Your two cents worth is absolutely fine, but I believe you miss the point. One should not trot out just any information, it must be relevant to the topic of discussion and not one of those come close to the topic.
Case by case...
3. Stabilised compound, and utter bullshit blurb
5. Silver salt
6. Industry affected
7. "An individual, after using home made brew"? C'mon, give me a break with this one?
" Argyria caused by properly made isolated silver"...As for this one, AC is not DC, (output 12VAC) therefore enough said already.
And the last one, "An individual 'reported?' acquiring Argyria after several years of daily ingestion of a product 'claiming?' to be @45ppm", again, give me a break here.
So, sorry, it's apparent I can't take my hat off to you after all. I'd suggest you rethink your motto. If you 'challenge' using the above criteria, and do so by meeting it 'head on', all you will get is a headache. I 'dismissed' each one in turn immediately after reading each one.
I'm not attacking you either, but I am attacking your information. This is the same regurgitated misinformation, disinformation and innuendo ad nauseam I mentioned earlier.