CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: My 'vitalizer plus' experience and questions
 
Waterdoc Views: 16,869
Published: 15 years ago
 
This is a reply to # 1,310,421

Re: My 'vitalizer plus' experience and questions


Hydration is fundamental to good bowel movements, and the Vitalizer Plus increases hydration substantially. The energies also provide the body's organisms with support so that they can do their jobs more efficiently. When you are tired, you don't work well. When you have lots of energy you do better. So it seems with your bowels and the rest of your body. The energy from the Vitalizer Plus is very stable and works throughout the body, retaining structure. Dr. Mu Shik Jhon stated that ionizers produce very unstable structure and have little effect on the rest of the body other than the bowels. The bowels are very important however. With the Vitalizer Plus, you have the most important aspect of your health, hydration with pure water, taken care of other than possibly finding more harmonics from water catalysts like QuantaWater or Perfect Balance spray. To say it costs too much at under $500, or under $900 when paired with a solid RO or Distiller, is ridiculous. People are spending $2000 to $4000 on ionizers that are planting toxic time bombs in their bowels and bodies. The water is the key. Take herbs, foods or nourishment without enough water and you are not going to see results. Go to
http://www.wellnesslecture.com
and use the curezone link to get in at no cost. Watch "Adrenal Exhaustion 2008" to understand more clearly. Hope this helps. And let go of the ORP thing.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2023  curezone.com

0.453 sec, (1)