Re: Oxygen therapy / Myths and Facts/Final Article

The original poster does not really understand hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). HBOT is not totally reliant on hemoglobin transport. If that were the case then how would it treat carbon monoxide poisoning? The principle of HBOT falls under various physics laws. In short though the principle is that the amount of gas forced in to SOLUTION is directly proportional to the amount of pressure applied. The gas being oxygen in this case. So as the pressure is increased the amount of oxygen forced in to the fluids of the tissues increases. I learned this over 30 years ago when I took up scuba diving. It is not something newly discovered.

The original poster also left out many other important factors such as oxygen toxicity. Or vasoconstriction by HBOT, which DECREASES the blood from getting to areas of the body. Or the fact that HBOT has been shown to increase VEGF and angiogenesis. Why is this important? Maybe because cancer cells use VEGF and other stimulators for angiogenesis to tap in to major blood vessels so they can feed?!!!

I know how he likes to argue about things he does not have clue about so here, he can look it up himself:

http://www.worldwidewounds.com/2001/april/Wright/HyperbaricOxygen.html


And anyone that has read my posts knows I am not against oxygen therapies as he is trying to imply. In fact I aggressively promote the PROPER oxygen therapies to go with the correct conditions. HBOT has its place. But not for cancer. Ozone will work for cancer among other things. And it can help with congestive heart failure as where HBOT is contradicted. And peroxide therapy has its place. In fact I have also written on these boards about how to use peroxide to blast apart cancer cells. So again, I am not against oxygen therapies. Only those that have not been proven to work but have dangerous side effects such as cesium therapy.

And then he sits here and whines about being banned from my forum without telling the full story. We can see right here in this thread how he lies and misleads. And did he happen to mention the threat he sent to me that I posted for him to see again before banning him? And did he mention how he was over there trying to be disruptive? Of course not. The little whiny brat is looking for a little sympathy, and he cannot get it if he told the truth about what really happened. I have only banned one person from my forum and the moderator banned one when the forum was set up, even though there are other people posting stuff on there I disagree with. The reason both of these people were banned is they were not there to share, but rather to disrupt. And I don't take kindly to being threatened by nut cases!!!

Alert Webmaster & Moderators

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?
How do you feel about this message?     Agree     Disagree       Hide this question