CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: 10-Undecenoic Acid vs. Calcium Undecylenate
 
  Views: 16,237
Published: 10 years ago
 
This is a reply to # 2,053,032

Re: 10-Undecenoic Acid vs. Calcium Undecylenate


Thank you for sharing your blog comments. You are correct on all accounts. First, that they are the same:

http://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductChemicalPropertiesCB6232568_EN.htm


And the acidic environment issue. Appears Thorne has developed SF 742, in lieu of 722, with this concern in mind:

http://www.thorne.com/Products/Gastrointestinal-Health/General_GI_Support/prd...


>>Undecyn has recently been reformulated and combines the undecylenic acid from SF722 (in a powdered form bound to calcium) with Berberine HCl and time-release Betaine HCl. The reason for the HCl is that the calcium undecylenate, although more potent than straight undecylenic acid, works better in an acidic environment.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2023  curezone.com

3.047 sec, (1)