In a world where humans with brown eyes dominate numerically, to constitute over 90% of the world's population, why is it that those who have answered Curezone's Iodine Survey are 75% or more of people whose eyes are NOT brown ?
"Eye Color: A Key to Human and Animal Behavior" - Dr. Morgan Worthy
ISBN 1-58348-568-6
Statistically then, the masses are predominantly of the reactionary type, and the minority who controls them are likely to be the self-paced, calculating type. The CZ survey results regarding the eye color question is fascinating to me.
eyes appeaer blue, when their pigments either 1) reflect only blue, absorbing all other colors; or 2) reflect all colors except the complementary color of blue, which is orange, i.e., only absorbe orange light.
It could be that some people's ability to absorb certain light frequencies from the surroundings into their eyes, that others with differently-colored eyes cannot absorb, has an impact on behavior. It could be that the absorption of orange light by the eyes of blue-eyed people has an effect on them.
In cyberspace eye color is not revealed. Perhaps those with recessive gene [non-brown] colored eyes [in the minority] feel more extroverted in this dimension. Those with brown eyes, it is not such a big deal since they dominate the normal day to day so-called outside world.
Eye color was investigated in association with the intensity of attacks in the fish Nile tilapia.
"We investigated the association of eye color with the dominant-subordinate relationship in the fish Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Eye color pattern was also examined in relation to the intensity of attacks. We paired 20 size-matched fish (intruder: 73.69 ± 11.49 g; resident: 75.42 ± 8.83 g) and evaluated eye color and fights."
or could it be that we blue-eyed devils are descendants of those who came to the new world seeking freedom(religious & otherwise)...?
and that in northern Europe(from whence our peeps came) a striving for survival was a necessity(ain't no coconuts falling from the trees there...)?
That striving and searching is part of our legacy?
The orange thing sounds good as well. I love oranges:) I like light, too.
I like the theory that the way people behave is controlled, in part at least, by the frequencies of light that are absorbed by their eyes and transmitted to the brain. I believe there is ample evidence taht we are beings of light and it controlling our behaviour should be no real stretch.
In Iridology, the belief is to keep the eye light and not let it become dark with toxins. It is said that the eyes are the window to the soul. (refreshed 48124)
Food for thought there, V....So, humans, Huskies, some kittys & CROWS! Did you know that crows have blue eyes? Baby crows do anyway:)
So are blue-eyed people able to absorb more frequencies of light? Or just different ones?
I don't know for sure, but I think just different ones. They would reflect all but orange or reflect only blue and absorbed the rest. Different shades of brown will absorb a different range of frequencies. I wonder if blue eyed people would behave differently in a room with orange walls, than would brown eyed people. Mybe some psych student has done work on this.
Being a teenager in the 70's, my parent's home was filled with tendy color orange everywhere. It drove me crazy...or was that just teenage angst? :@ (refreshed 48124)
i have heard that infants have blue eyes and that they change color in the first 6 months if they are going to. if this is true, then blue eyes would not only be a recessive trait, it would fall under the heading of neoteny. evolutionists believe that neoteny is the trend in human evolution.
"... it does seem likely that normal development is controlled by gradually decreasing concentration of a hormone acting primarily at high levels of the regulatory system. This is also an ideal mechansim for the simple and rapid production of heterochronic effects. Any acceleration of adult characters by reduction in the titer of juvenile hormone, or extension of juvenile traits by maintenance of a high titer, represents heterochrony. Since minor alterations in the concentration of a hormone can lead to substantial changes in morphology, heterochrony may play an important role in geographic variation (secretion of juvenile hormone is influened by temperature and photoperiod, for example), polymorphism (including sex, caste, and phase) and speciation itself." (Gould, S.J. (1977) Ontegeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Belknap Press. p. 295-6)
"The evolution of modern Homo sapiens over the past 100,000 years has been marked by a trend toward increasingly craniofacial neoteny, including reduced prognathism, increased brachycephaly, and general gracilization in a number of populations. (Weidenreich 1945, Newman 1962, Brace and Mahler 1971, Frayer 1981). Biological anthropologists have generally invoked natural selection for ecological adaptation of nonadaptive forces such as pleiotropy or biased mutation to explain these trends. The analysis in this paper suggests that sexual selection may also be involved." (Jones, Doug (1995) Sexual selection, physical attractiveness, and facial neoteny: cross-cultural evidence and implications. Current Anthropology 36 (5): pp. 735)