CureZone   Log On   Join
The stories aren't "irritating" to people who
 
MidlothianGirl Views: 1,992
Published: 16 years ago
 
This is a reply to # 389,621

The stories aren't "irritating" to people who


had problems after gallbladder removal. I hope you continue on not having complications, but why cut an organ out of your body when it's not necessary in most cases?

That's the real question here. I'm all for personal choice, but if doctors had an ounce of understanding about gallbladder flushing, then people wouldn't have to have the surgery in the first place. It's ridiculous to keep insisting that people go ahead with a surgery that can potentially cause complications if they can resolve the problem on their own, through flushing.

Not everyone can flush, nor should everyone do a flush. But the majority of people with stones can safely flush them out, regardless of what doctors say. We have people who have ultrasounds proving that they stones they flushed out were present and then gone. If this is a fact (that the stones can be removed without surgery), then why do you keep insisting that surgery is a good thing?

It costs all of 3-5 bucks and a day or two out of your life, what's the big deal? You'll trust a doctor with a knife in his hand before you'll even TRY a flush?

That's odd to me.
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2021  curezone.com

0.313 sec, (1)