CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Nano-particle colloidal silver vs True colloidal silver
 
a.silbermann Views: 15,148
Published: 8 years ago
 
This is a reply to # 2,055,337

Re: Nano-particle colloidal silver vs True colloidal silver


Hi kscmac,

The US patent office doesn't check for accuracy or verify tests performed. The patent office is more concerned in prior art (previous similar patents), that all forms and paperwork have been properly submitted and especially that all Patent fees have been collected before prosecuting and granting a patent.

The patent you reference is a utility patent, a new way of making Colloidal Silver , rather than a new form of Colloidal Silver . Interestingly enough, the patent added (updated to include) bubble stirring in 2006. At that time there had been available for sale over interstate trade two generators with bubble stirring for at least 4 years.

The ABL product does work and the company has performed many tests (almost of these tests offshore in India). But the patent is brings value to ABL's parent company (to whom the patent is assigned) a silver mine.

Vincent @ http://www.colloidalsilvergenerator.biz


PS As my specialty is electronics, you might be interested to know that the US Patent office granted more than 12 patents to one company for previously patented circuit designs that became public domain between 1952-1955. The US Patent office doesn't check patents unless every "t" is not crossed nor lower every case "j" or "i" dotted.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2021  curezone.com

0.625 sec, (1)