Compassionate eugenics is exactly what is occurring on the planet. We are controlling ourselves. World population is in an implosion - self imposed. (Except possibly for China where the government is controlling population growth - but that presents some really weird problems too.) The "population explosion" of the past few decades has not been caused by reproduction, but by better healthcare world wide and the advent of more people surviving to a much older age. In 1950 only one black African child made it to age ten. Today from what I can find out it is now about nine out of ten make it to age ten. In 1948 - the year that the Communists took over China, the average life expectancy there was twenty seven years. Today it is around seventy. In spite of everything you see on curezone, health care for everyone - including those in the United States, has improved and our life expectancy is much longer. We are in a population decline due to personal choice. Italy's population will decline by half by the year 2050. More and more Italian 'boys' are living with their parents and never marry. Marriage everywhere is no longer an ultimate goal for many.
Europe's population is expected to decrease from 728 million now to 658 million by 2050, due to declining birth rates. June 8, 2000 ENN/AP
February 15, 2000 CNA Mainland China Facing Aging Population Problem. Due to its one-child policy, China's number of elderly people may triple from 130 million to 400 million over the next five years, according to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). Currently one young person in mainland China supports an average of four elderly people.February 15, 2000 CNA
About 1780, about the time of Malthus' dire predicitons, families in Europe began cutting back the number of children they had, raising fewer children not because of disease or famine but because they chose to - perhaps because more children were more expensive to raise, and when city life and education became a factor, fewer children meant a better life for the family. But, like braking a speeding train, slowing population growth doesn't happen all at once. June 21, 2000 Christian Science Monitor
The "population explosion" of the past few decades has not been caused by reproduction, but by better healthcare world wide and the advent of more people surviving to a much older age.
Personally, I do not agree with the assertions of Christian Science Monitor. The "population explosion" of the past few decades may just as well be caused by mythology spread by a controlled media, which is to say, there is no actual population explosion going on, but instead, there is a "population explosion" being reported. It is difficult to ignore that the better the thought can be established that a population explosion is occuring, the more this helps further the cause of seemingly separate, distinct other agendas also endeavoring to convince the world of a particular something.... like, convincing the world that it's climate is in a grave, warming condition. Granted, for anyone disagreeing with these kinds of assertions, it certainly does not help the cause of disagreeing that there are A) no independent sources universally agreed as being an organization trusted to accurately study and report the validity of this kind of assertion and B) even if there was such an independent research body, there is no independent media available for them to get out to the public whatever genuine infromation they have to report. A great example of this dilemma is that somebody can assert any claim they want no matter how unsubstantiated such claims may inherently be; like, that there is better healthcare being experienced world wide, and follow this up with the assertion that people are surving to a much older age. Again, who is somebody that is known to be a legitimately qualified, independent organization qualified to gather these kinds of statistics, and where is the media outlet that is proven to be an unbiased outlet for reporting whatever kinds of statistics there are to report?
It is also my opinion that it takes a social engineer being behind an establishment reported by a controlled media to invent phrases of language constructed of, for instance, diamtrically opposed terms; compassionate; eugenics.... which seems just a warm N fuzzy way of saying "killing me softly" Just think about it. Every time a life is intentionally snuffed out, the media can report this as improved healthcare for the still living life, who can then be advertised that, thanks to it's benevolent establishment, it has a better chance at being fed a meal for another day while also living in a sligthly cooler world. The tag team of Orwell and Bernays could not have written and subsequently spun better.... marketed, selective murder. The trend that is being revealed here seems to be one where those who do not value the preserving of life other than their own want to be the ones dictating to other people they must die, for the greater good, of course. Once again, the world as we are told it is is upside down from what it is.
Here is a novel idea. As a prerequisite for operating the institute in charge of snuffing out lives, people advocating this policy must, as a token that they truly do believe deeply in this view, take their own life as credible evidence that they really stand behind such philosophy. This might just allow people who truly deserve to live to live, and those who truly deserve to die to die.
"It is also my opinion that it takes a social engineer being behind an establishment reported by a controlled media to invent phrases of language constructed of, for instance, diamtrically opposed terms; compassionate; eugenics.... which seems just a warm N fuzzy way of saying "killing me softly""
I love your paranoia. I was raised in the world or paranoids (literally -there are millions of youse guys out there), but have escaped. Best to you on your path.