The powers that be have been trying for years to ban colloidal silver
and remove it from the marketplace. Why? Because it's the perfect
natural antibiotic, and it makes virtually all drug-company
manufactured antibiotics obsolete. (Shhh! It's an underground health
secret. Don't tell anybody...)
Bacteria have no resistance to colloidal silver like they do with
standard antibiotics, and colloidal silver is dirt cheap and
incredibly safe compared to drugs (I've been saved from viral
infections more than once by drinking an entire 2 oz. bottle of
colloidal silver).
Now, the EPA has found a clever way to potentially regulate colloidal
silver out of the market: they've announced they will classify the
substance as a "nanotechnology pesticide" and force colloidal silver
companies to prove it's safe if they want to keep selling it.
But where is the EPA's scrutiny of all other nanotech particles in
foods, skin care products and drugs? Nowhere to be found, of course.
The EPA seems to be exclusively targeting colloidal silver as the only
nanotech threat to U.S. consumers, and if they pull off this stunt,
they will have finally achieved the government's longstanding goal of
eliminating the competition to lucrative antibiotic drugs.
(The government protects corporations, not the public, didn't you
know?)
NewsTarget's exclusive feature story on colloidal silver is based on
interviews with one of the top health freedom attorneys in the country
-- a man who helped defend companies against the FDA's attempts to
outlaw the substance a few years ago.
Hi, I am new to this forum and doing some reading of discussion. I have been a supporter, consumer and producer of Colloidal Silver (for personal use) for over a decade. I just have one comment on this topic; in the form of a question... how does the EPA decide on a "safe" level, when they list no toxicity level?
Home
