My search at the Rife Conference

I went to the Rife Conference a couple of weeks ago with the mission to find the ultimate electronic device that would not just be a frequency generator but one that could be sophisticated enough to supply me with the exact frequencies that was in me that were harmful to me.

I got to have a close up look at Beam Rays, F-scan 2, F160, the Molecular enhancer, Multiple Wave Oscillators, Photon Sound Beams,Pap-Imi Magnetic Pulsers, Gas Plasma Ray Tubes, the Advance Bio-Photon Analyzer and the Ergonom microscope presentations.

In the exhibition rooms, everyone had there machines on full blast. The energy emmited could almost knock you over. I felt the vibrations from my toes and throughout my body. I was being zapped whether I needed it or not.

All of the devices could be programmed to emit a frequency or a set of frequencies. Some had higher outputs than others. The choices were either use a contact device like pipe handholds to receive the zaps,or the receive the frequency without touching handholds through harmonic antennea or with the use of plasma tubes. The Molecular Enhancer required the user to hold the plasma bulb while sitting with bare feet on a metal contact on the machine which is on the floor. Just walking a few feet from that was enough to make me queasy.

My interests lead me to the F-scan 2 which scanned me. Out came a list of frequencies which meant nothing to me. What were they? The man running the machine didn't know, but if I wanted to I could zap them. That was unscientific. What if a frequency was my lunch, or a vibration from something in the room, or a protein, or something good that I need in my body?

So off to see Dr. Sutherland and his explaination. He refers to himself as using “Shamanism and high tech” to serve his patients.

Currently, he is using the F-scan2 and / or the F160 with the Advanced Bio Photon Analyzer and a dowsing rod for remote applications as well as in house patient applications.

So when he runs a scan, the frequencies found in the body are numerous. To determine which ones to treat, he uses his metal dowsing rod to test the patient. That is where Shamanism comes into play. It is working for him.

Again I say, not scientific enough.

Wasn't anyone able to replicate Dr. Royal Rife's experiments to find specific frequencies? Dr. Rife used his specially made microscope capable of seeing 60,000 times larger, and seeing the specimens alive the whole time. Then when he applied his photon beam for only a few seconds, he could actually see the parasite die.

But Rife's microscopes, only 5 built, are not working, missing parts, and no one knows how to build one. I was fortunate to get to see original blueprints at the convention brought by a special man. They were given to him my a woman who had them in her attic. They were drawn up by Mr. Bare as best as he could. Talk was wild when they were unrolled in the lobby of the hotel. Did Dr. Rife use quartz in his prisms? Did he use Maglluminum as the prism shroud? And on and on.

But in the end, only the Ergonom 500 microscope is the closest and best to help researchers replicate and continue to visually see and find the effects of different frequencies on parasites, bacteria, and fungi. But the price starts at $150,000 and goes up from there. Luckily for us, the Grayfield Optical company who makes this great microscope is making an affordable blood microscope specifically for following Rife's work. It is to come out next year.

So, for now I go back to the F-scan2. I asked how many frequencies are programmed into the F-scan2 that have been identified. The answer: Well, all 350 that are listed, tested and found by Dr. Hulda Clark using her syncrometer are progammed into the F-scan2! And not even a thank you Dr. Clark.

So what a revelation that was.

So I asked Dr. Clark if she recommended her patients to the F-scan2. She said she did not know how that machine operated. The answer was no.

So back to the F-scan2 for an experiment. My friend was scanned. Then all frequencies that the machine came up were written down. The she was re-scanned immediately. The numbers were written down again. To our surprise, they were all different. We wanted an explaination. The salesman could not figure out why that should happen. We thought it should have been consistant, but the results were not.

So, the conclusion, the syncrometer won hands down for the ultimate testing device. Even though I thought it was cumbersome, hard to learn, old fashioned, I was wrong. It is the only way to test ourselves to be sure that we did knock out the pathogen etc. with the right frequency or other method.

This technology of using an audio oscilloscope to hear whether something is in us or not through resonance by putting our bodies into the circuit is very sophisticated and yet simple. It is genius.

Until the blood microscope comes out and researchers can visually search for more kill frequencies, the syncrometer is a must have device. And zapping by any method will continue to be a hit or miss method for eliminating what ails us, unless we learn to use the syncrometer.

So for now a simple zapper or frequency generator connected to a plate zapping box is the most sure way to target pathogens at specific locations. It is sure. And the notion that a 32 KHz zapper is not strong enough to do this job in unfounded and untrue.
If a person wanted to zap the brain for a certain bacteria, a brain sample would be placed on one plate for the target, and the bacteria on the other plate to zap. This is a small example of the possiblities of plate zapping which will soon become the mainstream method of use because of its ease of use. The frequency number does not need to be known!

All in all the conference was a revelation. The people who attended were all good natured and intent on making a difference.
It was a great experience.

Mrs. Lightning

Alert Webmaster & Moderators Already alerted!  Already alerted!

9 of 11 (81%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?
How do you feel about this message?     Agree     Disagree       Hide this question