Re: Where did the new 273 proteins come from?

You have to be joking. That link is a big joke.
All it does is refute everything in just words.
It neither cites any research papers or shows any photographs(of the actual HIV virus).
It very authoritatively refutes each and every argument put forward by the "hiv does not cause aids" theory.

And please dont give me that "do you really think that no one would have found out".
My dear friend scientists have found out. Yes scientist not some Conspiracy theorist on the internet.
The scientist have found out that there is no HIV. One of the research I remember is that they take the blood(of alleged HIV infected patient) and bombard it will chemicals and then what remains as a result is considered as HIV+ or negative.
Still there is not test that isolates the virus.
Here are the scientists who have found that something is not right!!!!!!!!

Peter Duesberg was the recipient of numerous grants and awards, including a Nobel Prize nomination for his discovery of oncogenes. Since being labeled an AIDS dissident, Duesberg has lost his funding, his research lab and his reputation in the scientific community. Duesberg's current work on an innovative theory of cancer has gained notoriety and inspired talk of a second Nobel Prize nomination.

Kary Mullis won the Nobel Prize in chemistry for his invention of PCR, a revolutionary DNA amplification process. PCR is the cornerstone of the HIV Viral Load theory despite Mullis' assertions that PCR cannot detect or diagnose viral infection. Mullis is Vice President and Director of Molecular Biology at Burstein Technologies, a world renowned scientific consultant and a popular lecturer.

My friend showed me a cutout of a newspaper of a small town in Mangalore, India. It has a "ask a doctor" column. I was shocked to hear the reply of the doctor.
A person had tested hiv+ and he was asking the doctor if he should take AZT. He was saying that the hospital that tested him were literally forcing him to take AZT(retroviral) The way they were forcin him he found something fishy and was scared.
The answer given by the doctor There is no need to take the AZT as "They have a reason to believe that AZT might be the cause of AIDS or may cause similiar symptoms of AIDS that may result in the death of the patient just like, if he would die out of AIDS".
Can you believe that. Some people are given AZT on the basis of a ELISA and Western BLOT test.
Both these test kits come with a warning "these kits do not detect HIV".
I have seen that my self and my friend took an HIV test to see what was the count.
It just shows antibody count. Both these test just show the anti-body count.
Now do I have to go and explain to you that antibodies are produced by the body in response to any germs entering out body. There is not evidence that no other germ(apart from HIV) produced a similiar antibody count.
I dont know if HIV exist or no but I am sure that many people are being pushed down the road of death and being "declared" as HIV+ when the test conducted niether detect HIV nor are they conclusive.
That is the reason that India and africa have high HIV rates. It is not because of unprotected sex. It is because of the unhygenic conditions they live in. That means they will be having a lot of germs in their body through the contaminated food and water they consume. That means they are bodies will always be producing high anti-bodies.
That means when they go for a HIV test they will come out positive.
I think that is what we should not allow to happen.
Then they are forced to take AZT(retro virus drugs) that are so toxic that it kills them in the end.
ANd we all think they died of AIDS>

Alert Webmaster & Moderators

0 of 1 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?
How do you feel about this message?     Agree     Disagree       Hide this question