"There has never been a
theory of evolution." Clearly
false and dishonest.
No one knows how life began,
but so-called theories of evolution are continually being announced. Two lies. There is only one theory of
evolution and origins are not required to model a theory. The
same can be said for gravity, atoms,
tectonic plates, light, and nearly everything else, there is no need to
origin when constructing a theory as long as the theory meets the
of correctly modeling the known facts and be able to make predictions
of yet unknown
This book, The Altenberg 16:
Will the Real Theory of Evolution Please Stand Up? exposes the rivalry
today surrounding attempts to discover that elusive mechanism of
evolution, The big ones have already been
carefully observed and explained and they were not all that elusive as
we've known about them for 150 years.
rethinking evolution is pushed to the political front burner in hopes
"survival of the fittest" ideology can be replaced with a more humane
explanation for our existence and stave off further wars, economic
destruction of the Earth. That is a political /
philosophical shift that you are imagining and has nothing to do with
science. Evolution not humane or inhumane, it is a process. You might
as well suggest that gravity is inhumane every time you fall.
Evolutionary science is as much about the posturing, Lie
and bullying that goes on as it
is about actual scientific theory. Lie
It is a
social discourse involving Evolutionary science is not a social
discourse, it is a scientific discipline
hypotheses of staggering complexity with scientists,
recipients of the biggest grants of any intellectuals, LIE.
There is very little money available for evolutionary biologists /
assuming the power of politicians
while engaged in Animal House pie-throwing and name-calling:
"ham-fisted", "looney Marxist hangover", "secular
creationist", "philosopher" (a scientist who can’t get grants
anymore), "quack", "crackpot". . . STUPID RHETORIC, nwrt
In short, it’s a modern day quest for the holy grail, but with few
knights. LIE. It is a scientific pursuit.
a time that calls for scientific vision, scientific inquiry’s been
an industry of greed, There is no such industry.
with evolution books hyped like snake oil at a carnival. LIE Evolution books get very little press.
Perhaps the most egregious display of commercial dishonesty is next
celebration of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species – the so-called
evolution by natural selection, i.e., survival of the fittest, that was
on us almost 150 years ago. Christmas, Easter, anyone? This is no different thatn the
celebration of Newton's 300 a few years back. Scientific discoveries of
the magnitude of Newton, Darwin, Einstein deserve a celebration as
examples of trium of our intellect. The author is a liar,
Darwin's book was not foisted on anyone. It was published like other
books and the evidence became so overwhelming no intelligent person
could deny it in fact it took quite a few years before his ideas were
accepted by scientists.
Scientists agree that natural selection can occur.
But the scientific community
has known for some time that natural selection has nothing to do with
evolution. LIE. Without selection there can be no
evolution; selection is essential
It also knows that self-organization is real, No one has claimed otherwise.
that is, matter can
form without a genetic recipe – like the snowflake (non-living). It
without external guidance. No need for creator, no need for
intelligence, no need for purpose. All this fits nicely with
And that the Hydra (living), for example, can self-assemble its
even after being forced through a sieve. And that you can prevent this
from happening by blocking specific proteins that are essential to body
plan. There are even some neat experiments where the we've grown two
head and bi-caudal hydra, or hyra with head coming out of it's side to
form a T.
Yet, science elites continue to term
self-assembly and self-organization "woo woo". Since the only reason the author
knows about the hydra is because the science elite told him, the
accusation seem rather imbecilic.
they’re trying to steer science
in a more honest direction, that is, by
addressing non-centrality of the gene. Since that is what scientist do
as part of their profession, this is hardly news
So there’s a push for more
investigation into non-genetic areas, for how body plans originated,
instance. Charles Darwin never said. Wow! Genius, Darwin was not aware
of Genes. The importance of RNA and non coding regions are under active
investigation and if you are interested in body plan the all you need
to do is look up ubx, catenin, wtn, hox ...