CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: 911 Truth and "Reputable Engineers" - deny this one Chris10!

Clark Kidney Cleanse
Dr. Hulda Clark’s Kidney Cleanse with purest products! Great pric...

Your Ad Here
Place your ad here !

J.Crow’s® Lugol’s Iodine
Free S&H.Restore lost reserves.J.CROW’S®Lugol’s Iodine Solut...

Original Dr. Hulda Clark
Hulda Clark Cleanses

Better Than Colonics. Period.
Oxygen Detoxification for both small and large intestine...

VOR Views: 15,822
Published: 13 years ago
This is a reply to # 1,230,732

Re: 911 Truth and "Reputable Engineers" - deny this one Chris10!

--->"Its quite simple no building of these types have ever collapsed from fire "

Typical flame engulfed building fires usually don't reach 1832°F. They also don't have preliminary impacts with jumbo-jet aircraft at 300mph in strategical places either. Would you agree that this was no ordinary building fire? If so, its not simply a matter of comparing it to other building fires and concluding it should behave the same. That is not common sense. That is poorly formed conjecture (no offense).

Consider some facts: Burning jet fuel can melt steel. The force of those impacts did weaken structural integrity to a degree. But even after these 2 factors, the towers held as their initial design promised. The 3rd factor was not conceived by their designers. With modern day burning jet fuel now plastered over many floors and square footage (like napalm), that becomes widespread ignition for significant material combustion (rugs, drapes, furniture, paper, etc) inside the buildings over widespread area. No oxygen? How did you come to that conclusion? The buildings were riddled with holes and broken windows. Oxygen was plentiful if not gluttonous. Now, if you have 5-10 floors with marginal integrity and one floor fails above an already weakened floor, what is going to happen? I'll let you answer that.

I don't dispute that governments at times can act against its people and do bad things. There are also plenty of failed systems and lots to criticize. However, the 911 and Chemtrail arguments just aren't compelling enough for me or other professionals to believe. This is the primary reason they don't get much traction except Internet blogging and flaky orgs. Its not that we aren't aware and its not that we are afraid. Do you realize how insulting that sounds? I would act immediately if I thought this had any merit. It just flat doesn't.

I believe its being orchestrated by both fraudsters and ill-informed people, and then propgated as fact to an unsuspecting online audience. I have nothing against people who believe this flakiness. That is their choice. But when you are so wrapped up in poorly concocted conspiracies, the sad fact is you end up missing issues that truly deserve your focus.


Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


Donate to CureZone

CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with

Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2021

2.937 sec, (2)