Re: Confessions of an Ex-Vaccine Researcher

That statement is a lame effort to discount the entire article. You obviously have not done any research to fully investigate what he is stating. There have been no long-term studies as he reports. There are no maps that exist in order to determine the effects of vaccines once they enter the body. Show me this specifically and I will then concede that your statement holds merit.

Recently the PC1 pig virus was found in a vaccine which resulted in the FDA suspending vaccine administration for the Rotovirus. Hmmmmm!! IF IT WAS UNDETECTED PREVIOUSLY, HOW HAS THE EFFECT BEEN EVALUATED MEDICALLY??

I think he mentioned in this article very clearly that contamination was and still is a problem. Go to the CDC website and look up SV40. Contaminants are acknowledged on the website. The CDC is slow to acknowledge, react, and remove contaminants once detected. The "hot lots" are still administered even after a problem has been detected. You are then issued a statement that "there is no problem" with what has already been administered. How do they know?

With the new DNA testing, it is opening up a world of information that probably was covered up previously. This contamination was a prime example that could be used to support the vaccine researchers contention that there are contaminants in vaccines in which long-term effects have not been measured, weighed or considered. We need to worry as parents of children are exposed to the various components therein.

People need to evaluate the statements being made in this article, find corresponding articles to prove or disprove his position before discounting the information being provided. If a pig virus managed to go undetected, what else has gone undetected? Trust me, you will never be told. What are the effects of non-detection? You will never know. Think about this and then tell me that that this article is flawed. Go the the website: Center for Infectious and Complex diseases. It is an eye-opener.