Don't know who you are or where you come up with this statement as I have not posted here before. As stated I saw the ruckus about liver flushing and responded with my experience. If the forum owner, whoever that is, does not allow discussion of liver flushing how was I to know this? I just logged on, I saw no sign or notice that certain health issues were taboo.
f you are not the forum owner why are you telling me this? If the forum owner does not want to discuss liver flushing then he / she could just say so, I will abide by the same rules as everyone else. Casual observation of this forum does not indicate that liver flushing is off limits, to the contrary, there has been significant liver flush discussion here very recently.
I have no problem with discussing liver flushing IF people want to back up their claims with evidence. What I don't tolerate is empty debate like the poster in the last thread on the subject. Just saying I am wrong, then that I am double wrong is not providing evidence and therefore was not a discussion, but rather game playing since he obviously did not have a clue what he was talking about. So do you have some sort of evidence that the 25mm+ so-called stones people are claiming to have passed can get through bile ducts that can only expand 2mm? Let's start there, then I have more things I would like to see answered.