CureZone.com
   Home > Article Index > Abscess > Medical Fraud

• Go Back

Reprinted from:
http://www.dollarsandsense.org/2002/orlando0302.htm

Industry Attacks on Dissent: From Rachel Carson to Oprah

dollarsandsense.org

Industry Attacks on Dissent: From Rachel Carson to Oprah

Forty years after the publication of Silent Spring, corporations are still producing poisons—and still trying to keep critics from fighting back.

BY LAURA ORLANDO

published at:
http://www.dollarsandsense.org/2002/orlando0302.htm


In March 1996, the British government announced that ten people had died after eating beef from cattle sick with "mad cow disease." A month later, financier, movie actress, and talk-show host Oprah Winfrey discussed the topic on national television. While interviewing guest Howard Lyman of the Humane Society about his belief that American cattle might be at risk for the disease, Winfrey told her audience, "It has just stopped me cold from eating another burger." A group of Texas cattle ranchers sued Winfrey and Lyman for libeling cattle. Four years and over $1 million later, the two were vindicated in court.

Winfrey and Lyman were sued under the Texas False Disparagement of Perishable Food Products Act. Food disparagement laws are a new tool in an old bag of tricks used by corporations to protect their own economic interests at the expense of public discussion. Silencing public debate with frivolous, time-consuming, and costly lawsuits has become so commonplace that the technique has its own name: strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPP suits.

Winfrey and Lyman won in lower federal court because the judge ruled that cattle were not "perishable food products." The cattlemen pursued the matter in appellate court. A three-judge panel eventually ruled against the Texas ranchers. But the SLAPP suit achieved its objective by forcing Winfrey and Lyman to spend an enormous amount of time and money defending themselves—and by serving as a warning to the rest of us that saying what we believe to be true may cost us more than we can bear.

Lawsuits, and the threat of lawsuits, are not the only means industry uses to stifle dissent. Industry routinely buys the science that suits its needs (tobacco is a good example) and according to Sheldon Rampton, editor of the newsletter PR Watch, spends at least $10 billion every year on "public relations."

Industry's use of half-truths and intimidation to defend its toxic assault on life is nothing new. But until 40 years ago, when Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring was published, one could argue that we—the people—didn't know what was going on. Silent Spring woke up the nation, creating a national consciousness about the health and environmental consequences of pesticide use. Industry woke up too. Bruce Johnson, a Seattle lawyer, told the New York Times in 1999, "If [food disparagement laws] had been in place in the 1960s, Rachel Carson might not have found a publisher willing to print Silent Spring."







Trying to Silence Silent Spring

Before World War I, about half of the industrial products in the United States were made from renewable resources, such as plant-, wood-, and animal-based materials. In the 1920s and 1930s, oil and chemical companies like Union Carbide, Shell, and Dow expanded their interest in petrochemical manufacturing. The petrochemical industry, strengthened immensely by World War II, replaced renewable materials with synthetic organic compounds made from the by-products of oil and natural gas: for instance, synthetic rubber replaced natural rubber, chemical detergents replaced animal-based soaps, and polyester replaced cotton. In the 1950s and 1960s, the thriving plastics industry accelerated the shift even more. Today, 92% of the materials used for U.S. products and production processes are nonrenewable.

In many cases, the processes used to manufacture synthetic products created toxic wastes, and often the products themselves—either intact or when dissipated into the environment—were harmful to life. Among the most lethal of these products were synthetic pesticides. Before 1940, most pesticides were made from plants; a few were made from toxic metals like arsenic and mercury. But the synthetic chemicals created for chemical warfare during World War II were found to be highly effective weed and insect killers. So in 1945, with strong government backing, these poisons entered commercial markets. Within ten years, synthetic pesticides had captured 90% of the agricultural pest-control market. Pesticides such as dichloro diphenyl trichloroethane (DDT), dieldrin, and aldrin were dropped from planes like bombs over Dresden. State and federal government agencies blanketed neighborhoods with poisons in an attempt to eradicate pests like gypsy moths and Japanese beetles. Farmers used DDT and other synthetic insecticides on a variety of crops, including cotton, peanuts, and soybeans. Suburbanites embraced the new chemicals in their war against perceived nuisances like crab grass and dandelions.

Few people understood the dangers to life that these new chemicals presented. Sickness and death among chemical manufacturing workers were sometimes the first indication that the materials they worked with were toxic. But most people believed that you had to be an industrial worker to get sick. Rachel Carson's Silent Spring was the first widely read publication to say that everybody was being poisoned.

Silent Spring was serialized by The New Yorker in June 1962 and came out in book form that same year. The book was—and still is—a devastating testament to the mortal dangers of synthetic chemical poisons. Carson, a wildlife biologist with two best sellers and a National Book Award under her belt, wrote, "We allow the chemical death rain to fall as though there were no alternative, whereas in fact there are many, and our ingenuity could soon discover many more if given opportunity."

Silent Spring was written before big business politics and sophistry were so well versed at setting the terms of discourse about environmental issues. Still, during the four years that Carson spent writing the book, she was well aware that it would unleash the wrath of the chemical industry. Deeply concerned about potential industry attacks and lawsuits, she did what she could to protect herself. Carson and her literary agent Marie Rodell asked lawyers from Houghton Mifflin, her publisher, to review the manuscript. Carson made sure Houghton Mifflin had libel insurance and she renegotiated a contract with them that put a monetary limit on her personal liability. And building the best defense of all, she meticulously checked her facts and diligently worked on a list of principal sources to document her conclusions.

Carson's concerns were well founded. After The New Yorker serialized parts of the book, the New York Times ran an article with the headline, " ‘Silent Spring' Is Now Noisy Summer: Pesticide Industry Up In Arms Over a New Book." The story began, "The $300,000,000 pesticides industry has been highly irritated by a quiet woman author whose previous works on science have been praised for the beauty and precision of the writing." It quoted the president of the Montrose Chemical Corporation—a major manufacturer of DDT, a pesticide that Carson discussed at length—as saying that Carson wrote not "as a scientist but rather as a fanatic defender of the cult of the balance of nature."

Some of the criticism seems laughable now. After the second installment from Silent Spring appeared in The New Yorker, a man from California wrote to the magazine:

Miss Rachel Carson's reference to the selfishness of insecticide manufacturers probably reflects her Communist sympathies, like a lot of our writers these days. We can live without birds and animals, but, as the current market slump shows, we cannot live without business. As for insects, isn't it just like a woman to be scared to death of a few little bugs! As long as we have the H-bomb everything will be O.K. P.S. She's probably a peace-nut too.

But industry's attack on Rachel Carson was swift and vicious. The chemical companies banded together and hired a public relations firm to malign the book and attack Carson's credibility. The pesticide industry trade group, the National Agricultural Chemicals Association, spent over $250,000 (equivalent to $1.4 million today) to denigrate the book and its author. The company that manufactured and sold the pesticides chlordane and heptachlor, the Velsicol Chemical Company of Chicago, threatened to sue Houghton Mifflin.

Milton Greenstein, legal counsel and vice president of The New Yorker, was called by at least one chemical company and told that the magazine would be sued if it didn't pull the last installment it planned to run of Carson's book. Greenstein responded, "Everything in those articles has been checked and is true. Go ahead and sue." John Vosburgh, editor of Audubon Magazine, which published excerpts from Silent Spring, said pretty much the same thing when Audubon was threatened. According to Carson biographer Linda Lear, Velsicol's lawyers suggested to Vosburgh that printing "a muckraking article containing unwarranted assertions about Velsicol pesticides" might "jeopardize [the] financial security" of magazine employees and their families. Vosburgh was so incensed that he wrote an editorial that appeared with the book excerpts, criticizing the chemical industry's response.

Industry threats did not stop the publication of Silent Spring, nor did the attacks prevent the book from becoming wildly successful. Carson was a popular writer who had the support of her editors, her publisher, and even President Kennedy, who cited Silent Spring as a reason to examine the health effects of pesticides. After the book was published, Carson was interviewed by Eric Severeid on national television and she testified before Congress about chemical poisons. She was profiled in Life magazine and featured in the New York Times and the Washington Post. In a review for the Book-of-the-Month Club, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas wrote that Silent Spring "is a call for immediate action and for effective control of all merchants of poison," and called the book "the most important chronicle of this century for the human race."

Carson effectively got her message across in part because what she had to say was radically new to the public, because her facts were unassailable, and because industry, though quite capable of attacking her and the publications that featured her work, had not yet learned how to overload the media—and by extension the people—with its own point of view.


Read whole article here:

Reprinted from:
http://www.dollarsandsense.org/2002/orlando0302.htm

Related
News
DMD Epidemic on the Rise   Feb 08 2003
FLU JAB KILLS RITA (66)  Nov 25 2002
5 suffered muscle-wasting disease after flu vaccination  Nov 25 2002
Flu shot left executive paralyzed  Nov 25 2002
Leeches reduce the pain of osteoarthritis  Nov 22 2002
MMR-vaksinen kan gi barn autisme  Nov 19 2002
Bacteria Promote Vessel Growth in Gut  Nov 06 2002
Anthrax drug blamed for lingering ailments  Oct 22 2002
Vaccination in Animals  Oct 03 2002
New concerns over breast screening  Sep 25 2002
The Truth about Osteoporosis  Aug 30 2002
The Grisanti Report  Aug 30 2002
What Every Hypothyroid Patient Should Know about Synthroid  Aug 30 2002
HOW TO LOWER YOUR CHOLESTEROL  Aug 30 2002
Autism 'Linked to Mercury Vaccine'  Aug 16 2002
Autism and Mercury  Aug 16 2002
Vitamin A -- A Vital Nutrient  Aug 12 2002
Oppose Senator Frist's Vaccine Bill S 2053  Aug 12 2002
Death By Lethal Vaccine Injection  Aug 09 2002
Conventional vs. Alternative Medicine  Aug 06 2002
When Healing Becomes a Crime  Jul 29 2002
New England Journal loosens its rules on conflict of interest  Jun 26 2002
How You Can Avoid Having a Premature Baby  Jun 26 2002
Hospitalization Can Traumatize a Child  Jun 15 2002
New cholesterol guidelines for converting healthy people into patients  Jun 15 2002
The Cholesterol Myths  Jun 15 2002
THE FRIGHTENING ROAD AHEAD FOR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS  Jun 14 2002
Medical Journal Changes Policy of Finding Independent Doctors to Write  Jun 14 2002
WHAT THE FDA, CDC, ACIP AND INDUSTRY WON’T TELL YOU ABOUT THE MERCURY IN VACCINES  Jun 11 2002
My Personal Experience, Healing Multiple Sclerosis  Jun 10 2002
Mercury in Childhood Vaccines: What Did the Government Know?  Jun 08 2002
The Danger of MSG and How it is Hidden in Vaccines  Jun 08 2002
Update on CDC Plans to Force Smallpox Vaccine on the US  Jun 08 2002
My husband's full recovery from lung tumor and massive heart attack without drugs/chemo/surgery  Jun 07 2002
A doctor diagnosed me as having AIDS  Jun 07 2002
New Drugs Same As The Old Drugs?  May 30 2002
Beating Multiple Sclerosis  May 29 2002
Hospital Drug-Error Trends Continue  May 29 2002
My Fight Against Multiple Sclerosis  May 29 2002
Some pain killers may delay bone healing  May 28 2002
Most Women Satisfied With Having Their Healthy Breasts Removed  May 28 2002
Insulin and Estrogen linked to Breast Cancer  May 28 2002
Hormone Replacement Casually Related to Breast Cancer  May 28 2002
Pesticides Increase Breast Cancer Risk  May 28 2002
Healthy Women Having Their Breasts Removed  May 28 2002
Unnecessary Mastectomies  May 28 2002
Pesticides and the Immune System: The Public Health Risks  May 23 2002
An interview with Sue Best whose son Billy is over 7 years cancer free  May 21 2002
Raw Eating - A book by A.T. Hovannessian (Aterhov)  May 21 2002
Dr. Clark's - Letter to the "Health Freedom Movement"  May 18 2002
Infant food industry's practices in the US and Canada !!!  May 18 2002
Action group urges Britain to withdraw acne drug Roaccutane  May 18 2002
Want a Healthy Heart? Drink Water  May 16 2002
POISON FOR PROFIT - WHAT A BUSINESS PLAN!  May 16 2002
The Truth is Out There   May 16 2002
Do Killer Microbes Cause Breast Cancer?  May 15 2002
Why Do Pharmaceutical Drugs Injure and Kill?  May 15 2002
Are Vaccines Causing More Disease Than They are Curing?  May 15 2002
Fluoride and Aluminum - toxic combination of fluoroaluminum complex   May 15 2002
Medical Patents and the WTO  May 08 2002
A Chronology of Fluoridation  May 08 2002
Fish Oil Helps Prevent Diabetes  May 08 2002
Excitotoxins - MSG and Aspartame  May 03 2002
COLORADO bill to add Hepatitis A Vaccine  May 02 2002
Safety of New Drugs Cannot Be Known for Many Years  May 01 2002
Ulcer surgery linked to risk of pancreatic cancer  Apr 30 2002
Minnesota - the first US State to offer Freedom of Choice  Apr 30 2002
Patients Turn to Nutrition to Help in War on Cancer  Apr 30 2002
Hudfletter forskerne som slo kreftalarm  Apr 27 2002
Swedish Study of Food and Cancer Rings Alarm Bells  Apr 24 2002

Back To Top


 

Donate to CureZone

Contact Us - About - Sponsors - Stats

Link Exchange - Add URL - How To Exchange Links?

Terms of Service - Privacy Policy - Spam Policy - Disclaimer - Guidelines & Rules

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https:www.netatlantic.com


Copyright 2021  curezone.com

0.2188 sec from 3.236.28.137