Re: Vindication of Dr. Clark and Rife

"In your all knowing wisdom on this topic, have you ever considered that maybe she did not even try to diagnose herself."

Ahh, hit a sore point huh?  The woman was 80 years old.  I seriously doubt that she tried to diagnose herself because the medical doctor she saw did it for her - prior to her death.  It is medically impossible to list those things on a death certificate without both blood tests and bone marrow biopsies.  With that diagnosis prior to death there was no reason to do an autopsy on the body.

Any practitioner making the claims that Clark did - including her trumped up and erroneous diagnostic abilities, would have used her diagnostic abilities on herself.  By the time you hit 80 - unless your a marathoner, you have significant aches and pains that aren't explainable in ordinary fashion.

The spinal story that was originally published by the family turned out to be fake.  Had she died from neck/spine and shoulder injuries that would have been obvious at death.

There was obviously cancer in the family.  The woman couldn't cure her brother's cancer (that is a known fact) and she couldn't cure hers.  It's actually pretty simple.

Alert Webmaster & Moderators

2 of 5 (40%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?
How do you feel about this message?     Agree     Disagree       Hide this question