Given the way that blogs are counted, why do you have the "TOP 50 BLOGS" list (actually, top 100 are listed) go by the total overall number of "hits" when this number in no way reflects the number of times that people are interested enough to read the blog entries, not just the blog title page and blog description? It would seem to me to be more accurate to list the "top" blogs by the count of hits to the blog entries themselves, and not include those to just the blog title page and description page.

A blog could have a great, catchy title, attracting lots of initial "hits" yet not have that many actual readers. For example, my own blog, as of today a few minutes ago, has been "hit" 7358 times, but the actual blog entry "hits", when added up, are just 1458. I would take this to mean that the title to my blog attracted at least 5900 people who, after looking at the blog title page and/or reading the description, were not interested in going on to read the blog entries themselves. (Said number of uninterested people could actually be much higher, of course, and the number of interested people much lower, as a small core of interested readers could be responsible for the 1458 number by reading multiple blog entries.)

Thanks for your response!

Liora Leah