I corrected that in less than a minute, as it was a mistake, in fact you actually had to write in your name in the title when you responded because there were no posts made in response to it at the time. I checked. To me, this is more sensationalism. I would appreciate it if you would try not to do that.
"again, you are
trying to demonize me as if I were making a
mountain out of a mole hill."
"Do you really not understand why people are
concerned that your posts indicate that you
are/were involved in a cover-up of this man's
Yes, because I have seen you and others post on the conspiracy forums. But, there was no cover-up, so I can't make up one, nor do I want to.
"People were hurt and that is my motivation for
being noisy and registering my own concerns
that keeping posts with his picture on it
legitimizes him and that you purposefully
took the time to hide information which could
have influenced others choices to seek this
dentist out. We will never know how many posts
were hidden or deleted here and at yahoo and
wherever else you had the influence to deal
with posts, but that you did it was/is the
issue, not how many times it was done."
You can leave the picture if you want, it is up to you, but you are keeping something that you accused me of keeping intentionally in order to send patients to Morales and that was not the case.
As I told you, If Morales was upset with a post being on the net, he would ask it be removed. I contacted the webmasters and I told them what he said. Then, if they agreed, they took it off. I probably had about 5 posts removed, give or take a couple. One was a lady who found gold in her bridges and said Morales poisoned her with metal. But, you have to remember that I dd not remove the posts, the webmasters did. It was not up to me, it was up to them. Morales said they were not true and I believed him. I do not consider that a cover-up. I consider that believing what he said, and obviously so did the webmasters.