Re: Philosophical Question

Figures are manipulated, statistics fabricated.

From a theoretical/metaphysical standpoint the human body has the potential for immortality - a supposedly "long" life of one hundred and twenty years is far, far removed from the blissful, eternal existence we are all perfectly capable of.

There is no way on this earth that the current mortality rate is 77.6 years! One has to wonder exactly who these "officials" are. Disease and plague are rampant like never before (albeit under many guises), the only difference between "now" and "then" is that the majority exist in a perpetual state of drug-induced apathy, complacence and virtual non-existence.

The one hundred and twenty year existence refers to the second age of man (at best); this age heralded the dawn of deceit, gluttony and sexual depravity. It is somewhat harsh to state, but those insisting on over-feeding their degenerate selves can never expect to live a long, prosperous life (and they are hardly deserving of it). This is where something such as Breatharianism is so fascinating; for the intracellular waste that is the chief obliterator of humanity can not exist: the primary cause of "aging" and subsequent death is removed, leaving only environmental pollution for the timeless body to contend with...a pollution that will surely wane come the shift in consciousness that we all await.

Whether the life-expectancy in 1929 was fifty-three years or not is largely irrelevant; the farther back in time one chooses to look, the more innocent the people one must witness, and in my opinion there is certainly beauty in naivety pertaining to certain matters.

I lament contending with others over facts and figures and mortality rates for then and now. The average ingrate in the street assumes time began two thousand years ago and never once stops to ponder all that came before; entering into discussion with those who display this mindset is shown to be futile, time and time again.

However, I have rambled on enough. I only hope that something I have suggested makes at least one other view existence from a slightly different angle, or at the very least, that my "opinions" are somewhat coherent. This discussion could be most interesting, as it is clear to me in which way it is headed...

All the best to you, PBuddy,


Lee (TCF)

Alert Webmaster & Moderators