Re: Breast Cancer Diagnosis Application - 99% effective in diagnosis

In the case of a friend that I know who was correctly diagnosed with breast cancer two years ago and refused allopathic care and instead sought alternative treatment.  Then just a couple of months ago after the cancer had spread to her lymph nodes finally sought conventional medicine but alas, it was too late and has since that time passed away.

I am sorry to hear what happened with your friend.  However, what happened with one person is hardly sufficient to condemn altenative treatment entirely. First of all, there are over 350 different alternative therapies for cancer.  I bet you that your friend did not choose one of the better ones.  Secondly, mainstream treatments are no assurance of increased survival.  Overall, chemo treatments only increase survival by 2% over those who do not choose conventional treatment.  What mainstream considers success if 5 year survival.  Thus, the earlier the cancer is detected the greater the odds are for surviving 5 years - but that does not mean that the cancer is irradicated and will never return.  Most often it does return.  If cancer is not detected and treated until it has reached stage II, 5 year survival is less than 80&.  For stage III less than 50% and for stage IV less than 15%.

The best alternative treatments are successful the large majority of the time, including for late stage cancers provided that one does not wait until there is no time at all for treatment.  And, unlike conventional treatment, alternative treatments can not only eliminate the cancer but also address the root cause of the cancer and prevent its return.

Regardless of whether one chooses conventional or alternative treatment, they should regularly monitor their cancer.  If whatever they choose is not working, they should look for other options.

Alert Webmaster & Moderators

3 readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?
How do you feel about this message?     Agree     Disagree       Hide this question