Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet at Liver Flush Debate Forum (MessageID: 413078)

Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 April 2...

/114 1 BSA by Webmaster 8 year 42,128 3 of 4 (75%) Liver Flush Debate / Liver Flus / Liver Flus

Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...2 by resurrectionist 8 year 11,204 0 of 3 (0%)
- Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...3 by resurrectionist 8 year 10,574 0 of 3 (0%)
- Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...4 by plantsheal 8 year 10,511 1 of 2 (50%)
  - Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...5 by resurrectionist 8 year 10,160 0 of 4 (0%)
Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...6 by DangerousProduce 8 year 10,533 0 of 1 (0%)
Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...7 R by DangerousProduce 8 year 10,677 1 of 1 (100%)
Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...8 by spiralocean 8 year 10,134 0 of 2 (0%)
- Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...9 by Chaz 8 year 10,256 3 of 3 (100%)
  - Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...10 by spiralocean 8 year 9,968
    - Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...11 by Chaz 8 year 9,953
      - Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...12 by spiralocean 8 year 9,694
        
        Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...13 by #59001 7 year 9,709
        
        Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...14 by HMEPINOS 7 year 9,438
  - Re: Conspiracy Theories15 by spiralocean 8 year 10,099 1 of 1 (100%)
    - Re: Conspiracy Theories16 by Chaz 8 year 9,507
    - Re: Conspiracy Theories17 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,162 0 of 1 (0%)
      - Re: Conspiracy Theories18 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,320 0 of 2 (0%)
        
        Re: Conspiracy Theories19 by icky 8 year 9,350 0 of 1 (0%)
        
        Re: Conspiracy Theories20 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,295 0 of 1 (0%)
        
        Re: Conspiracy Theories /114 21 by icky 8 year 9,176
        
        Re: Conspiracy Theories22 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,192

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet23 by DangerousProduce 8 year 10,029 2 of 2 (100%)

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet24 by spiralocean 8 year 9,610

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet25 by DangerousProduce 8 year 9,455

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet26 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,191

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet27 R by johng 8 year 9,546 1 of 1 (100%)

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet28 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,157

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet 29 by johng 8 year 9,256

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet

Date: 5/31/2005 1:25:45 PM ( 8 year ago )
Hits: 9268 Size: 498 char.
URL: http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=413078

Bad Message Alert: Alert Moderators on This BAD Message

Good Message Alert: Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

clutching at straws? I don't see that at all. I'm sorry, but the points are raised and others raised are quite valid. Of course they are not convenient for your theory, but that does not make them invalid. The lancet did one experiment on one person. Somehow my mother-in-law got stones without using oil... the lancet article provides no explanation for this, do you?

because the article came from the lancet am i supposed to take it on faith, against my own personal experience?

John g

Add To Favorites!

Alert Webmaster & Moderators

How do you feel about this message? Agree Disagree Hide this question

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
How do you feel about this message? Agree Disagree Hide this question

This message was cross-posted across the next forums:

1. Liver Flush Debate Forum
2. Liver Flush Facts Forum
3. Liver Flush FAQ Forum

Reply to This Message

Use of CureZone is subject to the following Terms of Service

Important Disclaimer!
Answers, comments and opinions provided on CureZone are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. CureZone does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in messages, comments or articles on CureZone. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. Read more ...

Selected Ads from CureZone Sponsors

Original Hulda Clark $35
Parasites Cleanse, Kidney Cleanse, Bowel Cleanse, Liver Flush

Hulda Clark Cleanse Kits
New Lower Prices!!!

Hulda Clark Cleanse Kits
New Lower Prices!!!

Medically Proven Anti-Cancer Benefits
Medical researchers confirm electrolyzed reduced wate...

Medical FACT
Fact: Cancer Can Be Cured With Quercetin + Vitamin C For Only 6 Dollars!

Purest Body Products
No solvents, no heavy metals, organic, vegan, no animal testing

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet30 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,172
- Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet31 by johng 8 year 9,279 1 of 1 (100%)
  - Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet32 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,159
    - Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet33 by johng 8 year 9,054
      - face facts re green blobs johng34 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,142
        
        Re: face facts re green blobs johng35 by johng 8 year 9,190
        
        Re: face facts re green blobs johng36 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,226
        
        answer this.37 by johng 8 year 9,254
        
        green blobs38 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,336
        
        Re: green blobs39 by johng 8 year 9,249
        
        Re: green blobs40 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,092
        
        Re: green blobs /114 41 by johng 8 year 9,168
        
        Re: green blobs42 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,086
        
        Re: green blobs43 by johng 8 year 9,009
        
        Re: green blobs44 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,128
        
        Re: green blobs45 by johng 8 year 9,075
        
        Re: green blobs46 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,145
        
        exactly...47 by johng 8 year 9,024
        
        Re: exactly...48 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,178
        
        Re: exactly...49 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,041
        
        Re: exactly...50 by johng 8 year 9,087
        
        don't dodge - green blobs are potassium carboxylates51 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,206
        
        who is really dodging?52 by johng 8 year 9,082
        
        Re: who is really dodging?53 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,956
        
        Re: who is really dodging?54 by johng 8 year 9,130
        
        Re: who is really dodging?55 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,080
        
        Re: who is really dodging?56 by johng 8 year 9,085
        
        Re: who is really dodging?57 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,030
        
        Re: who is really dodging?58 by johng 8 year 9,165
        
        Re: who is really dodging?59 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,994
        
        Re: green blobs and blind faith60 by DangerousProduce 8 year 9,363 1 of 1 (100%)
        
        liver flush and blind faith /114 61 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,283
        
        Re: its your fixation62 by DangerousProduce 8 year 9,153
        
        ?????63 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,118

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet64 by #9122 8 year 9,115
- Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet65 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,036
  - Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet66 by #9122 8 year 8,938
    - Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet67 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,012
      - that's not an answer. n/m68 by johng 8 year 8,926
        
        it wasn't supposed to be69 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,817
      - Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet70 by DangerousProduce 8 year 9,136
        
        Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet71 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,935
        
        Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet72 by DangerousProduce 8 year 9,224
        
        Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet73 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,113
Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet74 by HMEPINOS 7 year 8,875

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet. 75 by #67307 7 year 9,063

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet76 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,128
- Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet77 by #9122 8 year 9,053
  - Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet78 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,943
    - Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet79 by johng 8 year 9,026
      - Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet80 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,959
        
        Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet /114 81 by johng 8 year 9,049
        
        clutching at straws82 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,231
        
        Re: clutching at straws83 by johng 8 year 9,095
        
        One blob is much the same as another84 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,125
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another85 by johng 8 year 9,051
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another86 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,866
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another87 by johng 8 year 9,052
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another88 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,839
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another89 by johng 8 year 9,026
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another90 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,980
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another91 by johng 8 year 8,992
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another92 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,005
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another93 by johng 8 year 9,129
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another94 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,905
        
        frustrated?95 by johng 8 year 9,089
        
        dodging again96 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,014
        
        Re: dodging again97 by MrCooties 8 year 9,159
        
        Re: dodging again98 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,863
        
        Re: dodging again99 by MrCooties 8 year 9,085
        
        Re: dodging again100 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,025
        
        Re: dodging again /114 101 by MrCooties 8 year 8,894
        
        Re: dodging again102 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,113
        
        Re: One blob is much the same as another103 by HMEPINOS 7 year 9,090
        
        Re: clutching at straws104 by #9122 8 year 9,182
        
        Re: clutching at straws105 by resurrectionist 8 year 8,996
        
        Re: clutching at straws106 by DangerousProduce 8 year 9,126
        
        Re: clutching at straws107 by resurrectionist 8 year 9,150
        
        Re: clutching at straws108 by HMEPINOS 7 year 9,056

Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...109 RN by capco 8 year 9,978
- Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...110 by relpub3 7 year 9,333
  - Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...111 by HMEPINOS 7 year 9,037
Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...112 by HMEPINOS 7 year 9,069
Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...113 by VX 6 year 9,130
Re: Could these be Gallstones? The Lancet Volume 365, Number 9468 16 Apr...114 by healthsage 31 mon 5,631

How can I view entire discussion thread on a single page?

How can I expand all forum messages on a single forum page?

Translate This Page:

Re: ...on tests and testing in Lancet

Translate This Page: