I agree - you really learn something about people in a thread like this. I honestly thought that everone who usually posts here would jump in and express opinions against this crapola. Boy, was I wrong (with a few notable exceptions). It is shocking!
It truly is, I thought I was going to sit back and passively read the opposition to #79513 flood in. Both from reasonable people who oppose such demeaning blanket characterization of women and from Christians who would oppose his perverted interpretations of the Bible. Heck what about those just standing up for Jesus.
I can't believe that I, whom people have called, satan, antichrist and atheist (never admitted to any of those) is left defending both Christianity and Women.
It is nice to see some reasoned voices among the din of hate and irrationality
Yes! :) Hello to "satan, antichrist and atheist" from "liberal Muslim-lover", lol! Oh, and my new handle, "whoring Jezebel". I too thought I would be just sitting back and watching the volley. But something this inane could not go unaddressed.
I agree - it is good to see some reason amidst the insanity, and thank you for that.
In point of fact, Jesus is a greater liar than Jesus. As far as I know, Satan never wrote a book - then forcibly forced it down the throats of folks. Satan didn't shove a Covenent down people's throats and then lie about it afterwards. Frankly, if Satan is so evil, he needs a dose of Viagra, because he doesn't compare to the sins of Jesus.
Muslims? Aren't those the guys who would rather carry out honor killings than endure child support slavery? The last time I checked, the Great Whore makes an exception for them. Do you also want to put Muslims on child support, I have I simply caught you in hypocracy?
Jesus never wrote a book. As far as we can tell we have nothing that is directly the work of Jesus. The story of Jesus come to us through the work of his followers. And since Jesus never wrote a book, he never forced the book he did not write upon anyone, nor did he lie about a book that never existed.
Here is a hint for the future; when writing "In point of fact", it helps if actually happens to be a fact. Saying its a fact won't make it so.
Your ignorance of Islam is specially acute. The incidents you mention are real, yet they are not representative of Muslims as a whole. No more than the actions of one woman are representative of all women. You are prone and quick to generalize and cast a whole group for the sins of one or a few - it is wrong, irrational and immoral.
From your continual advocacy of violence against women, I am confident in declaring you a pathetic loser who must use violence to feel superior to women. It is only in strength and violence in which you can match women, so that is what you use to feed your small, flaccid ego.
Geesh Corinthian I know you are better then this. I am really expecting some wisdom to explode from you! Look at the reality of life and stop being so subjective! I swear Corrie stop being so adversarial. I know you are above this ! Stop taking sides!
Not really, since my mentioning of Muslinms had nothing whatsoever to do with child support. I was simply pointing out that many people who post here get inflamed over one group or another. Change the name and the face, but it all remians the same - prejudicial generalizations.
On the other hand, you stated Muslim, like the Muslim way was somehow better. The Muslim way is far more strict on women than Christianity. I think much of the talk against the muslim faith is based on the fact that they are not subject to the Great Whore, and that there is considerable anxiety that American men must live in slavery, whereas muslim men can do as they wish. Actually, I'm kind of jealous of them.
Well, then please by all means feel free to relocate.
How is calling myself "liberal Muslim lover" saying I think their way is better? My point was simply that muslims are one of many groups that tend to get bashed around here.
However, the fact that you leapt onto that one word in my post tells me you have some issues with them. . . and I am not surprised.
It is much more desirable to control the cattle than have the cattle control you (I'm addressing the men here). Women have proven to be dumber than cattle when it comes raising familes.
The simple fact is that men just need to make up their minds that they simply won't be controlled. It's not as if women are simply going to physically force us to obey them. All we have to do is simply say no. And what a lesson it will be to the children that men are willing to sacrifice themselves in order for their sons to live in Freedom.
While I personally not benefit from the return to male dominance, I will do my utmost to not bow to the Great Whore. The Great Whore relies on the men being scared and afraid. If you are a man, I tell you the truth, I have looked into the eyes of the Great Whore, and I have seen fear. And the Great Whore ought to be afraid. Her demise is certainty. Gravity will do it all in the end. Women are too stupid and incompetent when given even a modicum of power. Each and every day that stupidity and incompetance become more evident to ever-increasing numbers of men. The is why don't even pretend to regard the opinion of women. Because in the end, the power and authority will once again reside with Man and Man alone.
I will never give a woman politician the time of day. They are worthy of nothing more than being shunned. They are certainly unworthy of any allegiance or devotion.
Deliberately and malisciously denying man the liberty to pass on his essence to children raised in the manner he thinks fit, a right given through the blood of patriots who fought and died for this country, can only described with one word - Treason. In the United States, there's an itty-bitty little amendment in the Bill of Right, and even the preachers of the Lying Jesus talk about that little itty-bitty amendment - Freedom of Religion. Any official who has knowingly and deliberately forced the removal of the Constitutional Right of Freedom of Worship is guilty of treason.
Every child a man denied potentially having, because of child support slavery, can only be thought to be the equivalent to murder. It's the same loss as if the Great Whore actually pulling the trigger.
I have proven that Jesus is both a liar and a sinner. I have seen no credible evidence to the contrary. Whether you respect that or not is irrelevant. I do not hold in high regard the opinions of women in either politics or faith. Never have, never will!
Well, at least we have a mutual disrespect for one-another, lol!
It is not your ideas about Jesus that I disrespect - it is your attitude towards women. You idea about Jesus sinning - well, it isn't even worth arguing, which is why everyone is focused on the "woman" issue instead.
Ultimate respect for women is allowing them to live in a way most conducive to family life. That life, the kind of family life that has been around most of the last million years, is the greatest kind of respect a man can give a woman. Men and women are not the same. Men were meant to make the final decisions. Women are happiest when men make those decisions. Grasping at the few defective men out there as examples to label all men by is highly unfair. The best kind of family structure where the children grow up healthiest and happiest is when the man is in charge. The better man is one who listens to his loved ones. I know I certainly listen to what my loved ones have to say. If I spend all my time talking instead of listening to them, I really don't know what's going on with them. I'd like to think that most of the time I don't have to invoke a final say in discussion. My personal style is that I like lots of input from those around me. Certainly I don't mind controversy, but with my family, final says are mine.
Well, you sound a bit softer - I appreciate that. And I am glad you do take other family members' views into consideration, because whether you realize it or not, you come off as a major tyrant.
Men and women are not the same - true. And thus each can bring their own perspectives into a decision-making situation.
Men were meant to make the final decision - debatable. There are many well-run countries being run by females.
Women are happiest when men make the final decisions - how do you know that women are "happy" about that? Your own fiance may be, but that does not mean all women agree with that.
In my house, if my husband and I do not agree on something, we discuss it. Often we compromise. Sometimes, I will come to realize that his view are the better way, and we should go with them. Other times, he will come to realize that my views are the better way, and we should go with them. SOmetimes we take the best of his and the best of mine and go with that. Works marvelously. I guess my question is, if your fiance has a different view than you do, is there ever a time where you re-think it and go with hers? You can then say that your "final say" was to go with her idea, if you really need to be the ultimate authority.