won hands down? i don't see how. trying to cut and run before you have to answer the hard questions? please explain how the lancet article proves it wrong... i don't see it, and I see the lancet article as fairly weak. the lancet article raises a good argument, but that's hardly the end of the story, as much as you would wish it so.
frankly i see the lancet article as more a political piece, to cover their "scientific" ass for the "letter" they previously put out. must have caught quite a bit of heat for it.
as for the zapper, sorry, i don't know the first thing about it and don't care. its not holistic as far as I can see. real holistic medicine is not concerned with parasites, bacteria and the like. that bs is for the mainstream, zappers are just mainstream light. like drugs, and most doctors, the zapper does not address the causing of illness, just the symptoms. its not the bugs silly, its the terrain.