What zapper to buy? 
#209684
8 y
2,214
† Cross †
Hi,
I am looking to buy a zapper for myself and family. Reading this forum makes me confused on what zapper to buy. I read about the plasma zapper from Jaguar, is it still available?
Can you please suggest me a zapper you know WORKS for a decent price.
Thanks!!- Re: What zapper to buy? jaguar57
8 y
1,889
This is a reply to # 2,320,288What you want to zap is important to know first.
zappers:
Clark stimulates immunity
Beck kills bacteria and deactivates viruses
Rife does nothing except impress your new age friends- Re: What zapper to buy? parazapper
8 y
1,801
- Re: What zapper to buy? jaguar57
8 y
1,880
This is a reply to # 2,321,367blah blah blah. Robert Thiel tested to see how much benefit a combinational treatment of nutritional supplements (vitamins, herbs, glandulars) and Clark zapping would have on a group of people presenting symptoms of infectious agents (bacteria, virus, fungi, parasites). The result was that 48% of them had at least a 75% improvement (abatement) of symptoms.
Thiel admitted that “nutritional interventions can, on their own, result in symptomatic improvement when chronic infections are present”.
"Any positively offset frequency kills all bacteria, viruses and parasites” was a claim made by Hulda Clark in her books but Thiel admitted that “I am not at all certain that zapping actually kills any invading microorganism” and that he didn’t agree with Clarks main hypothesis.
- Re: What zapper to buy? parazapper
8 y
1,848
This is a reply to # 2,321,380Yes, but Robert Thiel did not test ParaZapper which is well advanced beyond what he tested. ParaZapper did not exist at the time of his study.
Here is a user's review of both Beck and ParaZapper. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-8Xsj6HkOs- Re: What zapper to buy? jaguar57
8 y
1,886
This is a reply to # 2,321,405This is from the Thiel report: “Two different zappers were used: A commercial model and a specially engineered model. The commercial model used was a SyncroZap Pulse Generator Model B3 from Self Health Resource Center, Imperial Beach, California; it is operated by a 9 volt battery and produces a 32KHz output. The engineered model was based upon the same design as the commercial model (was also operated by a 9 volt battery), but due to an extra integrated circuit, its output sweeps the frequency in steps of 2KHz from 20-40 kHz “
The Parazapper outputs either 30KHz or 2.5KHz. I highly doubt that the 2.5KHz gives very much different results.
- You obviously know nothing about wha... parazapper
8 y
1,977
This is a reply to # 2,321,542>- The Parazapper outputs either 30KHz or 2.5KHz. I highly doubt that the 2.5KHz gives very much different results
You obviously know nothing about what you are talking about. That might have been true years ago.
Your comments show that you have not even bothered to watch the previous video that I posted or this one either. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzrNbqrZBqM
The man who made the video has used Clark, Rife, and several Beck units over a period of several years. When he states that ParaZapper is the best, he knows what he is talking about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGWSgIkaBY8
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... jaguar57
8 y
1,792
This is a reply to # 2,321,581A positive offset output means the output is direct current (DC) but in this case has frequencies imposed on it so it is a combination of a DC and a frequency output. Beck had experimented with DC and when applied to the arteries he said it "wrecked the blood". I also experimented with it and it did wreck my blood. After a couple months of daily DC blood electrification I thought I was going to die it made me so sick. That is why Beck switched to an alternating current (AC) output at 4 hertz frequency. All his successes were doing that. Beck had experimented with every type of electromedicine device and said that both the Clark and the Rife devices "did not work". I found the same to be true. I started my business back in '96 selling them and quit for lack of good customer feedback. I refuse to sell weak devices which is why I went mostly to the Beck devices because they definitely work. Clark was an obvious fraud and the "Rife" machines are not anything like the original Rife machines. And the "Rife" frequencies are not from Rife. About 10 of them were from Crane. All the rest are from any Tom, Dick, and Harry that said they thought they worked against such-and-such disease without any real proof. Yes the MY3 is the best Zapper, not because it is effective, but because it is fancy and complicated and tricks the fools into thinking that it must be good. Clark Zappers are fraudulent devices for fools who want to quickly part with their money. So are Rife devices. please read http://www.dragonfly75.com/eng/thiel.html Syyenergy7 is down on Beck blood electrification devices because they didn't cure his AIDS although Beck reported cures. I believe if you start soon after getting AIDS that blood electrification can keep it in check but syyenergy7 started late. Now he keeps the viral count down by using three anti-AIDS drugs, not by using the MY3. I know because we had many emails exchanged. He is well intended but has false hopes in this device.
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... parazapper
8 y
1,798
This is a reply to # 2,322,904ParaZapper does not offer just the 2 frequencies that you mention.
ParaZapper is far advanced over that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGWSgIkaBY8
Even our cheapest zapper, the ParaZapper 6-pack has 6 different modes of operation and 14 different frequencies.
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... parabs
8 y
1,660
This is a reply to # 2,322,944"
Even our cheapest zapper, the ParaZapper 6-pack has 6 different modes of operation and 14 different frequencies.
"
Mine is way more advanced than yours, it can produces 1000 frequencies, but they are all useless, it is just for hype and to influence the ignorant and gullible to buy my stuff.
In the domain of useless devices your are probably the king of the market (not sure, because there are others surprising scammers on the web)- If your frequencies are useless, the... parazapper
8 y
1,670
This is a reply to # 2,326,020If your frequencies are useless, then it is no match for ParaZapper which is easily demonstrated to be highly effective.
- Re: If your frequencies are useless,... parabs
8 y
1,523
This is a reply to # 2,326,137"
which is easily demonstrated to be highly effective.
"
These are just words, show us some proofs.
Have you tested and confirmed that each frequency that you have in your zapper, manage to kill the target harmful organism ? I bet that no, you just surf on the hype and trendy information partly spread by frequencygenerators/zappers sellers just to impress the desperate infected people to try this fascinating (in theory) technology.
- Re: If your frequencies are useless,... parazapper
8 y
1,651
This is a reply to # 2,326,212I already did.
The jar test and the video of the protozoa and also bacteria on the slide. These are more than sufficient for people who know what to look for and are seriously looking. Nothing will placate those who seek to harass and defame.
>- Have you tested and confirmed that each frequency
NO, and our website specifically states so. "Disclaimer! While many of these frequencies are listed in various public sources and they are shown in this list as associated with certain specific microbes, we are not representing or claiming that any of these frequencies are effective against any specific microbes ... "
Yet, all of your ranting and raging does NOTHING to diminish our customers satisfaction.
http://huldaclarkparazapper.com/cgi-bin/cart.cgi/customer_comments.html
- Re: If your frequencies are useless,... parazapper
8 y
1,651
- Re: If your frequencies are useless,... parabs
8 y
1,523
- If your frequencies are useless, the... parazapper
8 y
1,670
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... parabs
8 y
1,660
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... parabs
8 y
1,661
This is a reply to # 2,322,904"
the "Rife" frequencies are not from Rife. About 10 of them were from Crane. All the rest are from any Tom, Dick, and Harry that said they thought they worked against such-and-such disease without any real proof.
"
It has been shown that (where?) with the right frequency you can explode the parasite cells (be careful to not explode your human cells)
"
the MY3 is the best Zapper, not because it is effective, but because it is fancy and complicated and tricks the fools into thinking that it must be good.
"
you're mistaken/misinformed (Parazapper's typical reply)
(for those who don't get it, this post is derision)- Re: You obviously know nothing about... parazapper
8 y
1,693
This is a reply to # 2,326,019Actually, the frequencies published by Crane were from Rife as the collaborated on the project. Just more of you disinformation BS.
No, the MY3 is not fancy and it is complicated.
Is your problem that you find the 2 push buttons to be too confusing?
>- (be careful to not explode your human cells)
No, there is not a problem with that, human cells have a membrane that is structured completely different from the cell walls of lower organisms.
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... parabs
8 y
1,667
This is a reply to # 2,326,101"
human cells have a membrane that is structured completely different from the cell walls of lower organisms.
"
and just to be clear, parasitic worms are animals and have similar cells structures.
By lower organisms i suppose that you mean bacterias, protozoas, viruses...- Absolutely, the zapper can directly ... parazapper
8 y
1,614
This is a reply to # 2,326,103Absolutely, the zapper can directly kill bacteria, protozoa, fungi, and other single celled microbes as well are only a few higher organisms such as rotifers and likely, certain crustaceans.
However, since certain higher organisms such as helminths are highly dependent on certain microbes such as wohlbachia sp. then it is possible to kill those helminths by killing the microbes that these worms are dependent on. In fact, that is exactly the mechanism that certain anti-helminthic drugs depend on for their effectiveness.
And since ParaZapper is demonstrably more effective at killing a wide range of the microbes than regular zappers, this makes ParaZapper the best choice for such efforts.
- Re: Absolutely, the zapper can direc... parabs
8 y
1,525
This is a reply to # 2,326,136"
since certain higher organisms such as helminths are highly dependent on certain microbes such as wohlbachia sp. then it is possible to kill those helminths by killing the microbes that these worms are dependent on.
"
which sounds good in theory, but is poorly effective (totally ineffective) in practice and only make the parasitic worms move and create more damages, inflammations, rises of pressure in the parts of the body where they are.
Just for this reason, zappers are dangerous to use with some kinds of parasitic worms who are strong and tough.
So what you suggest is dangerous and can probably cause serious damages in some highly infected weak people (because of inflammation in the brain for example).
But since you are here just to make more sales and you don't care about the impact of your devices, please continue to spread your bs...- Re: Absolutely, the zapper can direc... parazapper
8 y
1,631
This is a reply to # 2,326,211>- poorly effective
Where are your scientific studies and/or proof of this? In fact, you have never even tried a ParaZapper so, what do you know about anything?
>- here just to make more sales
NO, I am here to present the information that I have to those who are interested and ask reasonable questions regardless of whether they buy or not.
We have plenty of sales and have had a backlog of orders for most of this year and last year.
- Re: Absolutely, the zapper can direc... parabs
8 y
1,624
This is a reply to # 2,326,273"
Where are your scientific studies and/or proof of this?
"
you are the one who spreads unproven claims, not me, so don't reverse the roles here, and i have never asked for any scientific studies so please don't start with this weak argument.
I have asked for experiments and results demonstrating the ability of your devices to kill target harmful organisms with specific frequencies. (what you claim)
"
we have plenty of sales and have had a backlog of orders for most of this year and last year.
"
my anti parasites photonic zappers sell well too, each is made of a common rock painted in photoluminescent paint, then it is blessed by the god of health (the combination of the emitted EMWs and the blessing of the god are the secret ingredients). It as a special ability to automatically detect the frequencies of the parasites which are in your body and then automatically generate the appropriate frequencies to make them explode.
You can sleep with it if you want, no side effects, you can recharge it by exposing it at the sun a few minutes a day (the more you charge it, the more intensity it will produce so don't charge it too much !). This is really amazing new tech, i have a backlog of orders too, because i say so, so it must be true (who needs proofs before believing something nowadays ?)...
You can order the device at bs-devices.biz, with a special reduction of 10% if you use the coupon code "SCAMMED"
(i am totally laughing at my own jokes :D )- then you have just proven that Hulda... parazapper
8 y
1,698
This is a reply to # 2,326,454>- the one who spreads unproven claims
On this point, you are specifically wrong. You made a statement which is a claim and I am challenging you to back it up.
The Jar experiments show specifically that multi-frequency zapping kills far more different microbes than any single frequency zapper does. This shows that a different frequency does make a difference in results. As for the difference that any one specific frequency makes, I do not need to reinvent the wheel. This has been claimed, not by one but by many.
If you bothered to go back and look at the video of the Rife machine killing protozoa, they showed that they had tried other frequencies that did not work or did not work as well.
If all else fails, get some common sense. If the killing of microbes with pulses work, and it does and has been demonstrated on numerous occasions, then frequency matters.
If this is not true, then you have just proven that Hulda Clark was right when she claimed that any frequency will work.
Regardless of how funny you think your joke is, you are not having much success in your movement.
Yep, the "Frequency does not matter movement". I can see them pouring out into the street right now. :^)
- Re: then you have just proven that H... parabs
8 y
1,460
This is a reply to # 2,326,503"
As for the difference that any one specific frequency makes, I do not need to reinvent the wheel. This has been claimed, not by one but by many.
"
There is a difference between having observed that one frequency is more effective to kill a specific organism and claiming that all the frequencies produced by your device are more effective to kill specific organisms.
Ok i am open minded, show me a proof (before/after photo/video) for each frequency that your device produces, that it kills the target organism more effectively. (but i bet that you won't)
- Re: then you have just proven that H... parabs
8 y
1,460
- then you have just proven that Hulda... parazapper
8 y
1,698
- Re: Absolutely, the zapper can direc... parabs
8 y
1,624
- Re: Absolutely, the zapper can direc... parazapper
8 y
1,631
- Re: Absolutely, the zapper can direc... parabs
8 y
1,525
- Absolutely, the zapper can directly ... parazapper
8 y
1,614
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... parabs
8 y
1,667
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... parazapper
8 y
1,693
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... parazapper
8 y
1,798
- Re: You obviously know nothing about... jaguar57
8 y
1,792
- You obviously know nothing about wha... parazapper
8 y
1,977
- Re: What zapper to buy? jaguar57
8 y
1,886
- Re: What zapper to buy? parazapper
8 y
1,848
- Re: What zapper to buy? jaguar57
8 y
1,880
- Re: What zapper to buy? parazapper
8 y
1,801
- Re: What zapper to buy? jaguar57
8 y
1,889
fetched in 0.1133 sec, IP =104.23.243.61, y=1