|
- Chemists from 1929 says there's Iodine in Walnut 2
/43
1
by #69242
5 year
1,929
Ask Barefoot
- Re: Chemists from 1929 says there's Iodine in Walnut2
by mh
5 year
2,218
- Re: Chemists from 1929 says there's Iodine in Walnut3
by UserX
5 year
1,928
- Re: Chemists from 1929 says there's Iodine in Walnut4
by mh
5 year
1,920
- Re: Chemists from 1929 says there's Iodine in Walnut5
by CandidaInContext
5 year
1,786
- Re: Chemists from 1929 says there's Iodine in Walnut6
by UserX
5 year
1,851
- Re: Chemists from 1929 says there's Iodine in Walnut7
by mh
5 year
1,872
- Re:8
by UserX
5 year
1,751
- 9
by #69242
5 year
1,664
- Re: 10
by UserX
5 year
1,717
"That was my point in posting iodine number which he assumes I know nothing about."
If you in fact had had such a point, you would not need to explain it at this juncture.
Regarging:
"As you know, herbs elicit responses from the body and allow the body to metabolize and turn compositions into needed nutrients."
If the person you are writing to already knows this, then why are you wasting time telling them it ? It adds nothing.
Regarding:
"All oils have traces of elemental iodine."
I have a bottle of distilled coconut oil, which contains absolutely no trace of iodine. You're wrong again.
You've called me an "arrogant antagonizer" and a "liar". Name calling is a tactic typically what people whose arguments have no merit must resort to when they are desperate.
Regarding:
"But more importantly, what is the body's need for iodine after supplementing with natural forms?"
The statement is indefinite. It states "...more importantly..", but does not make reference to what it's more important relative to.
The more you write, in response to a truthful assertion by V, attempting to inject emotion, the worse your position becomes.
I think statements such as these can give alternate medical community a bad reputation in the eyes of some. There is no such thing as "iodine potential". It's the presence of unsaturation, which can also react with oxygen, bromine, cyanogen and hundreds of other things. It could as easily be called "oxygen potential" or "bromine potential", but nobody uses such terms, other than you, because it does not make sense to do so.


|
Alert Webmaster & Moderators
|
|
Reply to This Message  | Attributes associated with this message:
UserX will be notified if you reply to this message! | | Use of CureZone is subject to the following Terms of Service |
|
Important Disclaimer! Answers, comments and opinions provided on CureZone are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. CureZone does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in messages, comments or articles on CureZone. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. Read more ... |
| |
- n/m12
by #35289
5 year
1,649
- Re: Chemists from 1929 says there's Iodine in Walnut13
by DameonDemon
5 year
1,766
- 14
by #69242
5 year
1,717
- 17
by #69242
5 year
1,758
- To Vulcanel26
by plzchuckle
5 year
1,860
1
|
|