CureZone   Log On   Join
Re:ParaZapper BUSTED & Raided by the FDA
ParaZapper Views: 3,720
Published: 17 years ago
This is a reply to # 654,149

Re:ParaZapper BUSTED & Raided by the FDA

>- Yet when I introduce a microscopic slide the imprinter/plate in the circuit of the Fscan to dirp, there is a clear difference in scanning using a lymph slide, for example, verses a dirp/scan without it, or using a heart tissue slide.

Introducing any external object into the equation will probably affect the analysis but not necessarily affect the treatment. There is a significant difference between the two. I am sure that if you put a slide of dirt into the equation, it would also change the readings too.

I do not recall saying that it did not work at all but only that I am not impressed.

>- You claim you have research, yet you don't own even an fscan.

Actually, I lean toward the QXCI although I do not own that either. I do receive some feedback from some QXCI owners. I also receive actual hospital test data from some individuals as well as test data from a couple of university studies.

These test data include results from multiple individuals in a controlled situation.

Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2023

11.063 sec, (1)