Re: Vindication of Dr. Clark and Rife

 >- quackery Zappers really are that does what to your Zapper sales

Sorry dude, you have entirely missed the boat. We have solid proof of efficacy for these applications.

So let's see this "solid proof".  Post the studies showing they really work.

And again, if they work then why did Clark and her brother both die of cancer?  Boy, you are going to have a hard time coming up with a good excuse for that one!!!

>- what does her age at time of death have to do with anything?

Everything. The very fact that she outlived the average age of survival in the U.S. makes a statement. I am not surprised to see you reject because it is not part of your holy grail. At the same point the statement that I posted shows that Doctors, on the average are less healthy than the rest of us. So, why the heck would we want to listen to them for health advice?

There you go again trying to act like an expert on things you clearly do not understand.  As you pointed out this is an average.  Yes, some people will make it over the average and some under the average.  That is why it is called an average.  George Burns smoked cigars and still lived to be over 100.  So does this mean that smoking cigars is healthy and everyone should do it?  Maybe he lived to be over 100 because of the anti-parasitical nicotine in his cigars.

Bottom line is that some people get luckily.  This can be from genetics, it can be from lack of stress, it can be from a long list of things.  So just because she managed to survive slightly over the average age of doctors means NOTHING!!!  How many doctors are being exposed to radiation and chemo drugs unlike Clark?  How many doctors are actually working in a stressful clinical situation unlike Clark?  Should I go on?  You are simply extrapolating whatever you can to try and help back your claims, but all you are doing is making yourself look more desperate and foolish!!!

>- only thing that is valid

What proof do you have that did did not have M.M. for 20 or even 30 years and the little use of the zapper that she had actually kept her going for that long?

Proof goes both ways.  So where is your proof that she did have multiple myeloma for all those years?  

But let's not forget that REGARDLESS of how long she had it that the Zapper failed to get rid of her cancer.  Same for her brother's cancer.  In other words the Zapper did not work in either case!!!  So you are providing the evidence that the Zappers are quackery by claiming that she may have had cancer longer although the Zappers never got rid of it.

Alert Webmaster & Moderators

1 of 3 (33%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?
How do you feel about this message?     Agree     Disagree       Hide this question