Re: With all respect, ...

"They were weak in the first place, or they wouldn't have changed into cancer cells. "

My own conclusion is that metastatic tumors consist of weak mutated tissue cells as well as potent cancerous stem cells. THe stem cells are not weak, they are aggressive and virile, and they are the ones that cause metastisis. THis is why the absurd medical fixation on shrinking tumors is an utter failure. The chemo destroys the weak tumor cells, but not the aggressive ones, and perhaps creates an environment where the metastatic cells can more freely move. The success with enzymes has been because they can attack stem cells. Feverfew has also recently been discoverd to attack malignant stem cells.

My only problme with your posts on ozone is your constant "any cancer, all the time" claim. There is no such treatment that can cure any cancer all the time. You should know this. Just read the books. Hulda Clark had failures, Gerson had failures, Kelley had failures, and the users of ozone that I am familiar with also had failures. My conclusion is that the best hope for anybody with advanced cancer is aggressive nutritional therapy (I will include ozone, though I can not vouch for its efficacy). However, every cancer patient (as well as all of you "healthies" out there), must understand that we all must die. There are no guarantees, except that we are guaranteed to die.


I would hope that every cancer patient would consider death more significant than life, for our destiny is eternal. Once we shuffle off this mortal coil, there remains only one question. Do we live in the presence of the One True God, or apart from Him? Should we expend all of our time trying to live a few years, and die not even knowing our Creator? As for me, I fight to live, but to die is gain.

David