Re: cellfood from oxywave and DE36,instead of DE

I may be able to shed some light on the subject. I used to work for the manufacturer of Cellfood in an executive position. Cellfood is not made by Lumina Corporation, or OxyWave it's made by NuScience Corporation, who manufactures Cellfood in it's facility in Lancaster, CA.

The dispute between CellPower and Cellfood has gone on for some time. Each has a "claim" of this or that in regards to the original formulation. In the book "Beyond Belief" written by Everette Storey, he refers to the original "Lee Reynolds" formulation that came before Cellfood, and Everette took the formulation "completed" it, and created the current formulation of Cellfood.

There are a couple issues that I see being brought up in this thread however that I think that good reasonable people need to look at.

Let me say first of all, that I no longer work for the company and quite frankly have absolutely no desire to defend NuScience, Kevin Negrete (President) Jon Rhoten, Kim Rhoten or anybody else at NuScience. They know who I am and even though I no longer work for the company, I have personal experience with Cellfood since 1997 and believe in the product line... I usually do not post in these forums and have been virtually silent when I see posts about what people think about Cellfood. (Plus there are non disclosures and legal issues if I say too much... lol)

So, with that little disclaimer that basically says why you should listen to me, it's because I know what I am talking about from the insider of Cellfood perspective. So what issues/questions do I see being raised here?

Q)Is Cellfood safe? Will I put myself at risk by taking it and somehow "glow" at night?

A)Safety is always the issue...The scare tactics (from both sides) are ridiculous. One side says there is some sort of radioactive deadly ingredient,that their stuff is more powerful, and the other side says "how do you know the other stuff is safe? What testing has been done?" Here are some facts. There has never been a liability lawsuit brought against NuScience for any reason ever. In a society that sues if a cup of coffee gets spilled in your lap because it's too hot, I think there is some merit to the fact that there has never been a lawsuit. Not only that, there has never been a documented and substantiated adverse reaction filed. With a track record of being on the market for a LONG time (more than 25 years) that says something loud and clear to those who are at least willing to look at that fact. (Normal detox symptoms are not included in the adverse reaction category)

This brings me to the issue of third party product testing.

If I were King for a day in the CellPower camp and could advise them as to where I think there biggest weakness is, it would be this issue.

Where is the 3rd party testing that back up any claims of anything?

Sales crap from both sides is meaningless. There are a ton of websites out there that promote Cellfood and CellPower. Selling a product in a competitive marketplace comes down to who can "out-market" the competitor? It means "how do I differentiate my product from the others?"

In the Cellfood vs CellPower controversy I do have my hat off to the fact that NuScience has spent the money to do product testing, and there are 3rd party labs that have documented the efficacy of Cellfood to do some pretty extraordinary things.

It isn't about who is first, who "says" their product is the strongest, the best or tastes better. It's about results.

For instance, the surface tension testing... hmmm, is Cellfood a surfactant, basically breaking the surface tension of water, making it "wetter" ...uhhhh let me see, oh yea there it is, a 3rd party test that proves some pretty interesting facts...

Does Cellfood kill Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, (bad bacteria) uh, well let's see, oh yea...there is a test that PROVES that...hmmm

Is Cellfood toxic? Well let's look at the LD50 testing that shows that you can "overdose" rats with thousands of times the amount of Cellfood that would be normally taken and here is the results.. "All animals survived, gained weight and appeared active and healthy. There were no signs of gross toxicity, adverse pharmacological effects or abnormal behavior." No animals were hurt in the testing...lol...

Personally, having no vested interest in supporting NuScience on any level, I have to say that the clean track record, the product testing that NuScience has invested into is worthy of the eye of the most robust skeptic.

Lastly...

To just buy one product over another based upon testimonials alone, is not wise either. We are all very unique in our make-up we all respond to things differently. If your body doesn't need something, then how can we expect to "feel better" by taking something that we may or may not need?

The health supplement industry is full of manufacturers and distributors that make spurious claims with well written sales materials and willing consumers who do not do their homework. I appreciate the fact that this forum is made available to people like YOU who post here to attempt to get the truth...

Again... I hold no ill will against NuScience, or the makers of CellPower. I just think that CellPower would be better served if they actually spent the money and did some testing...

Hope this helps..

Alert Webmaster & Moderators Already alerted!  Already alerted!

1 readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?
How do you feel about this message?     Agree     Disagree       Hide this question