McCain Will Win 
VOR
13 years ago
1,081
MoreObama will lose because:
1 - He is outside the mainstream group think.
a. I have often said most Americans do not subscribe to the gospel of the extreme left OR the extreme right.
b. Most Americans remain centrists and jealously protective of their guaranteed inalienable rights.
2 - He is THE most liberal (and disingenuous) Senator in the country.
3 - Unanswered questions and deep doubt.
a. Occidental College records -- Not released?
b. Columbia College records -- Not released?
c. Columbia Thesis paper -- Not available?
d. Harvard College records -- Not released?
e. Selective Service Registration -- Not released?
f. Medical records -- Not released?
g. Illinois State Senate schedule -- Not available?
h. Illinois State Senate records -- Not available?
i. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate -- Not released?
j. Record of your baptism -- Not available?
4 - His "redistribution of wealth" gaff.
5 - His waffle on direct talks with real and perceived enemies.
6 - A growing concern (even among his supporters) that he will say whatever is necessary but cannot be trusted to do what he says.
Full article here:
http://www.newswithviews.com/metcalf/metcalf267.htm
VOR
More
- He might, but I do not think that is... Dquixote1217
13 years ago
919
MoreThis is a reply to # 1,282,580
Most Americans remain centrists and jealously protective of their guaranteed inalienable rights.
Most Americans have been lulled to sleep by the controlled mass media, entertainment and publishing industries and have no clue as to what inalienable rights even are. If they did, they would realize just how much those rights have been trampled on dating back generations and accelerating in recent decades.
No one who runs in the charade we call a free and democratic presidential election that give us only two viable parties and two pre-approved candidates represents our inalienable rights. They represent the cabal of international bankers and other elite who would ultimately enslave us under a one world order.
The socialistic Obama is the teflon coated "New Messiah" who is the first choice of the elite, but they also have the backup choice firmly in hand with the neo-con coporatist McCain and the clueless VP candidate Palin who would be the biggest puppet ever for president in the very likely event that McCain did not finish out his term
Simply defeating Obama does not solve the problem because the choice comes down to socialistic change that no one seems to really understand or continued corporatism like we have seen the last eight years which many do not want. Either way, they both lead to totalitarianism.
But you do hit on the real problem - our inalienable (or unalienble) rights that were declared in the Declaration and supposedly secured by the Constitution. Until we demand politicians from the local level on up who will work as our servants and be faithful to the Constitution we will continue to lose our rights and travel further down the road to enslavement.
DQ
- Edited #28187
13 years ago
865
- Re: Clarify the Phrase,One World Ord... Dquixote1217
13 years ago
874
This is a reply to # 1,282,703
That is the plan. So far precious little has been done to stop it.
DQ
- Edited #28187
13 years ago
860
This is a reply to # 1,282,717Well DQ, if they create this one world government ,how are they going to have wars?
Wars are one of the principle ways of the elite rich use to make themselves richer. They own and and control the military industrial complex. Wars enrich those corporations as well as allow them to exploit resources in other countries. Wars are used to justify corporate welfare which enables the transfer of wealth from the middleclass and poor to the elite rich.
So if there is one world government , you cant have wars, therefore the entire MIC is
useless. I cant see the advantage to that for the elite rich stockholders.
I do see the elite rich in certain areas as attempting to consolidate power, as in the NAU or EU, or some far eastern union, or south american union.- Re: ONe Government means no wars? Dquixote1217
13 years ago
906
This is a reply to # 1,282,732Advertisement
Free Remineralizer for your Teeth
Best Teeth Remineralization, Strengthening, and Cleaning
Stockholders? Did you see in stockholders in Russia or China back during the bad old days? No, you saw only the privileged few, a lesser group of their top operatives, managers and informants and an enslaved population - as well as the elimination of virtually all opposition.
When you own it all, there is no need to enrich yourself. Especially when you have reduced the total population to 500 million, their stated goal, by eliminating the useless eaters. The military will still be useful enforce order and snuff out dissidents, as well as to enable them to plunder the third world countries resources at will - though one might imagine that eventually they will fall out amongst themselves..
DQ
- Edited #28187
13 years ago
888
This is a reply to # 1,282,746Its hard to believe thats our future but it certainly is our past and history always repeats itself. Bush and Osama hand in hand.
- Re: Like in the USA in 1859 in the s... Dquixote1217
13 years ago
881
This is a reply to # 1,282,814
Maybe like a plantation with a cruel plantation owner in the South, but not like the entire South. You seem to have a stereotypical and erroneous view of the South being one big Uncle Tom's Cabin.
DQ
- Re: Like in the USA in 1859 in the s... Dquixote1217
13 years ago
881
- Edited #28187
13 years ago
888
- Re: ONe Government means no wars? Dquixote1217
13 years ago
906
- Edited #28187
13 years ago
860
- Re: Clarify the Phrase,One World Ord... Dquixote1217
13 years ago
874
- Re: He might, but I do not think tha... VOR
13 years ago
983
This is a reply to # 1,282,647Well, you've covered yourself. The Conspiracy lives no matter who gets elected right? I agree with a lot of what you stated, except do not agree its due to conspiring forces.
There are certainly philosophical movements in the world pushing hard for their way of life (always has been), but that doesn't mean there is some "master plan" with a few people in a booth pushing the control buttons. In America we have nobody to blame for our loss of liberty except our lazy selves. We've allowed this to happen for the most part.
McCain became the candidate because conservatives couldn't produce anyone electable. Palin is far more intelligent that you give her credit for. I don't think you can form an accurate assessment of intelligence without meeting someone in person. Opinions formed based on SNL skits and media are always extreme distortions because their portrayals are designed to sell or make you laugh. However, the obsession with her tells me how much of a philosophical threat she must be to some. I met her once (believe it or not). I used to fly planes in Alaska.
Take care,
VOR
- Edited #28187
13 years ago
865
- Re: McCain Will Win, damn straight a... woody7
13 years ago
949
This is a reply to # 1,282,580of course he will win meaning McCain,as of today the ap poll has it even,all the others blow,the american people know if obiden ticket wins everyone will get taxed and well become a 3rd world country.we will lose are rights,talk radio will be gone,but the left wing dicks will still be around,thats ok, my ass dont be fooled people obam ass is in for a rude awakening come election day
- If McCain Wins #59245
13 years ago
899
This is a reply to # 1,282,723I predict that he will be unable to fulfill his duty within 2 years, and you will be dealing with President Palin.
In this election. the VP running mate of McCain should be scrutinized as closely as the President.
So if you believe that Sarah Palin is fit to be our President, then I guess you've made your bed.
Ain't going to happen anyway, but man what a nightmare scenario.
- If McCain Wins #59245
13 years ago
899
- He might, but I do not think that is... Dquixote1217
13 years ago
919
