Hi Tony,
yes, I think the treatment options are not really discussed in the first link from Mike Adams review of this book, and of course prevention would be a better course of action than the need for any treatment; however, the main difference here between the Natural Hygiene protocol for cancer is the utilization of the fast to enable the body to "Autolyze" tumours within the body...................

"Tumor-like lumps in female breasts ranging from the size of a pea to that of a goose egg will disappear in from three days to as many weeks. Here is a remarkable case of this kind that will prove both interesting and instructive to the reader. A young lady, age 21, had a large, hard lump--a little smaller than a billiard ball--in her right breast. For four months it had caused her considerable pain. Finally she consulted a physician who diagnosed the condition, cancer, and urged immediate removal. She went to another, and another and still another physician, and each made the same diagnosis and each urged immediate removal. Instead of resorting to surgery the young lady resorted to fasting and in exactly three days without food, the "cancer" and all its attendant pain were gone. There has been no recurrence after twenty-three years and I think that we are justified in considering the condition remedied.
Hundreds of such occurrences under fasting have convinced me that many "tumors" and "cancers" are removed by surgeons that are not tumors or cancers. They cause me to be very skeptical of the statistics issued to show that early operation prevents or cures cancer.
The removal of tumors by autolysis has several advantages over their surgical removal. Surgery is always dangerous; autolysis is a physiological process and carries no danger. Surgery always lowers vitality and thus adds to the metabolic perversion that is back of the tumor. Fasting, by which autolysis of tumors is accelerated, normalizes nutrition and permits the elimination of accumulated toxins, thus helping to remove the cause of the tumor. After surgical removal tumors tend to recur. After their autolytic removal, there is little tendency to recurrence. Tumors often recur in malignant form after their operative removal. The tendency to malignancy is removal by fasting."

http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020127shelton.III/020127.ch5.htm


After saying this, if I, or any of my closest family/friends were diagnosed with cancer of any kind, I would not hesitate in recommending two things............

#1. A prolonged water fast of medium to long duration.
#2. The exact same protocol that you recommend within your forum for the treatment of cancer, as outlined in your articles "Modern Medicine versus Nature in Treating Cancer Part I & II."

I have no doubt whatsoever, that the recommendations you have made for the successful treatment of cancer, are the very best and most efficacious treatments available anywhere.


Warmest Regards


Chris