|
>-
success rate is much higher—closer to 60 percent, and in some cases as high as
75 percent.
Show me the studies. It is easy to put things in a book without much basis. I
will review an actual study to see for myself how well it was done and how valid
it is.
One
way to avoid facts is to discredit the source. Go to the link and ask
them.
>- That's a laugh and a rationalization. (i.e. regarding a high
number of illnesses caused by accidents or visits for other reasons)
Only on your part, I have confirmed this with an MD.
Well a "high number" is not the same as a high percentage and while
a large number may be diagnosed this way, you show me the percentages.
>- That is not the book I was referring to.
Actually, that was an error, the book is "Remarkable Recovery". I
had to leave in a hurry to run some errands and did not proofread.
It's still not the book I was referring to.
>- The reason the material is tested in minute detail is to determine
the type of cancer and the possible extent of it.
I am very well aware of this as I have experience of this as well as having
cultured cancer cells.
Ok, we agree then that ALL cancer is subjected to laboratory review
(different than an earlier post you made) and you still think that a monster
fluke is responsible for them? In spite of all the CT and PET scans going
on with cancer patients? Hogwash
>- You read a different book than I did because Hulda claimed that each
cancer has a internal fluke.
No, I read several of her books but did not remember that statement.
>- You're still lying.
Again, you are not correct. My statements are true as I showed before.
Let's flush all of your incorrect statements then and go to Faciolopsis
buskii which you claim you have never seen in her books. Go to
"Curing Cancer" on page 331 of her "Cure For All Diseases"
and carefully read the part that you skipped. Under "Another Fluke
Disease" on that page she says that "the responsible parasite is
Fasciolopsis buskii (i.e. liver fluke) the human intestinal fluke, a
flatworm." (Her highlights, not mine.) She then goes on to
describe how the eggs of these flukes not only go out through your feces but
also enter into your body and how these flukes then enter into ALL cancers (on
page 332).
That liver fluke has a very unique life cycle. The link below provides
a thorough explanation of this "cancer causing" fluke and I'll quote
various portions of it - you can go to the site (and a zillion others like it)
and read for yourself.
http://human-infections.suite101.com/article.cfm/fasciolopsis_buski_fluke
Fasciolopsis buski
Fasciolopsis buski is a parasite, a fluke that infects humans,
pigs, dogs and rabbits in southern Asia. It is often called the giant
intestinal fluke because it is one of the largest flukes to infect
people—adult worms can be 75mm (about three inches) long and 20mm (nearly an
inch) wide.
Though many of us are familiar with the term “liver fluke,” F.
buski does not live in the liver: these large leaf-shaped worms inhabit
the upper regions of the small intestine. When there are many worms, they are
also found in lower areas of the intestine and in the stomach. Fasciolopsis
buski is not found in other parts of the body. (emphasis added)
<snip>
An individual infected with F. buski passes thousands of
microscopic eggs in the stool—each adult worm produces 25,000 eggs every
day. Eggs passed or washed into a body of fresh water continue to develop.
After about seven weeks, tiny parasitic organisms called “miracidia”
emerge. To continue development, they require one of several species
of aquatic snail. (emphasis added) If the appropriate species is
present, the miracidia enter snails and reproduce. If the right
species of snail is absent, the miracidia die. (emphasis
added)
Parasites exit the snails as “cercariae,” another stage in the life
cycle of the giant intestinal fluke. Cercariae find water plants and
encyst on them, building little protective envelopes around themselves.
If the water plants with “metacercariae” are eaten raw by a suitable
species of animal (human, pig, dog, rabbit), the worms can mature to
adults in the intestine. In about three months, they will begin producing
eggs, starting the life cycle over again.
Ok, end of site quotes.
You will notice if you read the whole article that these flukes are found
only in S. E. Asia. You will also note that in order to complete its
life cycle it has to find a host snail of a particular variety.
You will also find that this snail is found only in S. E.. Asia and that as
part of the cycle a human (and many animals) have to eat raw vegetation that
have the "cercariae" on them. It is impossible for them to
complete a life cycle within the human body as Hulda claims in the book
section that I referred to. The eggs have to be passed from the body
before they can continue their life cycle.
Hulda's claim in that book is ludicrous and your saying you've read all
of her books shows you haven't paid attention to them.
>- You are still living in the medical Dark Ages.
No, I am not at all. I have in my closet an entire cancer history,
including MRI's, CAT scans, PET scans (for bone metastases), Blood tests, etc.
Not only do I have these, I know how to read them. I know what the blood test
mean.
Also, I diagnosed my own cancer, even as to type, before I went to the doctor
for confirmation. I ended up having to treat myself because they failed. So
far with the blessings of my creator, I am still here.
Well, you are providing the source of you cure that I completely agree with
and good for you. But Hulda's hocus pocus had nothing to do with
it. The book that I was referring to earlier had more than 200
documented cancer cures including pancreatic cancer, with no medical
intervention and the common thread was a positive outlook. Additionally,
the placebo effect (which is actually "caused" by the human spirit)
has been documented to cure cancer and whether you attribute it to god (which
I do - even if they are non-believers) or something else shows the power of
human ability to deal with all disease without doctors.
>- Again, nary a fluke related to cancer has ever been found in North
America and you concept of knee jerk diagnosis is really really sad, totally
ill-informed, and way out of date.
Again, you are mistaken and do not know what you are talking about. Just
because you don't know about it, does not mean that it does not exist. There
are cases in the US where the liver fluke has been found in cancer patients,
but again they are rarely reported or published.
What you fail to understand is that everyone who gets cancer, dies. Everyone
who does not get cancer dies. Those who go through traditional oncological
treatment die much sooner. Most oncologist would not take chemo or radiation
for most cancers.
Oncology ranks cancers with a 5 year survival rate. The reason for this is
that at about 7 years, you have a better chance of survival if you do not
follow traditional chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery.
Hulda says that the liver fluke is in ALL cancer. That a fluke is
found in a person with cancer in those very rare instances where you say they
have been found (please document) is no different than the number of flukes in
the population at large - but not Fasciolopsis buski. My prostate cancer
was diagnosed about 18 years ago and I refused medical intervention. I
will not die from cancer and I don't have parasites.
What you and the traditioanal medical establishment fail to realize is
the how and why of cancer growth being enabled by flukes and other parasites.
That's another of your utterly ludicrous statements with nothing but Hulda
to back it up. With all the lab tests of every cancer, with CT scans and
PET scans you think that that modern medicine is missing something?
Neither a fluke nor any other parasite has ever been found in me or the cancer
tissue that has been removed from me including lung cancer. It is
impossible for these items you swear by to have been missed with all the
testing that is done today.
Hulda was one giant hoax.
|
Alert Webmaster & Moderators
 
|
| 
Images Description The Cure For All Diseases by Hulda Regehr Clark Rules
Home
by quincyjonesfan1
4 year
5,182
0 of 4 (0%)
Dr. Clark Debate
/ Quackery D
/ Questionin
