CureZone   Log On   Join
skin biopsy vs punch biopsy
sadbuttrue Views: 1,420
Published: 5 years ago
This is a reply to # 2,344,263

skin biopsy vs punch biopsy

A skin biopsy won't cut it. It has to be a punch biopsy. I even accused my dermatologist of faking a biopsy on me just to fulfill my request. She admitted that the specimen she took was shallow, and of course it came back negative.

I had a punch biopsy in 2012. It was a fresh lesion, never touched, never scratched open, and it was positive for arthropod activity and full of eosinophils.

Still--guess what--I am considered delusional, because the doctors can't find the pathogen, CAN'T CURE IT, and are deficient in knowledge and void of curiosity.
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2021

1.312 sec, (1)