So-called Objectivity and Who is Protected

Here is a reply that I got from In Charge when I inquired about his military service:

"That's on a need to know basis. Besides I know you're just acting still trying to get in my pants. It aint going to happen, I have pride. LOL"

Here is my reply to In Charge:

"Okay, IC, you're right. I just want to get into your pants! And when I get my hands on you, I'm going to tear your pants off and spank the shit out of you! I can't wait."

Moderator, you edited this exchange in order to hide the bulk of IC's reply to me! You deleted the very important part where he said "Besides I know you're just acting still trying to get in my pants. It aint going to happen, I have pride. LOL" SO now it reads as if IC just replied, "That's on a need to know basis."

So, IC is allowed to insinuate that I am trying to "get into his pants" and when I reply, in a sarcastic manner, you delete my reply?! And you edit what he originally said?

What kind of moderating is this?! You are obviously trying to protect someone who implies sexua| motives towards women, and laughs about it. And if anyone replies to him, YOU delete it. I am copying and saving all of IC's messages.

Alert Webmaster & Moderators Already alerted!  Already alerted!

2 of 4 (50%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?
How do you feel about this message?     Agree     Disagree       Hide this question