Re: HCL the better activator ? Standard MMS protocol actually a combination of CLO2 + unactivated NaCLO2 with 2 different effects ?

Could it be that there is more benefit to the original MMS protocol as one would think after all the critics ?

So if only a tiny amount of CLO2 may be reaching the blood, would it not be advisable to stick with the fairly high original MMS dosing.

Could it be that there is a good reason for using excessive acid and exactly 3 minutes of activation time ? After 3 minutes with potentially half of NaCLO2 not activated and diluted with water, you may have just the right amount of acid in that solution to continue rapid activation in the stomach. The first large dose of free CLO2 could oxidize the way free for the post-ingestion produced ClO2 which could then go to the bloodstream in higher proportions. Just a little theory.

I still tend to prefer HCL, but should my theory be somewhat right then HCL could be too efficient as an activator in order to get the same solution as in Jim Humble's way. To achieve a similar effect one would have to activate one part, dilute with water, then add more NaClO3 drops and more acid to the solution - a bit more complicated.

There seems to be no complete research or understanding of how MMS or stabilized oxygen ingestions mechanically work. All we know is that it definitely works well.
Also known is that the MMS protocol has raised far more attention than any predecessors in the last 40 years and
that could be because it is just simply the more ideal way to apply CLO2 compared to other protocols and has produced more and better results for people.

Alert Webmaster & Moderators