HIV undetectable 
aifam55
10 y
16,110
RN SUCCESS
† Cross †
I was continuing to use the Beck zapper even after starting Atripla on July 2013. The HIV viral load results for the following 9 months after July 2013 was a low but persistent HIV viral load which had the doctor baffled. I used the Bob Beck pulser during this time, even though I was taking meds, since I was curious if it would help. I started doing the Beck protocol for no particular reason on Sept 2010. I already established that it flat out does not work on HIV and even using 2 zappers, taking the best herbs & vitamins, ozonated water , Colloidal Silver , mag pulser etc. had resulted in a high HIV viral load of 165,000 and 170,000 (2 different tests).
Being that I wanted to test the Beck zapper further, even while on meds, I used the Beck zapper extensively for 8 hours a day, 12 hours apart from taking the Atripla. I always had a persistent but low viral load, that had the doctor baffled. So in late April 2014 I started to use a Clark zapper and a Beck zapper (8 hours each per day). In July 2014 the results were the best by far and I was nearly HIV undetectable. So I decided to NOT use the Beck zapper and I used the Parazapper CC2 and MY only and now not only am I undetectable on the ultra-sensitive test (below 20 particles) but ALL blood work is normal. It is the first time the anemia is gone and the white blood cells are normal. I think 100% positive offset is a necessity in a zapper.
Btw, I have ZERO side-effects from Atripla.
The Beck zapper does somehow give a person energy, but I suspect that is more due to the frequency of 3.9 hertz, which had been know as "growth and regeneration" long before Beck made his zapper. I highly, highly suspect it is also "growth and regeneration" of HIV in addition to the body's normal cells.
So you may "feel" better for a while, but you sure aren't getting better. For lesser issues the Beck zapper may work.
I will find the method to eradicate all HIV and will post it when I find it. A disease created in a lab, has a cure. Want proof there is a cure? Two words. "Bill Clinton". Zillions of women and he never wears a condom.Advertisement
Hulda Clark Cleanses
Wormwood, Clove, Clarkia, Turmeric, Epsom Salt, Uva Ursi, Goldenrod
- HIV test and undetectable parazapper
10 y
15,108
This is a reply to # 2,216,670This is significant progress in a very short time and I must say congratulations and I hope that the success continues. Just curious, what has your Doc' said about this?
I appreciate you writing about this as I have heard the same from s few others in the past although they did not post it for others to read.
I believe that this is one of the strongest arguments presented that zappers can and do work but they have needed some improvements.
Multiple frequencies make a difference, especially specific Rife-Crane frequencies in sequence.
The amount of time of application needed to be long in the case of continuous replication types of virus such as HIV, HEP-C, HHV, etc.
One other concern, is did you zap right before or a short time before having blood drawn for the test? I think that for a more accurate result, the blood should be drawn at least a few hours after zapping. This way, if you are still having viral replication, it will show up.
Personally, I would like to see a dynamic study done where a blood sample is taken 15 minutes after zapping, 1 hour after, 2 hours after, 4 hours after, 8 hours and 12 hours after, in order to establish a rate of recovery. This would give a persona a much better idea of the amount of virus that is actively being produced in a day which is a much better indicator of viral activity.
Again, congratulations on the progress and may your success continue.
- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
15,408
This is a reply to # 2,216,697I deliberately did not zap for 14 hours before blood being drawn. I know lots of people won't post results and that's 90% of the problem, because others make the same mistakes. Btw, I found out I was anemic on Sept 2012. The high HIV viral load tests were done about May 2013, (170,000 and 165,000 viral load)) I started doing Beck zapping in Sept 2010 because I thought it was healthy to do. I take loads of vitamins and herbs and workout a lot. I started drinking ozonated water in early 2010 and lots of it. It does give energy. Needless to say, Beck's claims on HIV are totally fraudulent. I think is actually will INCREASE HIV. It's growth and regeneration across the board. A 3.9 hertz 100% positive offset zapper may be a much better Beck zapper.
John Crane did state the limitation on zapping. It does not reach all areas of the body, but it does reach some areas very well and that alone can make a big difference. I think Crane was excellent in his earlier days before the FDA stole everything and screwed him over. Many of the main CAFL frequencies are from John Crane and they are calculated from the original Rife frequencies. An even better zapper would be to use 727.5 vs 727 and 2007.5 vs 2008 because those are the exact derivatives of the original Rife frequencies. They would work faster on cancer. No zapper is anywhere close enough in accuracy to work except the MY Parazapper. And that is why most zappers don't work on cancer. HIV is 3554 hertz . (or a multiple of 3554 hertz). But the 100% positive offset probably works decent against HIV, even without the right frequency. I have loads of other tricks and I bet I get rid of this 100%. When Beck said he was curing CIA agents with is zapper, he gave a part truth. Gov't has a cure, no doubt.Advertisement
Hulda Clark Cleanses
Wormwood, Clove, Clarkia, Turmeric, Epsom Salt, Uva Ursi, Goldenrod
- Re: HIV test and undetectable beatty57
10 y
14,228
This is a reply to # 2,216,748I read an interesting internet post a while back.
A woman said she cured a venereal with 1 pound of vitamin ‘Ca day for 3 days and cured her self. True?????
I had no way to trace the post. ...dez...- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,175
This is a reply to # 2,216,764Maybe somewhat true. Back when they used AZT, vitamin C in very huge doses was actually much better than AZT and pharma did not like that fact at all. Vitamin C is great stuff because there is no toxic limit. Plus it works against toxins, even rattlesnake venom. So, I take Atripla and it is somewhat toxic, but I take loads and loads of vitamin C too, so I'll never have a problem with that med. Plus I take many herbs. The next best thing to a cure is getting the viral load way down. Even if the numbers are below 400, that makes that person non-contagious in every way. Lot of people don't know that. A person does not want to be just healthy, they want the virus as close to zero as possible. Then that person will never be able to spread the virus. That's why these idiots that say, to only go by how a person feels, are dangerous. You do want the numbers right. The video "House of Numbers" is more disinformation.
- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,175
- Re: HIV test and undetectable beatty57
10 y
14,534
This is a reply to # 2,216,748I read an interesting internet post a while back.
A woman said she cured a venereal with 1 pound of vitamin ‘C’ a day for 3 days and cured her self. True?????
I had no way to trace the post. ...dez... - Re: HIV test and undetectable parazapper
10 y
14,634
This is a reply to # 2,216,748>- John Crane did state the limitation on zapping. It does not reach all areas of the body,
Did Crane use a 4 point contact system with 3 points positive? I do not recall seeing that he did and this, I believe is extremely important to the "reach factor"
The 4 point contact is something that Clark overlooked and quite possibly, Crane may have overlooked that too.- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,446
This is a reply to # 2,216,778Crane's first pad-type Rife machines were footplates and handhelds, 4 points, but not 3 points positive, nor positive offset.
- Re: HIV test and undetectable parazapper
10 y
14,126
More
- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,981
This is a reply to # 2,216,818Advertisement
Hulda Clark Cleanses
Wormwood, Clove, Clarkia, Turmeric, Epsom Salt, Uva Ursi, Goldenrod
Here's the HIV frequencies. ALL 78% DUTY CYCLE, Square Wave, 100% positive offset.
22,812.50 hertz which is the 32nd harmonic of T-Lymphoma at 712.89 hertz
91,392 hertz which is the 128th harmonic of T-Lymphoma at 714 hertz
91,250 hertz which is the 128th harmonic of T-Lymphoma at 713 hertz
45,625 hertz which is the 64th harmonic of T-Lymphoma at 713 hertz
113,728 hertz which is the 32nd harmonic of HIV at 3554 hertz
106,240 hertz which is the 128th harmonic of Fasciolopsis buski at 830 hertz.
According to Hulda Clark regarding Fasciolopsis buski "establishes itself in the thymus it causes HIV AIDS. It only establishes itself in the thymus of some people. These people have benzene in their bodies. All HIV patients (100%) have both benzene and a larval stage of the intestinal fluke in their thymuses. The solvent benzene is responsible for letting the fluke establish itself in the thymus, In order to get HIV. you must have both the parasite and benzene in your body."
You always also see 830 hertz listed for HIV in addition to 3554 and 714 and that is why. But you want to use higher multiplier of the frequencies that are published and a 78% duty cycle for more harmonics.
- Re: HIV test and undetectable david1o1
10 y
13,912
This is a reply to # 2,216,818[quote]
I find that both positive offset and 3 point positive is important.
[/quote]
Based on what objective measurements ?- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,057
This is a reply to # 2,217,992Hulda Clark . She was the 1st to come up with this. But do remember that the body's cells and microbes have an OPPOSITE electric charge and Opposite Ph, so it does make sense.
- Re: HIV test and undetectable parazapper
10 y
14,346
This is a reply to # 2,218,027Actually, it was David Etheredge who came up with the 3 points positive, 1 point negative. Prior to that all use of foot pads was either stand alone or 2 points positive, 2 points negative.
In determining the effectiveness, over 10000 users were surveyed as to their usage methods. Among those who responded, of those who used the 3 point positive, 1 point negative almost all showed a higher level of effectiveness than those who used the other 2 methods. This was in general across the board but the greatest difference noted was with those who had #1 systemic conditions, and #2 those with internal organ issues.
The use of zappers that did not have the ability to maintain a true square wave under load limited the improvement that was observed.
- Re: HIV test and undetectable parazapper
10 y
14,346
- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,057
- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,981
- Re: HIV test and undetectable parazapper
10 y
14,126
- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,446
- Re: HIV test and undetectable beatty57
10 y
14,228
- Re: HIV test and undetectable andergens
4 y
4,160
This is a reply to # 2,216,697A lot of time has passed, now you can pass the HIV test 9 days after infection https://hivrna.com/ . I had a similar experience and I passed such a test. I was lucky - it turned out to be negative!
- Re: HIV test and undetectable aifam55
10 y
15,408
- Re: HIV undetectable sugarycartilage
10 y
14,387
- Re: HIV undetectable Johny Apple Bomb
10 y
14,318
This is a reply to # 2,216,670Advertisement
Hulda Clark Cleanses
Wormwood, Clove, Clarkia, Turmeric, Epsom Salt, Uva Ursi, Goldenrod
That's the first time I've heard of a Hulda Clark Zapper having much of an effect on anything.
I wonder what the test actually measures. You can still show a false positive because of the HIV anti bodies from what I've heard.
Hopefully you'll still be HIV free on your next test. But I've heard most of these HIV tests aren't reliable at all.
We will see.
ON another note. You could have disabled HIV in your blood for months before your body cleared it for example. So don't jump to conclusions.
And to add to the confusion the link below.
http://www.duesberg.com/articles/kmreason.html
- Re: HIV undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,639
This is a reply to # 2,217,701I've had a least a dozen HIV tests. Don't believe Duesberg. He's lying and his "logic" is full of holes. Anybody use a Clark zapper 8 hours a day like she said to do? The moderator on Yahoo groups (Beck Protocol) will tell you they never got the results Beck claimed for HIV either. He also sees through Duesberg's lies. HIV is 3554 hertz. If someone wants to zap for HIV, get a frequency generator set it on 3554 hertz and 100% positive offset and zap away. The Beck zapper will flat out not work on HIV.
//www.curezone.org/forums/am.asp?i=2101813
//www.curezone.org/forums/am.asp?i=1532720- Re: HIV undetectable Johny Apple Bomb
10 y
15,248
MoreThis is a reply to # 2,217,705Advertisement
Hulda Clark Cleanses
Wormwood, Clove, Clarkia, Turmeric, Epsom Salt, Uva Ursi, Goldenrod
3554 hertz
The Hulda Clark list says 365 KHZ.
CAFL says
HIV (see also AIDS) - 683, 714, 3554, 830, 450
HIV_HC – 18172.28, 904.74
If you're getting good results you should try adding a carrier wave above 1MHZ. This will penetrate through all tissues and Bone etc. An Atelier Robin is a good machine.
I always knew Beck would exaggerate. But his methods were the first thing that worked at all on my condition. And many others have had great results.
Most report Becks protocol doesn't show good results on HIV tests. You have to do a lot of research on those tests to know exactly what they prove. I hear that they are almost all worthless except the PCR test. If I remember correctly.
I don't have anytime to research because my 5 year horrible infection seems to be gone.
- Re: HIV undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,782
This is a reply to # 2,217,763The Beck zapper does work for some issues. It does not work on HIV, Here's the logic behind the frequencies.
450 & 683 are addressing pneumonia
which is a common problem in advanced Aids
727, 787, 880 are addressing a wide variety of conditions due to a supressed immune system that the Beck zapper may take of common settings used is most sessions
465 is addressing fungi and is another very
common setting used is most sessions
830 Fasciolopsis buski IMPORTANT , a parasite that harbors HIV
249 & 418 are addressing Kaposi's sarcoma which is a
type cancer often found in advanced aids patients
714 is addressing HTLV-3 (human T-lymphotropic virus-3) IMPORTANT
which is in Central Africa also addresses Gulf War Syndrome
Also T-Lymph virus TR (terminal repeat)
1500 and 1550 address a wide variety of general conditions
3554 - HIV IMPORTANT
2489 general anti-viral- Re: HIV undetectable david1o1
10 y
14,007
This is a reply to # 2,217,819Advertisement
Hulda Clark Cleanses
Wormwood, Clove, Clarkia, Turmeric, Epsom Salt, Uva Ursi, Goldenrod
How can you be sure that these frequencies are efficient to damage/kill an harmful organism or to help the human cells in some way when there is no objective measurements proving this ? You have simply decided to believe it is true because you have read it somewhere ?
Expand 27 messages, 21 to 47 of 47 parazapper
10 y
14,456
- Re: HIV undetectable david1o1
10 y
14,007
- Re: HIV undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,782
- Re: HIV undetectable Johny Apple Bomb
10 y
15,248
- Re: HIV undetectable aifam55
10 y
14,639
- HIV test and undetectable parazapper
10 y
15,108
fetched in 1.1875 sec, IP =172.70.131.158, y=1