my, you've been a busy little beaver. the government could use you to help keep people brainwashed. and by the way, cancer is a normal cell that exists in everyone, we all have 2% cancer. it is when it rises above that, that it is harmful. so, yes, cancer IS natural, like you said.
I am not requesting scientific validation that mercury Amalgams are safe. So good for you to find all that stuff. And if you think the FDA and WHO is your friend and really cares...you must be joking.
My body prefers a more natural state without mercury toxins and I don't need Science to tell me otherwise.
Funny how some people have to learn things, that others already seem to know, without a need for schooling.
We've all got different strengths and weaknesses.
you have a very generous heart, and the dedication of your time here shows it.
The day I won the most was april 27, 2005 , which was the day I had my last Amalgam filling removed. That very evening, I noticed the letters on the pages I was reading were no longer vibrating, which I hadn't noticed, owing to the insidious onset of the condition. This was undoubtedly due to removal of the electrogalvanism stemming from the diferent metallic compositions used in my over the years previous.
My draftsman, then aged 68, had tremor, and I asked him if he ever worked with mercury. He said "yes", but that was years ago and I cannot recall what his contact with the stuff was exactly, but it was in WWII and it was a source of significant exposure. I sent him some chlorella, and six weeks later he phoned me, and expressed surprise that he was improving.
how many forums did you go into at that time and ask to produce studies saying mercury fillings were harmful before you were convinced to get them out? if it is too many to list, you don't have to answer.
None. I was my own group. I'm one of those people who doesn't need to read books to understand that having mercury in the mouth is dangerous. I was an industrial chemist for a while before switching to law, and had been exposed to lots of mercury. I always knew it bad, but the event that kicked me off was
having to wear eyeglasses, when all the 90 year olds in my family on both sides do not need eyeglasses.
Plus, I found myself crying one day in my office, for no apparent reason. I had changed my diet to really eating healthy, which included lots of fish, but I was unaware of the methylmercury issue and I was eating a LOT of fish. Swordfish and tuna, 4 times a week or more for a long time. It probably kicked me over the threshold, from being symptom-free, to having symptoms. Everybody has a different threshold probably.
wow, yeah, it's sad the stuff people have to go through with mercury exposure when the allowable mercury level for humans is zero. but, if you listen to the government and ADA, they will tell us there is a tolerable level we can have (the "SMALL" level they admit comes off the fillings), and i guess that is supposed to make us feel ok about it
There is no such thing as an industrial chemist. Where did you graduate college in chemistry? Where did you go to law school? If you're against book learning ,why did you spend four years studying chemistry and three years in law school. The likely answer is that you did'nt.
You claim to be a chemist and a lawyer. You're not.
Speaking of which, Gilbert Jackson is both. He also studied hg content in old fillings and you can read the results at ibiblio.org/amalgam. Unfortunately,you wont be able to understand his work.
Images Description Dental Problems Homepage Amalgam Replacement Protocol Rules
Home
