|
Denialism: Is scientific advancement really that bad? /55
1
by KeepTrying11
3 year
1,165
0 of 1 (0%)
Vaccination Debate
- Re: Scientific advancement has two edges it can cut you either way.2
by bewnyfur
3 year
1,061
2 of 2 (100%)
- Re:
/55
21
by Freedom Citizen
3 year
980
- Re: Denialism: Is scientific advancement really that bad?22
by #69242
3 year
1,010
- Re: Denialism: Is scientific advancement really that bad?28
by rifestudy123
3 year
1,032
- Re: Denialism: Is scientific advancement really that bad?29
by KeepTrying11
3 year
1,036
0 of 2 (0%)
- Re: Denialism: Is scientific advancement really that bad?30
by rifestudy123
3 year
1,036
1 of 1 (100%)
- Re: Denialism: Is scientific advancement really that bad? 31
by rifestudy123
3 year
1,039
1 of 1 (100%)
I'm replying to the last three parts of your message here, starting with the last one:
The last thing i would do is go to a doctor if i had cancer. Whats their cure rate these days, a whooping 17%? Thats a joke. My dad got cancer last year, Cured it with the Bob Beck pulser and good nutrition. Plus you can cure cancer with Frequency’s, Ozone, and herbs and nutrition. I told him to go with the pulser simply because it cost the least.
Kids getting vaccines:
I've seen healthy babies start getting sick all the time and get a couple seizers after getting vaccinated. As I said before as we create more and more vaccines Autism, Allergies, Asthma, childhood cancers, diabetes, ADD and ADHA are all on the raise.
“You are basically saying that if you put a person in a room with one of these deadly diseases, that just because they are "clean" and "healthy" that they will not contract the disease. Sorry, but the human body is not able to fight off every disease that is thrown at it, no matter how clean or healthy the person is. “
Happens all the time. I’ve been in homes where someone is sneezing with the flu and getting it all over the place. Days later 1 or 2 more people get it but a couple others don’t get it. Everyone breathe the same air just some people immune systems were a bit stronger at the time. And the flu does kill people so it is a deadly disease ( who mainly dies from it? The ones with the weakest immune systems, generally the elderly).
“And plus our medical treatment is more advanced and available than one of those people who live in a Third World country.”
True our medical treatment is more advanced here but the fact is we never get most the things these people in third world countries get because were better nourished and have more sanitary conditions. Plus, look at Africa. These people are dying of more disease since the WHO went there and started vaccinating them.


|
Alert Webmaster & Moderators
|
|
1 of 1 (100%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
How do you feel about this message?
Agree
Disagree
Hide this question
|
Reply to This Message  | Attributes associated with this message:
rifestudy123 will be notified if you reply to this message! You can PM rifestudy123 email rifestudy123 | | Use of CureZone is subject to the following Terms of Service |
|
|
Important Disclaimer! Answers, comments and opinions provided on CureZone are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. CureZone does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in messages, comments or articles on CureZone. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. Read more ... |
| |
- Re: Denialism: Is scientific advancement really that bad?32
by bewnyfur
3 year
948
|
|