Throw those old textbooks away Hv... they are misleading you.
ROTFLMAO!!!! You clearly don't know half of what you think you know.
Stick with what you know Hv, not with what you do not.
Good advice, you should follow it Grz!!!
>>"You mean the same person who claims that sunlight is acidic?"<<
Look up the *electric sun*, or *ion storm* and potential hydrogen...
Look up the fact that sunlight is radiation, not hydrogen!!!
>>"Or that ammonia has isotopes?"<<
Become familiar with ammonia salts... among other things.
Ammonia salts are not isotopes. And here I thought you had some knowledge of science. I guess I was wrong about that.
>>"Or that muscles burn protein instead of glucose?"<<
You may need to brush up on glutamine as a glucose precursor, and its role in insulin response... among MANY other things.
You mean you did not know that proteins and amino acids are not the same thing? And why did you mention "glucose precursor" if the muscles are burning proteins? Better find and dust off those textbooks you discarded Grz because you clearly forgot a lot of BASIC science, anatomy and physiology!!!
>>"Or that there are subatomic minerals?"<<
Where in your link proves the claim? Why are you being so vague?
Knock yourself out... and again, stick with what you know... not with what you do not.
Again, advice you should follow. Here, let me help you out:
Now note that minerals are not subatomic particles and subatomic particles are not minerals.
>>"Or that claims that acidity in the body turns the body in to a puddle of goo?"<<
Refreshed gave you one example... I could give you others.
The example was bogus since it is not acids that cause the decay as I pointed out.
>>"And there were his funny bogus claims about "funny protein" such as this one:"<<
NPN... non-protein nitrogen - funny protein... ammonia salts among others... a very real and increasing threat in the food supply that sent 10's of thousands in china into kidney failure, and killing many children... documented the year of the Olympics and posted on these boards by me.
NPN also includes things like amino acids and polypeptides as I have explained to you in the past. Actually I have addressed this claim a number of times such as these:
The fact is that we need many NPNs to not only exist but to survive. So to simply claim that NPN is toxic or dangerous is as stupid as claiming that gas will kill us because carbon monoxide will while ignoring that we need oxygen to exist and survive!!!
>>"The same person who hid the adverse events people posted on his forum after following his advice?"<<
I do not know about that - that is somewhat of a false accusation in my opinion. I do remember that every single person who had issues of one sort or the other with the *protocol* were doing it incorrectly and were not changing their diets...
I addressed the "blame the victim" game as well:
one, I specifically remember, still went to fast food joints, ate junk food, drank sodas, etc. and *expected* the protocol to help cure her of her illnesses and make up for her very poor dietary and lifestyle choices... it does not work that way.
>>"My all time favorite though is how he went on and on over how nitrites, which should have been nitrates, produced toxicity by the production of methemoglobin."<<
Again, stick with what you know Hv. Not everything is as it seems, or as you *think* it is.
Grz, get a clue!!!! That was the same website that Moreless based his claim on. So why did he leave out that important fact?!!!
I used to have some respect for you because you seemed rational and seemed to base most of what you said on real science. Now it seems like you just parrot the same cult claims that the rest of the cult does with no regards for the facts. What a shame!!!
Alert Webmaster & Moderators|
Already alerted! Already alerted!