CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: The NIST 911 Report On The World Trade Center Collapse
chris10 Views: 2,461
Published: 13 years ago
This is a reply to # 1,226,729

Re: The NIST 911 Report On The World Trade Center Collapse

sirius writes that fires didnt contribute to the collapses on 911 and cites as evdence that the jet fuel was consumed in minutes . There were roughly 14 million pounds of highly combustible material in wtc 1&2. No amount of evidence will shake curezone forum members beliefs because they are brainwashed by Conspiracy theorists.
The NIST did not apologize for not being able to explain how the towers could collapse without explosives and the collapses can be logically explained . Given the evidence ,its illogical to conclude explosives were used . Were the thousands of recovery people who didnt find det cord, shock tubes, blasting cap remnants, copper backing , burns on clean cut edges of columns etc all part of the Conspiracy .
Were the seismologists who said the data was inconsistent with controlled demolitionnpart of the conspiracy?
Pulverization of concrete , even in a demolition , has nothing to do with explosives. Gravity reduces buildings to rubble and dust. Thousands of tons above a given piece of concrete smash it like a hydraulic press. Explosions dont heat up any significant quantity of metal because energy is dissapated in shock waves.Explosives are used to cut not heat melt or pulverize .

Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2021

0.797 sec, (1)