by the FDA for human consumption in this country, it must go through as much as $200 million (often more) worth of research first.
Because you cannot patent a natural substance (vitamin C for example), there would be no way to make enough money on it to make it worth investigating. The ugly truth is that pharmaceutical companies are in business to make money. If they weren’t, they would be non-profit organizations! As it is today, the pharmaceutical industry is a multi-billion dollar a year industry. Why would they want to go and invest in a product they would lose money on? That would hardly be a lucrative business tactic. Instead they have made efforts to get around this in the last few years. They are currently trying to make food supplements into "prescription only" items. The way the patent laws work, a natural substance is not able to be patented; however, you can file for a "use patent" on any substance that is natural. When someone holds a "use patent" on a substance it means that they have researched and determined a certain "use" of the product.
Therefore, in the last few years we have witnessed FDA officials go on television and proclaim "food supplements are dangerous in high doses and should be better regulated, because at present no regulation exists." Some of these same high ranking FDA officials and a few other members of our government have purchased "use patents" on many of the best selling vitamins and supplements. They are waiting for the laws to pass making food supplements prescription only items. If you think this sounds far-fetched, this law was almost passed last year and several other times in the past! Thankfully it did not, but these people are still in power and are not going to let a few billion dollars get away. They will try again.
The following pages on my web site include the different methods of treatment that I use. I have also included a short list of books that have helped me along in my search for a better way. I do not suggest anyone to rush in to a method of health care they are not familiar with. Before changing your current method of treatment, or starting on a new path of therapy, please do lots of research and understand fully the treatment methods you choose before you begin using them.
The following are methods of alternative therapies that have helped me to stay healthy:
Table of contents: http://www.ascent.net/wesbenn/Health/tablcont.htm
____________________________________________________________
Water: http://www.ascent.net/wesbenn/Health/water.htm
Vitamin C http://www.ascent.net/wesbenn/Health/vitaminc.htm
Aloe Vera http://www.ascent.net/wesbenn/Health/aloevera.htm
Hyperthermia http://www.ascent.net/wesbenn/Health/hyprthrm.htm
Oxygen http://www.ascent.net/wesbenn/Health/oxygen.htm
Exercise http://www.ascent.net/wesbenn/Health/exercise.htm
Nutrition http://www.ascent.net/wesbenn/Health/nutrtion.htm
_____________________________________________________________
As with conventional medicine, not all methods work for all people. Unfortunately some people are beyond the help of alternative therapies due to the extensive damage already done by conventional, immune suppressing drugs. If you are currently on medication, take the time to study what you are putting in your body, and ask your doctor if your prescription is an immune boosting or an immune suppressing chemical.
All of my chosen methods of treatment are immune boosting substances and practices. Every immune suppressing substance that you put in your body is a step backward in your fight toward recovery. If your health care professional does not agree with this last statement, you need to ask yourself why!
I truly wish that no one should have to die for a lack of knowledge. Unfortunately, there have been many thousands of people lost to AIDS in such a very short time. Many of these people who have been lost did not have to die. I truly believe that they died due to the priority that money has been given over the health of the people. I have to wonder what would happen if someone actually discovered a naturally occurring substance that was a "miracle cure" that would end all types of cancer, AIDS, colds, flu, etc. Would this cure be released into the public domain if it meant that multi-billion dollar per year pharmaceutical companies, the government officials that get kickbacks, and most all doctors would be financially devastated?. It sounds a little far-fetched, but try to imagine.
The medical industry is the biggest business in the US. Would virtually trillions of dollars a year be allowed to be lost due to this "magic bullet cure"? Some people have answered that question with "yes". That’s a nice thought, but is it logical or even realistic to think that the wealthiest, greediest people in the world would allow their fortunes to be lost to a simple natural substance that could make them no money? Even if there were a cure for the simple cold, would it be released? The major drug companies make multi-millions of dollars a year on pills to mask symptoms of the common cold. Why would they go and cure something that makes them so much money? I realize that a good majority of our doctors have only the best intentions and our health in mind. However, there are those in power, who have only one priority, money. We find ourselves in a position of having to find our own means of surviving. I have found myself listening more to those scientists and researchers who are not financially motivated than the ones who have much to gain by synthesizing a new chemical.
I will continue to live and learn the best natural ways to survive. We were not put on this planet to wither and die. We were given all the tools necessary to thrive without synthetic chemicals. Clean water, oxygen, good food, vitamins, herbs, and even hot baths are naturally occurring. These things have been around for millennia. With today’s research and expanded communications we are able to make the best use of different positive health measures from around the world. I urge you to take the time to further study natural methods of living healthy lives. If you have found any natural methods of healing that you have had great success with, I would be interested in hearing about them. Please feel free to send me any information that you think might be useful in future publications.
"You Don’t Have to Die: Unraveling the AIDS Myth", by Leon Chaitow, N.D., D.O. and James Strohecker with the Burton Goldberg Group. 1994. Future Medicine Publishing, Puyallup, Washington. $14.95.
"O2xygen Therapies: A New Way of Approaching Disease", by Ed McCabe. 1988. Energy Publications, Morrisville, NY. $12.00
"Stop the FDA: Save Your Health Freedom", Articles by Linus Pauling, Ph.D., Abram Hoffer, MD, Sherry Rogers, MD, Ward Dean, MD, Senator Orrin Hatch, Durk Pearson and Sandy Shaw, & many more. 1992. A Health Freedom Publication, Menlo Park, California. $9.95.
"The Anarchist AIDS Medical Formulary: A Guide To Guerrilla Immunology", Selected Essays by Charles Caulfield with Billi Goldberg. 1993. North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, California. $12.95
"New Choices in Natural Healing: Over 1,800 of the Best Self-Help Remedies from the World of Alternative Medicine", Edited by Bill Gottlieb, Editor-in-Chief, Prevention Magazine Health Books. 1995, Rodale Press, Inc., Emmaus, Pennsylvania. $27.95.
"Staying Healthy with HIV: A Guide To Alternative and Complementary Therapies", by David Baker, RN, MSN, and Richard Copeland. First Edition, March, 1993. Aardvark Design, Hayward, California.
"Hydrogen Peroxide Therapy", by Conrad LeBeau. Newly Revised 10th Edition. Vital Health. Hales Corner, WI 53130. $3.50
==================================================================
Paper by W. Lyman, et a1. Reporting Inactivation of AIDS Virus by Electric Curr
or
http://www.papimi.gr/safe-hiv/AppendixE.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/microelectricitygermkiller/
Dear Sir/Madam.
i write to inform you that the treatment for Aids was actually discovered 10 years ago and involved passing a small electrical current of 100 microamperes through the infected blood and this disabled the aids virus.
As this method did not involve the use of drugs the pharmaceutical companies who are very powerful managed to suppress any attempts to bring this to
mainstream usage.As a result of this the original research paper only appeared in 3 publications and has not been allowed to be mentioned again.
A man called Robert Beck actually implemented the cure using electrodes attached to the wrist and passing a small current through them.you can find out more by typing Robert Beck in web browser or 'blood electrification'.
The pharmaceutical companies would lose a lot of money if the method was used on a large scale and they are maintaining their drive to stop manufacture of the beck device by shutting down jaguer enterprises last week as they manufactured these devices.
Your position allows you to bring this information to a wider audience and i ask you to study this for yourself and help the many people who are suffering from Aids , Cancer , Malaria and Typhoid both in the U.k. and in third world countries as well.
I understand the incidence is 1 in 3 now for cancer now.
Last year 126000 people died fom cancer in the u.k.
last night i heard the playwright Harold Pinter had it.
George Harrisons £140 million fortune did not save him as the doctors did not tell him and used the most advanced chemotherapy instead.Remember cancers are caused by bacteria and viruses.
The method can also be applied to cancer causing viruses.Remember the passing of a small electrical current of between 50 to 100 microamperes disables the virus and the very low cost of such a method has resulted in its suppresssion as the drug companies would lose billions as their expensive drugs are sidestepped.
the device can be made easily by using four 9 volts batteries in series and a variable resistor to adjust the current plus wet cloth covered 1 cm square electrodes taped to each of the pulse points on each wrist.
you can find more detailed information if you type blood electrication in your web browser.
i am not selling you anything.
the research paper is detailed below and is available on the internet at:-
http://www.papimi.gr/safe-hiv/AppendixE.htm
yours sincerely.
dr callum
Positive electricity experiments on HIV-1 virus.Lab Test
Results of HIV inactivation by electric current from patent 5,139,684 (of
Kaali & Schwolsky 8-18-92)
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Overview: A non-flow vessel or cell included a pair of platinum electrodes
1 mm apart inserted into a well 1.56 mm in length and 8.32 mm in depth.
The non-flow vessel was connected to a direct current source capable of
creating an electric field at a constant voltage and constant amperage.
Into this well was laced a suspension of the human immunodeficiency virus
type 1 (HIV-1) at a concentration of 1,000,000 infectious particles per
ml. An aliquot of approximately 10 ul of the virus suspension was placed
into the well. Thereafter, the viral suspension was exposed to direct
currents ranging from 0 microamps (uA) for up to 12 minutes, to 100
microamps for up to 6 minutes. Intermediate currents of 25, 50 and 75
microamps were used to expose similar viral aliquots. After exposure of
the viral suspension to electric currents, the contents of the non-flow
vessel were removed and placed into sterile microtubes. 5 ul of each
sample were removed and diluted with 95 ul tissue culture medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS. unborn calf blood)
In Experiment 1, the resuspended and treated viral stocks were incubated
with a human T lymphoblastoid cell line named CEM-SS. This cell line, upon
exposure to HIV-1, forms syncytia (giant cells). It is well documented
that the viral titer (amount) used is directly correlated with the number
of syncytia formed. Therefore, evaluation of infectivity of HIV-1 can be
used with this assay. In contrast, Experiment No. 2 used a differnet human
T lymphoblastoid cell line named H9. This cell line, in contrast to CEM-SS
cells, produces, upon exposure to HIV-1, many viral particles. The amount
of virus produced is proportional to the amount of virus to which the
cells are exposed. Therefore, quantitation of viral particles, or more
commonly associated viral protein (in this case reverse transcriptase),
can be used as an index of viral infection. In both assays, the CEM
syncytia forming assay and the H9 viral protein assay, similar type
results were obtained. That is, with the CEM cells, although syncytium
formation and quantitation is preferrable, one can quantitate the HIV-1
associated protein (reverse transcriptase) activity and conversely with
the H9 cells, although reverse transcriptase quantitation is preferred,
one can quantitate giant cell (syncytia) formation. Both of these assays
are widely used as reproducible measures of viral infection and can be
used to determine if alterations in viral infectivity as a product of this
electrical treatment can be detected.
Experiment #1
Approximately 100,000 CEM-SS cells per sample were incubated with a
treated or untreated (control) viral aliquot for up to 4 days. The cells
were placed into microtiter plate wells and monitored for formation of
syncytia every 24 hours by microscopic observation. In a standardized
fashion, as it has been reported in the literature and is currently being
conducted in many laboratories, the number of syncytia at 3 and 4 days was
determined. Table 2 summarizes the results from a representative
experiment using this assay. As can be noted, the number of syncytia
formed was inversely proportional to the amount of electric current. That
is, additionally, with increased current (100 vs 50 uA) there was a
reduction in the number of syncytia formed. These results and those of
additional experiments using the CEM-SS cell line indicate a consistent
finding that electrical treatment of the RF strain of HIV-1 attentuates
the virus potential for inducing syncytium formation in this cell line.
Experiment #2
A separate and independent assay to determine the ability of electric
current to alter HIV-1 infectivity using H9 cells was employed. The basic
strategy was similar to that used for the CEM cells with the exception
that the initial suspension of treated and controlled (non-treated) viral
stock was incubated with 100,000 H9 cells for 2 hours at 37 degees
Celsius. Thereafter, the cell virus suspensions were further diluted to 5
ml in standard tissue culture medium. The cell-viral suspensions were then
incubated for up to 14 days at 37 degrees Celsius with 5% carbon dioxide.
At 3 day intervals (beginning at day 2), aliquots of cell suspension were
removed from each sample. The aliquots were centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 5
minutes in order to pellet the cells. After centrifugation, the
supernatant and cell pellets were seperated. The supernatant was
cyropreserved for subsequent reverse transcriptase assay and the cell
pellets were resuspended in fixatives and maintained in a tissue bank for
additional studies employing in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry
to detect qualitatively and semi-qualitatively viral infection by HIV-1.
At the end of each experiment, the supernatant samples from each of the
tests and time points were examined using standard reverse transcriptase
assay. The results of the representative experiment are shown in Table 3.
The results of this experiment indicate the ability of HIV-1 to infect H9
cells is attenuated by the magnitude of the electrical currents to which
the virus is exposed. Additionally, at lower current magnitude, but with
prolonged exposure time, attenuation of viral infectivity is achieved.
That is, analogous to the results observed using syncytium formation and
the CEM-SS cell line, either increased current or increased duration of
exposure time was inversely proportional to the amount of reverse
transcriptase produced by the cell line.
In conclusion, these experiments which have been repeated several times,
and those using the CEM-SS cell line, indicate at a statistically
significant level that direct electrical current at biocompatible
amperages for discrete exposure time intervals can attenuate the ability
of HIV-1 to infect normally healthy cells which are susceptible to the
HIV-1 AIDS virus.
TABLE 3
Reverse Transcriptase Activity
(count per million x .001)
-------------------------------------
Days of Incubation
------------------
uAmps/Time(min.) 2 days 4 days
---------------- ------- ------
0/6 0 13.8
0/12 0 11.7
50/3 0 9.1
50/6 0 9.1
50/12 0 4.8
100/3 0 5.7
100/6 0 3.6
------------------------------------
Click here to read about an electro-medical device that puts electricity
into the blood for the inactivation (decreased infectivity) of HIV and
other microbes
Lab Test Results of HIV inactivation by electric current from patent 5,139,684 (of Kaali & Schwolsky 8-18-92)
Overview: A non-flow vessel or cell included a pair of platinum electrodes 1 mm apart inserted into a well 1.56 mm in length and 8.32 mm in depth. The non-flow vessel was connected to a direct current source capable of creating an electric field at a constant voltage and constant amperage. Into this well was laced a suspension of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) at a concentration of 1,000,000 infectious particles per ml. An aliquot of approximately 10 ul of the virus suspension was placed into the well. Thereafter, the viral suspension was exposed to direct currents ranging from 0 microamps (uA) for up to 12 minutes, to 100 microamps for up to 6 minutes. Intermediate currents of 25, 50 and 75 microamps were used to expose similar viral aliquots. After exposure of the viral suspension to electric currents, the contents of the non-flow vessel were removed and placed into sterile microtubes. 5 ul of each sample were removed and diluted with 95 ul tissue culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS. unborn calf blood)
In Experiment 1, the resuspended and treated viral stocks were incubated with a human T lymphoblastoid cell line named CEM-SS. This cell line, upon exposure to HIV-1, forms syncytia (giant cells). It is well documented that the viral titer (amount) used is directly correlated with the number of syncytia formed. Therefore, evaluation of infectivity of HIV-1 can be used with this assay. In contrast, Experiment No. 2 used a differnet human T lymphoblastoid cell line named H9. This cell line, in contrast to CEM-SS cells, produces, upon exposure to HIV-1, many viral particles. The amount of virus produced is proportional to the amount of virus to which the cells are exposed. Therefore, quantitation of viral particles, or more commonly associated viral protein (in this case reverse transcriptase), can be used as an index of viral infection. In both assays, the CEM syncytia forming assay and the H9 viral protein assay, similar type results were obtained. That is, with the CEM cells, although syncytium formation and quantitation is preferrable, one can quantitate the HIV-1 associated protein (reverse transcriptase) activity and conversely with the H9 cells, although reverse transcriptase quantitation is preferred, one can quantitate giant cell (syncytia) formation. Both of these assays are widely used as reproducible measures of viral infection and can be used to determine if alterations in viral infectivity as a product of this electrical treatment can be detected.
Experiment #1
Approximately 100,000 CEM-SS cells per sample were incubated with a treated or untreated (control) viral aliquot for up to 4 days. The cells were placed into microtiter plate wells and monitored for formation of syncytia every 24 hours by microscopic observation. In a standardized fashion, as it has been reported in the literature and is currently being conducted in many laboratories, the number of syncytia at 3 and 4 days was determined. Table 2 summarizes the results from a representative experiment using this assay. As can be noted, the number of syncytia formed was inversely proportional to the amount of electric current. That is, additionally, with increased current (100 vs 50 uA) there was a reduction in the number of syncytia formed. These results and those of additional experiments using the CEM-SS cell line indicate a consistent finding that electrical treatment of the RF strain of HIV-1 attentuates the virus potential for inducing syncytium formation in this cell line.
Experiment #2
A separate and independent assay to determine the ability of electric current to alter HIV-1 infectivity using H9 cells was employed. The basic strategy was similar to that used for the CEM cells with the exception that the initial suspension of treated and controlled (non-treated) viral stock was incubated with 100,000 H9 cells for 2 hours at 37 degees Celsius. Thereafter, the cell virus suspensions were further diluted to 5 ml in standard tissue culture medium. The cell-viral suspensions were then incubated for up to 14 days at 37 degrees Celsius with 5% carbon dioxide. At 3 day intervals (beginning at day 2), aliquots of cell suspension were removed from each sample. The aliquots were centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes in order to pellet the cells. After centrifugation, the supernatant and cell pellets were seperated. The supernatant was cyropreserved for subsequent reverse transcriptase assay and the cell pellets were resuspended in fixatives and maintained in a tissue bank for additional studies employing in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry to detect qualitatively and semi-qualitatively viral infection by HIV-1. At the end of each experiment, the supernatant samples from each of the tests and time points were examined using standard reverse transcriptase assay. The results of the representative experiment are shown in Table 3. The results of this experiment indicate the ability of HIV-1 to infect H9 cells is attenuated by the magnitude of the electrical currents to which the virus is exposed. Additionally, at lower current magnitude, but with prolonged exposure time, attenuation of viral infectivity is achieved. That is, analogous to the results observed using syncytium formation and the CEM-SS cell line, either increased current or increased duration of exposure time was inversely proportional to the amount of reverse transcriptase produced by the cell line.
In conclusion, these experiments which have been repeated several times, and those using the CEM-SS cell line, indicate at a statistically significant level that direct electrical current at biocompatible amperages for discrete exposure time intervals can attenuate the ability of HIV-1 to infect normally healthy cells which are susceptible to the HIV-1 AIDS virus.
TABLE 3
Reverse Transcriptase Activity
(count per million x .001)
-------------------------------------
Days of Incubation
------------------
uAmps/Time(min.) 2 days 4 days
---------------- ------- ------
0/6 0 13.8
0/12 0 11.7
50/3 0 9.1
50/6 0 9.1
50/12 0 4.8
100/3 0 5.7
100/6 0 3.6
------------------------------------
Dr Robert Beck implemented the above using wrist or arterial electrodes put on the surface of the skin over major blood arteries and passing the current through the skin.You can find more information by typing blood electrification on your web browser.
i hope to hear a response from you soon
yours sincerely ,
dr callum
Thank you for posting your message. You are right that the pharmaceutical companies do not want cures publicized. I don't have AIDS or any disease, I am only concerned about the suppression of cures and the people afflicted by the coverup. There was a discovery in 1995 that people in Mediterranean countries have been using for centuries. Whenever someone would get sick, they would pick an olive leaf off a tree and chew it. The discovery was brought to this country and studied by a doctor who wrote a book on it ( I forget the name of the book,. I gave it to an AIDS counselor). The OLIVE LEAF EXTRACT cost about 80 cents a day at the health food store and the book costs $6.95. OLIVE LEAF EXTRACT kills VIRUSES (137 diseases last count) including AIDS and ANTHRAX by strengthening the immune sytem with no side effects. Sadly, I think that it is not only the pharmaceutical companies that are responsible for the suppression of cures, but society's own disbelief in NEW cures (people like to depend only on conventional medicine). Kind of like a "SOCIETAL COMFORT", people don't react very well to new informatin, it upsets the status quo. Anyway, the news of the OLIVE LEAF EXTRACT hasn't travelled very far since it's discovery. Doctors have used it. In using it, you must be aware of the "DIE OFF EFFECT", there will be a lot of dead bacteria left in your body after use and they must be flushed out by drinking EXTRA water (feeling sick until they are flushed 3-5 days is normal).
P.S. STAY AWAY from Aspartame (diet soda poison) read about it on this website, people have walked away from their wheelchair within 32 hours of discontinuing it's use.contains same chemical as bee stings if allowed to get warm.
My brother has been battling adinocarcinoma (colorectal cancer) for two years now. Two colonoscopy's (the first one misdiagnosed him with Chrone's disease), another emergency room visit a year later and a second colonoscopy finds malignant cancer stage III, doctor suggest surgery and 12 inches of his colon was removed and almost near death experience by post operative infection (the worst the ICU nurse had ever seen!!), a year of chemo therapy and then blood tests cat scans and third colonoscopy finds nothing, but two months later he goes into emergency room for pain and they find three small tumors and one large one, cancer matastisized and now stage IV.
No surgery suggested just chemo to keep him alive for maybe a few more months. Doctor told him, "you will die-there is no cure."
I am interested in finding him a cure. I believe there is one out there. I have never trusted the medical comunity when dealing with infectious diseases.
If anyone has any personal expereince or knows anyone who has had success with alternative treatments (such as Dr. Clarke's "Cure for All Cancer," the Flax seed Oil and/or Vitamin C and L-lysine treatments, ETC.).
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE respond if you know anything or anyone!!!
http://www.garynull.com , http://www.alternativemedicine.com and get Dr. Clark's soon to be coming out updated "Cure for HIV and Aids" book. Wish you luck.
fetched in 1.14 sec
at 5/21/2013 6:09:30 AM, requested by 23.22.76.170, referred by http://curezone.com/forums/am.asp?i=67151 , requested 1 pages in this session, y=1
Images Description Subscribe / Unsubscribe Link Books Rules
Home
Issue 9: A doctor diagnosed me as having AIDS 
