The same can be asked of proponents of the so called flush. Where are the before and after ultrasounds showing stones before the flush and none after? Where are copies of the lab analysis showing that what was passed were really gallstones? What kind of gallstoens were they? Not all Gallstones are the same.
Why don' you just tell us how these stones are formed? Or at least how he claims thay are formed, and I can tell you if he is correct.
I do agree lecithin is good. Do you know why it works though? It actually goes back to why most Gallstones form. And by the way, lecithin will not work fast enough for a stone lodged in a bile duct. These should be removed immediately, and requires emergency surgery. This is another reason I do not recommend these flushes as they can lodge a stone in the bile ducts if they are really present. Do you know why these flushes can lodge a stone in the bile ducts? Just curious because I want to see how much you really know about the process.
Then you state: "My contention is that the stones I've purged from my body are of a similar chemical makeup and appearance as those entities that are found in surgically removed gallbladders." I would like to point out the obvious to you. "Similar in makeup and appearance" does not mean that they are the same thing. Fructose and glucose both look alike and contain C6H12O6, yet they are not the same thing. So that is far from evidence that what you supposedly had analyzed were gallstones.